- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Please clarify which versions to report issues on

by DougEdmunds

Where's the best place to get the most recent v 1.3 on any given day? Some choices appear to be: 1. https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/ (but which link?) 2. http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download : the link to "PharoCore 1.3 (just core)" 3. Other location? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Please-clarify-which-versions-to-report-issues-on-tp3… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Meanwhile, at another vm

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 12 Apr 2011, at 16:20, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2011-April/002802.html Sounds nice, but could you give some context, URLs ? What are they talking about ? Sven

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3062 in pharo: CompilerEvaluationTest >> testEvaluationOfSelfSend dependent on SmalltalkEditor

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #1 on issue 3062 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: CompilerEvaluationTest >> testEvaluationOfSelfSend dependent on SmalltalkEditor http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3062 This has been fixed

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3109 in pharo: TextURL >> #actOnClickFor: dependent on network

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Labels: Milestone-1.3 Comment #1 on issue 3109 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: TextURL >> #actOnClickFor: dependent on network http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3109 #actOnClickFor: has been removed in 1.3

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Please clarify which versions to report issues on

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:00 PM, DougEdmunds wrote: > If you start to open a new issue on > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > this is what appears: > > "We are currently working on version 1.2, so please verify your issue with > the latest 1.2 Unstable version before reporting it - we improved a lot > the system." > We forgot to update this. So I updated it now. We are working on 1.3. 1.2 will only see fixes of real bugs of the kind that are extremely important. > But on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download, the 'unstable' version > is listed as > Pharo 1.3 image (unstable), with a link to PharoCore 1.3 (just core). > > Is there another place to go to for 1.2 Unstable? Or should everything be > reported against 1.3? > 1.3 > If it is 1.3, can someone update the default text new issue info on > code.google.com? DONE -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3262 in pharo: Debugger enhancement to open in a background process when the UI process is busy

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #6 on issue 3262 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: Debugger enhancement to open in a background process when the UI process is busy http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3262 "Strangely enough the functions introduced by eliot got removed and not invoked in latter versions." So let's close this

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] UIBuilder Tool

by sourav roy

thanks.... Original message From:"eMko"< mm007.emko(a)gmail.com >Date: 11 Apr 11 23:53:49Subject: Re: [Pharoproject] UIBuilder ToolTo: pharoproject(a)lists.gforge.inria.frYou can download it from squeaksourcehttp://www.squeaksource.com/UIBuilder.html .If you want some practical information, watch youtubehttp://www.google.cz/search?q=uibuilder+pharo+youtube&ie=utf8&oe=utf8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:cs:official&client=firefoxa#q=uibuilder+pharo+youtube&hl=cs&client=firefoxa&hs=hu1&rls=org.mozilla:cs:official&prmd=ivns&source=univ&tbm=vid&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=NkajTbCiHsiBOt7LvTQ&ved=0CDkQqwQ&fp=46e891d5c7303f5eOne big drawback of Pharo smalltalk is lack of good documentation, butthings are getting better and better.View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/UIBuilderTooltp3442594p3442745.htmlSent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now!

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] keymapping

by Guillermo Polito

Not completely, It does a complete mess with selection. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillo.bruni(a)inria.fr>wrote: > hmm but IMO it used to work, right? > what is the issue right now? > From what I know, the problem is that you cannot "empty" internal commands, > since there was not EmptyShortcut object. So whenever you would type the > shortcut for an internal command which has not been modified through > keymapping it still would use the default one. However overriding a shortcut > with Keymapping should work. > > camillo > > > On 2011-04-12, at 17:12, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > I'll be spliting my free time the next weekend in: > > - refactor TextMorph/editors to see what can be done > - writing a new TextMorph w/o using editors > > But I can't promise anything :/ > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> That is a pity :(. Is there any hope to have an improvement on this front >> any time soon? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 12 Apr 2011, at 15:36, Guillermo Polito wrote: >> >> > I was trying to get Keymapping work well with TextMorph the last days. >> But TextMorph fought against me... Event handling between TextMorph and >> editor is very coupled and spaghetized :P. >> > >> > So, if you want shortcut for a TextMorph, they are not available yet :/. >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillo.bruni(a)inria.fr> >> wrote: >> > Hi Doru, >> > >> > The last version I worked on together with guille is in KeyMapping. >> Furthermore I think the Configurations were not adapted, so you will have to >> load the packages manually: >> > >> > - Core >> > - Settings >> > - Shortcuts >> > - Test >> > >> > cheers, >> > Camillo >> > >> > >> > On 2011-04-12, at 12:24, Tudor Girba wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I would like to give it a try to integrate Keymapping into Glamour, >> but I see that there are two repositories where Keymapping-related packages >> are committed: Keymapping and ShortWays (this has the latest commit). >> > > >> > > Furthermore, there are three ConfigurationOfKeymapping (also in >> MetacelloRepository). >> > > >> > > Where do I get the latest and supported Keymapping from? >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Doru >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > www.tudorgirba.com >> > > >> > > "Relationships are of two kinds: those we choose and those that >> happen. They both matter." >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Some battles are better lost than fought." >> >> >> >> >> > >

April 12, 2011

[Pharo-project] Please clarify which versions to report issues on

by DougEdmunds

If you start to open a new issue on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list this is what appears: "We are currently working on version 1.2, so please verify your issue with the latest 1.2 Unstable version before reporting it - we improved a lot the system." But on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download, the 'unstable' version is listed as Pharo 1.3 image (unstable), with a link to PharoCore 1.3 (just core). Is there another place to go to for 1.2 Unstable? Or should everything be reported against 1.3? If it is 1.3, can someone update the default text new issue info on code.google.com? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Please-clarify-which-versions-to-report-issues-on-tp3… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] keymapping

by Camillo Bruni

hmm but IMO it used to work, right? what is the issue right now? >From what I know, the problem is that you cannot "empty" internal commands, since there was not EmptyShortcut object. So whenever you would type the shortcut for an internal command which has not been modified through keymapping it still would use the default one. However overriding a shortcut with Keymapping should work. camillo On 2011-04-12, at 17:12, Guillermo Polito wrote: > I'll be spliting my free time the next weekend in: > > - refactor TextMorph/editors to see what can be done > - writing a new TextMorph w/o using editors > > But I can't promise anything :/ > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > That is a pity :(. Is there any hope to have an improvement on this front any time soon? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 12 Apr 2011, at 15:36, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > I was trying to get Keymapping work well with TextMorph the last days. But TextMorph fought against me... Event handling between TextMorph and editor is very coupled and spaghetized :P. > > > > So, if you want shortcut for a TextMorph, they are not available yet :/. > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillo.bruni(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > Hi Doru, > > > > The last version I worked on together with guille is in KeyMapping. Furthermore I think the Configurations were not adapted, so you will have to load the packages manually: > > > > - Core > > - Settings > > - Shortcuts > > - Test > > > > cheers, > > Camillo > > > > > > On 2011-04-12, at 12:24, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to give it a try to integrate Keymapping into Glamour, but I see that there are two repositories where Keymapping-related packages are committed: Keymapping and ShortWays (this has the latest commit). > > > > > > Furthermore, there are three ConfigurationOfKeymapping (also in MetacelloRepository). > > > > > > Where do I get the latest and supported Keymapping from? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > > "Relationships are of two kinds: those we choose and those that happen. They both matter." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Some battles are better lost than fought." > > > > >

April 12, 2011