- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Moving tracker mails to second list?

by Guillermo Polito

Mmm, I got used to the issues in the list. But new people (like Santiago, who presented himself the other day) got crazy :P. Gmail and it's multiple inboxes help me :) Maybe we can adopt an issue naming convension with tags like [Pharo-Morphic] [Pharo-Collections], so people can build more intelligent rules to organize their mail clients. Guille On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Stefan Marr <pharo(a)stefan-marr.de> wrote: > Hi: > > On 17 Apr 2011, at 15:32, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > The problem is that we use a tracker that we can not change. Google can > just send all emails or none. That's it. > > > > In addition, it does not support sub-projects. So we have just a mess of > 450 issues, instead of sorting them nicely. E.g. to > > > > Collections > > Morphic > > FilesSystem > > O2 > > OB > > > > and then realizing that each in itself has not that many issues... > (devide and conquer *does* work!). > > > > It's always the same: Perfection is something else, but if we do not just > use what we are just stuck. > I use a mailing list user on my server that has a .forward file and does > deliver the mails according to certain criteria to different users or other > mail addresses. > > Just add another indirection to fix/work around the problem ;) > > Best regards > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Marr > Software Languages Lab > Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium > http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr > Phone: +32 2 629 2974 > Fax: +32 2 629 3525 > > >

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Moving tracker mails to second list?

by Stefan Marr

Hi: On 17 Apr 2011, at 15:32, Marcus Denker wrote: > The problem is that we use a tracker that we can not change. Google can just send all emails or none. That's it. > > In addition, it does not support sub-projects. So we have just a mess of 450 issues, instead of sorting them nicely. E.g. to > > Collections > Morphic > FilesSystem > O2 > OB > > and then realizing that each in itself has not that many issues... (devide and conquer *does* work!). > > It's always the same: Perfection is something else, but if we do not just use what we are just stuck. I use a mailing list user on my server that has a .forward file and does deliver the mails according to certain criteria to different users or other mail addresses. Just add another indirection to fix/work around the problem ;) Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Moving tracker mails to second list?

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 17, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Stefan Marr wrote: > Hi: > > On 17 Apr 2011, at 14:47, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The tracker generates a mail even for tiny status changes (e.g. 1.3 --> 1.3-Dev)... "Accepted" to "Fixed"... >> >> We did the tracker to the main list so people realise that a lot is going on on the tracker. I guess we accomplished >> that mission. > Yes, you managed so well, that at least I started to filter them out immediately. > This a 'mission failed' in my book. > > If you still want to make people aware about the issues in the tracker, then you should find a solution that only posts for a new issue are something like that. The problem is that we use a tracker that we can not change. Google can just send all emails or none. That's it. In addition, it does not support sub-projects. So we have just a mess of 450 issues, instead of sorting them nicely. E.g. to Collections Morphic FilesSystem O2 OB and then realizing that each in itself has not that many issues... (devide and conquer *does* work!). It's always the same: Perfection is something else, but if we do not just use what we are just stuck. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Moving tracker mails to second list?

by Stefan Marr

Hi: On 17 Apr 2011, at 14:47, Marcus Denker wrote: > Hi, > > The tracker generates a mail even for tiny status changes (e.g. 1.3 --> 1.3-Dev)... "Accepted" to "Fixed"... > > We did the tracker to the main list so people realise that a lot is going on on the tracker. I guess we accomplished > that mission. Yes, you managed so well, that at least I started to filter them out immediately. This a 'mission failed' in my book. If you still want to make people aware about the issues in the tracker, then you should find a solution that only posts for a new issue are something like that. And well, you have to find a way to convince people like me, that are notoriously lazy, to remove the rule in their mail client... Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3990 in pharo: 2 dependencies removed from ToolBuilder: PluggableMenuSpec & PluggableMenuItemSpec

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #5 on issue 3990 by Benjamin...(a)gmail.com: 2 dependencies removed from ToolBuilder: PluggableMenuSpec & PluggableMenuItemSpec http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3990 Fixed :) Now the buildWith just call asMenuMorph Attachments: PluggableMenuSpec-buildWith.st 235 bytes

April 17, 2011

[Pharo-project] Moving tracker mails to second list?

by Marcus Denker

Hi, The tracker generates a mail even for tiny status changes (e.g. 1.3 --> 1.3-Dev)... "Accepted" to "Fixed"... We did the tracker to the main list so people realise that a lot is going on on the tracker. I guess we accomplished that mission. Now >1000 Mails/Week is too much. So I vote for moving the tracker emails to a second list. This way people can easily subscribe to that. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Question on finder

by Benjamin

Here, for: 'ab*'. 'abcd'. true i have match proposed. And for '*bcd*' . 'abcdef' . true too So probably you do not have the last version :) Ben On Apr 17, 2011, at 2:18 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Apr 17, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Benjamin wrote: > >> Are you sure to use the last version of the Finder ? >> >> Because I use to have this bug, I fix it, and I though I have posted the fix, but maybe I forgot :) >>> >>> Maybe it has already been discussed. >>> In a finder I entered: '*bcd*' . 'abcdef' . true >>> I am surprised to not have obtained #match: > > MethodFinder is very simplistic: It just tries a list of selectors. #match: is not in this list. > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Question on finder

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 17, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Benjamin wrote: > Are you sure to use the last version of the Finder ? > > Because I use to have this bug, I fix it, and I though I have posted the fix, but maybe I forgot :) >> >> Maybe it has already been discussed. >> In a finder I entered: '*bcd*' . 'abcdef' . true >> I am surprised to not have obtained #match: MethodFinder is very simplistic: It just tries a list of selectors. #match: is not in this list. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Finder: case-insensitive search

by Benjamin

A mistake probably :) Ben On Apr 15, 2011, at 7:54 PM, DougEdmunds wrote: > I did a search for 'message names' in Source using Finder. I get one set of > results. > I get different results if I search for 'Message names'. > I get yet different results if I search for 'Message Names'. > > I want to search without having to guess every possible case-sensitive > combination. How can I search Source for case-insensitive results? > > By comparison, searching in Selectors is not case sensitive. A search for > 'message' will find 'message' or 'Message'. Entering 'message' and > checking the regex box limits it to case-sensitive results (only finding > message but not Message). But it doesn't work this way for > Source. Why the inconsistency? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Finder-case-insensitive-search-tp3452633p3452633.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

April 17, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Question on finder

by Benjamin

Are you sure to use the last version of the Finder ? Because I use to have this bug, I fix it, and I though I have posted the fix, but maybe I forgot :) Ben On Apr 15, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe it has already been discussed. > In a finder I entered: '*bcd*' . 'abcdef' . true > I am surprised to not have obtained #match: > > Cheers, > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > >

April 17, 2011