- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Phexample integrated with Autotest and OB (was ConfigurationOfPhexample (was #assert:equals: feels backwards))

by Sean P. DeNigris

Niko Schwarz-2 wrote: > > Phexample doesn't duplicate the logic of what is a change method, it > changes it. The rational is to allow the user to choose a speaking test > name, that accurately describes the test: > Yes, quite nicely in fact! The issue was that the "testXxx" was hardcoded in OB and Autotest, so Phexample tests were not picked up by Autotest, and couldn't be run through OB (because "shouldXxx" was not recognized as test methods). The patch was to OB and Autotest, integrating Phexample into the tools. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Phexample-integrated-with-Autotest-and-OB-was-Configu… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Phexample integrated with Autotest and OB (was ConfigurationOfPhexample (was #assert:equals: feels backwards))

by niko.schwarz＠googlemail.com

Hi Sean! Phexample doesn't duplicate the logic of what is a change method, it changes it. The rational is to allow the user to choose a speaking test name, that accurately describes the test: shouldNicelyHandleNotifications And the like. Is this really in conflict with OB? Niko On 24.06.2011, at 21:01, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > You can now have Phexample playing nicely with OB and Autotest... > * Autotest - I uploaded a new package (Autotest-Core-SeanDeNigris.5) that > will pick up Phexample and any other framework that defines tests > differently (it uses the class's #allTestSelectors method). > * OB - I uploaded a slice to the Pharo inbox that does the same for OB > (SLICE-Issue-4449-Feature-OB-can-handle-arbitrarily-defined-test-selectors-SeanDeNigris.1). > > All it took was removing some duplication in the system - TestCase, > Autotest, and OB were all repeating the "what is a test method" logic. > > HTH, > Sean > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Phexample-integrated-with-Autotest-and-OB-was-Configu… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://scg.unibe.ch/staff/Schwarz twitter.com/nes1983 Tel: +41786126354

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote: > > As soon as we add Sophie code, we need to add the Sophie license to the > license of Pahro. > I assumed we were just talking about making in loadable and useful, not adding it to the image. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Quicktime-and-MP3-harvested-from-Sophie-tp3747203p374… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes exactly Stef On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: > Surely the Smalltalk part's covered by _this_ licence? > > http://www.futureofthebook.org/sophie/about/license/ > > As opposed to the licence for Sophie 2.0. > > frank

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

it is different from www.opensophie.org oops does not exist anymore.... http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/opensophie.org Stef On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Johannes Rasche wrote: > as you may know Sophie project is now rewritten in Java > > the license is: http://www.sophie2.org/users/licensing.html > > I would ask them, whether the same conditions apply for the Smalltalk code > > > Am 16.08.2011 um 12:24 schrieb Marcus Denker: > >> >> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Johannes Rasche wrote: >> >>> Hi all, especially Sean >>> >>> assume my recent posting has been overseen, therefore again: >>> >>> I'm referring to Sean's harvesting of Sophie. >>> >>> Is somebody going to finalize this Quicktime harvesting ? >>> >> >> What is the license? >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> >> >

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie

by Johannes Rasche

Am 16.08.2011 um 15:27 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris: > > Johannes Rasche wrote: >> >> Is somebody going to finalize this Quicktime harvesting ? >> > Yes, you are apparently, lol! > OK, that's what I wanted to know > Here are the relevant discussions, some of which may help: > http://forum.world.st/Sophie-MPEG-Player-td2341744.html > http://forum.world.st/Playing-Flash-movies-in-image-was-Sophie-MPEG-Player-… > http://forum.world.st/ANN-SqueakMovieMorph-Alpha-plays-any-video-file-playa… > http://forum.world.st/How-I-can-do-SWF-files-playing-in-pharo-td3161269.html > http://forum.world.st/Playing-Flash-movies-in-image-td3167383i20.html I knew that stuff (except that last item) > Johannes Rasche wrote: >> >> mp3... didn't work for me... I assume it's due to less maintenance of the >> mpeg3 plugin >> > Are you using the Quicktime code to play them, or the other mp3 code I > posted about? IIRC, the mp3 plugin is not used for the Qt stuff, and the > other player was very old. Try Qt. I made a first attempt last week with Qt with and m4a file and failed - anyway I'll keep on > > HTH, > Sean > yes it helped for the moment - thanks so far Johannes > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Quicktime-and-MP3-harvested-from-Sophie-tp3746691p374… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] latest filesystem is unloadable

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

sorry 2.0.1 Now what I want to say is that I make sure that 2.0.1 is working. Now I did not check the other files. Camillo did a pass to clean a bit. For 1.4, I guess that we should integrate your changes in 1.4 Now I have no idea what colin did and it this is this change that broke something. BTW for Moose I would like to know if the latest version of RPackage is working. I got no news from my mail. Stef On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Continuous integration is there to test continuously. I was not complaining :). I just reported this issue, especially given that it is a critical one (not being able to load the code). The problem appeared today, because yesterday it worked fine. > > But, where is 2.2.1? I load the code from the Configuration from the official www.squeaksource.com/fs.html repository, and there the latest version is 2.0.2. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 15 Aug 2011, at 23:52, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Why do you want to load the bleeding edge since 2.2.1 is fully tagged for reproduceability. I never used loadBleedingEdge and I did not garantee that it would work. >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Aug 15, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The bleeding edge version of Filesystem is unloadable in Pharo 1.3 (see the attached debug log). >>> >>> To test it, try: >>> >>> Gofer new >>> squeaksource: 'fs'; >>> package: 'ConfigurationOfFilesystem'; >>> load. >>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfFilesystem) loadBleedingEdge >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." >>> >>> >>> <PharoDebug.log.zip> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Live like you mean it." > >

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] latest filesystem is unloadable

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Doru We did a pass after the integration of FS in 1.4 Now somebody should update the configuration to reflect the changes made. And also check the changes of Colin and get a working version back Stef On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Continuous integration is there to test continuously. I was not complaining :). I just reported this issue, especially given that it is a critical one (not being able to load the code). The problem appeared today, because yesterday it worked fine. > > But, where is 2.2.1? I load the code from the Configuration from the official www.squeaksource.com/fs.html repository, and there the latest version is 2.0.2. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 15 Aug 2011, at 23:52, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Why do you want to load the bleeding edge since 2.2.1 is fully tagged for reproduceability. I never used loadBleedingEdge and I did not garantee that it would work. >> >> Stef >> >> >> On Aug 15, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The bleeding edge version of Filesystem is unloadable in Pharo 1.3 (see the attached debug log). >>> >>> To test it, try: >>> >>> Gofer new >>> squeaksource: 'fs'; >>> package: 'ConfigurationOfFilesystem'; >>> load. >>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfFilesystem) loadBleedingEdge >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." >>> >>> >>> <PharoDebug.log.zip> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Live like you mean it." > >

Aug. 16, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Quicktime and MP3 harvested from Sophie

by Marcus Denker

On Aug 16, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: > On 16 August 2011 14:33, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: >> frank wrote: >>> Meaning that anything ripped out of Sophie 1.0 should be (or is, rather) >covered by an MIT licence, rather than Sophie 2.0's licence. Which is a good >thing! >> >> Sophie 2.0 is ECL: http://www.sophie2.org/users/licensing.html >> Sophie 1.0 is BSD: http://www.futureofthebook.org/sophie/about/license >> >> Where did you read about MIT?` > > BSD, MIT. They're pretty much identical. Anyway, I should have said "BSD". But identical is not the same. As soon as we ad Sophie code, we need to add the Sophie license to the license of Pahro. And than the whole license story gets one notch more complicated again. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Aug. 16, 2011

[Pharo-project] Congratulations on help system

by Torsten Bergmann

Max Leske wrote: >Just wanted to let the people who wrote the Pharo help system know that I >think you did a great job. Thank you, I tried to do my best when I wrote it. But as always there is room for improvement. >While I'm at it, I'll also write a small help part for Filesystem. Cool, would like to see more on this! Thanks Torsten -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

Aug. 16, 2011