- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] jenkins mac cogvm misses os process?

by Igor Stasenko

On 8 September 2011 13:09, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to run OSProcess with the Jenkins version of the CogVM, I get the message that the accessor is missing. When I run the same code with the Cog 2489 from Eliot, it works fine. > > You can reproduce by executing: > OSProcess waitForCommand: 'echo sleeping...; sleep 3; echo I just slept for three seconds' > check the internal module list of VM: Smalltalk listBuiltinModules. it has built internally in last cocoa VM. Because if it built as external, we have some problems. > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "When people care, great things can happen." > > > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Sept. 8, 2011

[Pharo-project] Build failed in Hudson: Pharo Core 1.3 #404

by marcus.denker＠inria.fr

See <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/404/> ------------------------------------------ [...truncated 77 lines...] 3300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 28% 3.65M 3s 3350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 4.06M 3s 3400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 3.34M 3s 3450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 3.96M 3s 3500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 30% 1.91M 3s 3550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 30% 2.16M 3s 3600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 31% 2.99M 3s 3650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 31% 3.72M 3s 3700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 3.85M 3s 3750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 3.96M 3s 3800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 3.40M 3s 3850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 33% 3.47M 3s 3900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 33% 4.01M 3s 3950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 34% 3.54M 3s 4000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 34% 2.15M 3s 4050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 3.49M 3s 4100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 3.21M 3s 4150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 3.73M 3s 4200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 36% 3.69M 3s 4250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 36% 3.62M 3s 4300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 37% 3.97M 3s 4350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 37% 3.48M 3s 4400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 3.60M 3s 4450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 3.48M 3s 4500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 4.03M 3s 4550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 39% 3.67M 3s 4600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 39% 3.75M 3s 4650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 40% 3.75M 2s 4700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 40% 3.73M 2s 4750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 3.65M 2s 4800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 1.19M 2s 4850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 2.10M 2s 4900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 42% 3.55M 2s 4950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 42% 3.52M 2s 5000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 43% 10.2M 2s 5050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 43% 4.19M 2s 5100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 4.03M 2s 5150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 3.70M 2s 5200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 1.87M 2s 5250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 45% 3.37M 2s 5300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 45% 10.9M 2s 5350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 46% 3.76M 2s 5400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 46% 3.56M 2s 5450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.69M 2s 5500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.68M 2s 5550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.61M 2s 5600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 48% 3.33M 2s 5650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 48% 4.05M 2s 5700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 3.34M 2s 5750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 4.04M 2s 5800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 3.60M 2s 5850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% 3.35M 2s 5900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% 3.55M 2s 5950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% 3.35M 2s 6000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% 3.21M 2s 6050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 3.67M 2s 6100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 3.69M 2s 6150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 4.12M 2s 6200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% 3.65M 2s 6250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% 3.61M 2s 6300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% 3.74M 2s 6350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% 4.11M 2s 6400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.03M 2s 6450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.56M 2s 6500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.88M 2s 6550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% 3.48M 2s 6600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% 10.1M 2s 6650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% 3.80M 2s 6700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% 2.90M 2s 6750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 3.66M 2s 6800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 2.71M 2s 6850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 3.28M 2s 6900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% 2.16M 2s 6950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% 1.16M 2s 7000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% 3.50M 2s 7050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% 2.39M 2s 7100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 3.15M 2s 7150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 3.89M 2s 7200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 3.12M 1s 7250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% 3.57M 1s 7300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% 3.97M 1s 7350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% 9.59M 1s 7400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% 3.99M 1s 7450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 3.26M 1s 7500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 3.88M 1s 7550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 3.30M 1s 7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% 2.79M 1s 7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% 3.90M 1s 7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% 3.65M 1s 7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% 4.02M 1s 7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 3.19M 1s 7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 11.3M 1s 7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 4.01M 1s 7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% 1.80M 1s 8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% 1.19M 1s 8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% 1.25M 1s 8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% 1.26M 1s 8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 1.79M 1s 8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 1.29M 1s 8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 1.15M 1s 8300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% 1.55M 1s 8350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% 1.34M 1s 8400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% 1.51M 1s 8450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% 1.63M 1s 8500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 1.97M 1s 8550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 1.81M 1s 8600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 1.83M 1s 8650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% 1.97M 1s 8700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% 1.92M 1s 8750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% 1.38M 1s 8800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% 1.88M 1s 8850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 1.90M 1s 8900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 3.08M 1s 8950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 1.56M 1s 9000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% 2.34M 1s 9050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% 1.66M 1s 9100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% 1.10M 1s 9150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% 2.97M 1s 9200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 1.18M 1s 9250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 1.96M 1s 9300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 3.40M 1s 9350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% 1.70M 1s 9400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% 2.89M 1s 9450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% 2.11M 1s 9500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% 2.04M 1s 9550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 1.54M 1s 9600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 1.68M 1s 9650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 3.19M 1s 9700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% 1.75M 1s 9750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% 1.53M 1s 9800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% 3.20M 1s 9850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% 3.38M 1s 9900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 1.69M 1s 9950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 1.92M 1s 10000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 2.45M 1s 10050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% 1.90M 1s 10100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% 2.60M 1s 10150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% 1.80M 1s 10200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% 2.49M 1s 10250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 3.30M 1s 10300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 2.04M 1s 10350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 3.06M 0s 10400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% 2.84M 0s 10450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% 1.96M 0s 10500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% 3.29M 0s 10550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% 2.21M 0s 10600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 2.54M 0s 10650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 3.15M 0s 10700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 3.55M 0s 10750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% 3.52M 0s 10800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% 1.67M 0s 10850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% 3.06M 0s 10900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% 2.78M 0s 10950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 3.83M 0s 11000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 3.03M 0s 11050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 2.22M 0s 11100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% 3.52M 0s 11150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% 2.82M 0s 11200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 1.75M 0s 11250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 2.68M 0s 11300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 3.04M 0s 11350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% 3.12M 0s 11400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% 3.82M 0s 11450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% 3.34M 0s 11500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% 1.72M 0s 11550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 1.86M 0s 11600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 2.96M 0s 11650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 2.87M 0s 11700K . 100% 534K=4.4s 2011-09-08 11:51:06 (2.60 MB/s) - `/builds/builder/images/PharoCore13.zip' saved [11981893/11981893] Archive: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore13.zip inflating: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore-1.3.changes inflating: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore-1.3.image + /builds/builder/build13.sh -i gforgeCore13 -s update -s pharo/version -o PharoCore-1.3 [version] 1.3 #13302 + /builds/builder/build13.sh -i PharoCore-1.3 -s testrunner -s delHDLintReport -s runalltests -o PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests + zip -r PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.zip PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.changes PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.image updating: PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.changes (deflated 79%) updating: PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.image (deflated 57%) + zip -r PharoCore-1.3.zip PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.changes PharoCore-1.3/PharoV10.sources PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.image updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.changes (deflated 79%) updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoV10.sources (deflated 76%) updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.image (deflated 57%) + sh /builds/builder/pharo-shell-scripts/SavePharoCore13.sh Archiving artifacts Enregistrement des r?sultats des tests ERROR: Failed to archive test reports hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed: <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/ws/> at hudson.remoting.Channel@15e264dd:pharo-build.lille.inria.fr at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:752) at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:738) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser.parse(JUnitParser.java:66) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.parse(JUnitResultArchiver.java:108) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.perform(JUnitResultArchiver.java:120) at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:19) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.perform(AbstractBuild.java:601) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:580) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:558) at hudson.model.Build$RunnerImpl.post2(Build.java:158) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.post(AbstractBuild.java:528) at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1264) at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:46) at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88) at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:122) Caused by: hudson.util.IOException2: Failed to read <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/ws/PharoCore-…> at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:198) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:139) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.<init>(TestResult.java:102) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser$ParseResultCallable.invoke(JUnitParser.java:95) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser$ParseResultCallable.invoke(JUnitParser.java:70) at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2028) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:114) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:270) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Caused by: org.dom4j.DocumentException: Error on line 288 of document file:///builds/workspace/Pharo%20Core%201.3/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/Zinc-Tests-Test.xml : XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. Nested exception: XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:482) at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:264) at hudson.tasks.junit.SuiteResult.parse(SuiteResult.java:94) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:183) ... 14 more Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:195) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:174) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:388) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1414) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.endEntity(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:905) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.endEntity(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityManager.endEntity(XMLEntityManager.java:1393) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityScanner.load(XMLEntityScanner.java:1763) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityScanner.skipChar(XMLEntityScanner.java:1416) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver.next(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:2792) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:648) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.java:140) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:511) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:808) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:737) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:119) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1205) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:522) at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:465) ... 17 more Description set:

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [Vm-dev] jenkins cog - slow monticello on osx

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I did not forget about this, but I did not have enough time yet. Cheers, Doru On 26 Aug 2011, at 14:40, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > On 26 August 2011 13:30, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since a couple of weeks I am working with the Cog VM built on Jenkins: >> https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/view/Cog/job/Cog-Mac-Cocoa/ >> >> Here is a little feedback. It worked quite well, the only problem is that Monticello is really slow in the Moose image. This means that even opening the Monticello Browser takes several seconds. >> >> I thought that this might be induced by something in the Moose image, but if I try with the Elliot's VM (2489), it works blazingly fast. >> > > Thanks for the information, Tudor. > Apparently the difference between Eliot's VM and Cog-Mac-Cocoa that > they are using different frameworks > (Carbon vs Cocoa) > and i don't know too much details about the difference there. > John or Esteban may have better insights how to fix that. > >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal." >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. -- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."

Sept. 8, 2011

[Pharo-project] jenkins mac cogvm misses os process?

by Tudor Girba

Hi, When I try to run OSProcess with the Jenkins version of the CogVM, I get the message that the accessor is missing. When I run the same code with the Cog 2489 from Eliot, it works fine. You can reproduce by executing: OSProcess waitForCommand: 'echo sleeping...; sleep 3; echo I just slept for three seconds' Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "When people care, great things can happen."

Sept. 8, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13302

by Marcus Denker

13302 ----- Issue 4634: Tools menu build by code from Deprecated13 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4634 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Compiling code on a web request; non interactive compilation

by Nick Ager

Thanks Dale that worked for me though I needed to add an accessor #interval in UnknownSelector On 7 September 2011 23:56, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich(a)vmware.com> wrote: > Nick, > > I've had success in tODE with the following: > > [ > main currentSystem > evaluate: aString > in: nil > to: self object > notifying: self notifier > ifFail: [ self error: 'evaluation failed' ] ] > on: UndeclaredVariable , UnknownSelector > do: [ :ex | > (ex isKindOf: UnknownSelector) > ifTrue: [ ^ ex resume: ex name asSymbol ]. > self notify: 'Undeclared variable -->' at: ex > interval first in: aString readStream. > ex resume: nil ] > > `self notifier` is my GUI mock class that intercepts several methods and > for the most part drops things on the floor. > > The exception handler above catches unknown selectors and continues > (basically declaring them as valid), while the UndeclaredVariable exception > ends up inserting a message in the tODE editor...It looks like the mock > class also forwards #notify:at:in: messages ... > > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Nick Ager" <nick.ager(a)gmail.com> > | To: "pharo-project" <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > | Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 3:39:57 PM > | Subject: [Pharo-project] Compiling code on a web request; non > interactive compilation > | > | Hi, > | > | > | I'm sending code from a web-based editor back into Pharo for > | compilation and trying to catch compilation errors and return them > | to the browser. > | > | > | I've created a notifier which implements #notify:at:in: and I pass an > | instance into the compiler in something like: > | > | > | > | compiler := Compiler new. > | compiler from: codeToCompile class: aClass context: nil notifying: > | notifier. > | compiler translate: codeToCompile readStream noPattern: false ifFail: > | [ ... ] > | > | > | Is there a better compiler API to use? > | > | > | I've noticed that I appear to have to mock additional methods in the > | notifier e.g. #selectFrom:to: and #selectionInterval, though still > | find that a morphic UI appears in my image asking for variable > | creation confirmation etc. > | > | > | I then tried using the NonInteractiveUIManager, but found my image > | quit with DNU on > | > NonInteractiveUIManager>>#openDebuggerOn:context:label:contents:fullView:, > | which I duly implemented, but am starting to feel like there must be > | easier way. Have I missed something? > | > | > | Thanks > | > | > | Nick > >

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Find & Replace analysis

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

do you have an account on github? Stef On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:46 AM, HwaJong Oh wrote: > yes! > > HwaJong Oh > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Find-Replace-analysis-tp3797664p3798200.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] How to run cog on Linux

by Marcus Denker

On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 8 September 2011 11:45, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 September 2011 10:14, Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> But, from another end: Is there ready-to-use 64-bit Cog version for linux >>> available? I'm not sure I'll manage to build it myself (despite the fact I >> >> Maybe if we make enough pressure on the comunity... :) Heck, I'm going >> to port FFi or whatever it takes. >> > and JIT code generator, please :) and a X86-64 Version of NativeBoost. ;-) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] How to run cog on Linux

by Igor Stasenko

On 8 September 2011 11:45, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 September 2011 10:14, Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> But, from another end: Is there ready-to-use 64-bit Cog version for linux >> available? I'm not sure I'll manage to build it myself (despite the fact I > > Maybe if we make enough pressure on the comunity... :) Heck, I'm going > to port FFi or whatever it takes. > and JIT code generator, please :) > > -- > Milan Mimica > http://sparklet.sf.net > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Sept. 8, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] 64 bit

by Igor Stasenko

On 8 September 2011 11:43, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 September 2011 09:59, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> All you need is the 32 bits libraries of the OS. >> Why do you want a 64 bits image? > > Because I don't want to have 500MB of libs installed just for squeak. > My religion forbids me, so no point discussing that :P > and my religion forbids me to use 64bit OS. because i don't see what i cannot do with 32bit one :) > > -- > Milan Mimica > http://sparklet.sf.net > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Sept. 8, 2011