- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by petton.nicolas＠gmail.com

> Pharo 2.0 is neither stable nor released thats why the repo is still > empty. Also the 2.0 repo is on SmalltalkHub (http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Packages20/main) and I dont > know whats planned here. Hi! My very short term goal is to add UI support for project contributors and project search to SmalltalkHub. The next step is to finish the scripting API and make SmalltalkHub search engine friendly. BTW: I'm very open to any form of comment/idea/contribution to SmalltalkHub. Cheers, Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Torsten Bergmann

> IMO, what we need is to add a tab "Untrusted" to configurations browser (pointing to MetacelloRepository) and let people choose from there. > done: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6094 OK - but now it does not open in 2.0 since SqS is down and "MetacelloRepository" is not available :( What about closing "MetacelloRepository" on squeaksource and moving it to SS3 as well? Any takers? Thanks T. -- NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone! Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a

June 20, 2012

[Pharo-project] Worskpace question

by Hilaire Fernandes

DHello, I have a question regarding the Workspace when you execute code from there. Let me show with an example: I want to execute code instantiating an empty DrGeo sketch (a morph) then create programmatically content: |canvas| canvas := DrGeoCanvas new. canvas segment: 5@4 to: 10@20. canvas vector: 0@0 to: 2@2. ... The line with DrGeoCanavas creates and opens a new morph of a DrGeo sketch. My problem is: the morph only shows up on screen when the whole Workspace code is executed. I would like the canvas morph to show up when instantiated then get the construction code done step by step in the screen. Is the workspace code executed with higher priority than the user interface thread? Thanks Hilaire -- Dr. Geo -- http://www.drgeo.eu

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Torsten Bergmann

Sven wrote > Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can > easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, > as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way > forward, we should start using that now. > > Sven Ok, then use SS3 meanwhile and maybe switch to smalltalkhub later. So: 1. I created http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20 2. made Scriptmanager working in Pharo 2.0 by switching from ReferenceStream to FLSerializer and FLMaterializer and using SmalltalkEditor instead of ParagraphEditor in "ScriptManager-Core-tbn.17.mcz" Code is cleaner and transition was very easy. Fuel rocks! Since ReferenceStream is not anymore in Pharo 2.0 and old script manager exports can not be used I changed the file extension from *.obj to *.fuel 3. changed the ConfiguratonOfScriptManager to have a new version 1.5. using the new mcz-version 4. added a line stable spec in the config spec for: #'pharo2.0.x' version: '1.5' 5. made a copy of the new ConfiguratonOfScriptManager available in "MetaRepoForPharo20" also 6. opened issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6093 to point Pharo 2.0 to the new config repo In the issue and attached you will find a small changeset that switches the config browser from smalltalk hub to the new SS3 repo So ScriptManager (using Fuel) is now the first package loadable from the config browser in Pharo 2.0. (maybe we should switch topic to "ScriptManager config in 2.0" now ;) Feel free to upload other configs known to work for 2.0 to http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20 Bye T. -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

done: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6094 On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > -1 > > IMO, what we need is to add a tab "Untrusted" to configurations browser (pointing to MetacelloRepository) and let people choose from there. > > Esteban > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:19 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> + 1 >> >>>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20.: >>>> >>>> We can use it too for now. >>>> What is missing is the process behind >>> >>> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >>> >>> Sven >> >> >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

-1 IMO, what we need is to add a tab "Untrusted" to configurations browser (pointing to MetacelloRepository) and let people choose from there. Esteban On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:19 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > + 1 > >>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>> >>> We can use it too for now. >>> What is missing is the process behind >> >> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >> >> Sven > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by Esteban Lorenzano

but we need an inbox for configurations and a method to move thrusted configs to metarepo, otherwise, we will have same mess we have in MetacelloRepository really soon. On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:27 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > esteban > we should let people publish early and fix by hand and in parallel we work on it. > I will try to get a stab at a sketch today > > stef > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> Problem is who validates the packages? (we are working in some automatization here, but it will take time) >> For example: ConfigurationOfSeaside30 in MetaRepoForPharo14 does not loads well (since it loads a stripped version of OB, if you have Nautilus it fails and if not it breaks Shout). >> It is easy to fix, but nobody seems to want... >> >> Esteban >> >> On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>>> >>>> We can use it too for now. >>>> What is missing is the process behind >>> >>> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >>> >>> Sven >> >> > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

esteban we should let people publish early and fix by hand and in parallel we work on it. I will try to get a stab at a sketch today stef On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Problem is who validates the packages? (we are working in some automatization here, but it will take time) > For example: ConfigurationOfSeaside30 in MetaRepoForPharo14 does not loads well (since it loads a stripped version of OB, if you have Nautilus it fails and if not it breaks Shout). > It is easy to fix, but nobody seems to want... > > Esteban > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 20 Jun 2012, at 10:01, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>>> and wonder why we dont use a >>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >>> >>> We can use it too for now. >>> What is missing is the process behind >> >> Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. >> >> Sven > >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Jenkins Pharo 2.0 build failing

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes probably Now a jenkins guy should have a look because I have no clue. I should get a jenkins tutorial > Wasn't that the problem we had last week and we needed a very last vm? > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > From the console output > (https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo%202.0/job/Pharo-2.0/153/console) > it looks like maybe primitiveDirectoryEntry is returning nil... > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Jenkins-Pharo-2-0-build-failing-tp4635571.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >

June 20, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] ScriptManager config in 1.4

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

+ 1 >>> and wonder why we dont use a >>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20. >> >> We can use it too for now. >> What is missing is the process behind > > Let's use that then: it is important that during 2.0 development, you can easily load (validated) metacello configs; many of us are using 2.0 daily, as in eating our own dogfood, if metacello configs + browser are the way forward, we should start using that now. > > Sven

June 20, 2012