- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Integrating OSProcess?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Issue 5796: Integrate OSProcess > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5796 > > Are we doing this? If so, are we forking it (I hope not), or just > integrating updated package versions as Dave releases them? This is an interesting question. I know that Camillo and Damien or somebody else made pipeable working. I suggested that the code is sent to dave for integration in his package. (I do not know if this was done). Now if we really want to have a strong interoperation with the rest of the world either OSProcess has a pharo branch and a nice packaging or may be this is time to fork. I could understand that dave does not have cycles to handle that. Forking in itself is not a bad process when it serves a clear purpose. Look at Pharo. We did it not just for fun (and it was never an easy solution after all the effort we did since years to promote Squeak - books, videos, lecturesâ¦.) but to accomplish a vision. So if we get a really hyper cool system to execute commands like ` in ruby then I want it immediately at the price of forking :) Stef

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] MCSqueaksourceRepository

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 26 Jun 2012, at 20:02, Camillo Bruni wrote: > That saved me so far 39 * 'http://www.squeaksource.com/'.size characters :P Arch, is that a dot (.) between the string and size ?? My eyes hurtâ¦.

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] MCSqueaksourceRepository

by Camillo Bruni

That was a quick hack to support a decent menu item entry when adding a repository. That saved me so far 39 * 'http://www.squeaksource.com/'.size characters :P On 2012-06-26, at 19:58, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > What is the plan for this class? There don't seem to be any mentions of it in > the list archives, it doesn't seem to be used, and doesn't exist in > Squeak... > > Thanks, > Sean > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/MCSqueaksourceRepository-tp4636737.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

June 26, 2012

[Pharo-project] MCSqueaksourceRepository

by Sean P. DeNigris

What is the plan for this class? There don't seem to be any mentions of it in the list archives, it doesn't seem to be used, and doesn't exist in Squeak... Thanks, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/MCSqueaksourceRepository-tp4636737.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Code completion in all tools

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 26 Jun 2012, at 18:40, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > >> Yes, it is red after Part 1 was integrated. It is fixed in Part 2 above, >> which has yet to be integrated. To play with the fix, load >> SLICE-Issue-6146-Code-completion-in-all-tools---Part-2-SeanDeNigris.1 from >> the inbox. > > Works for me in #20160, great work! > I will integrate it now.. -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo and Namespaces

by James Foster

On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:08 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> What happened to the project from GermÃ¡n Leiva >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4I7fSVNX2A > > we do not want class level namespace because this is the mess As the sponsor for GermÃ¡n's project, I have some interest in this topic. StÃ©phane has said a couple times that it is wrong but has never taken time to explain his objections. James Foster

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Code completion in all tools

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 26 Jun 2012, at 18:40, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Yes, it is red after Part 1 was integrated. It is fixed in Part 2 above, > which has yet to be integrated. To play with the fix, load > SLICE-Issue-6146-Code-completion-in-all-tools---Part-2-SeanDeNigris.1 from > the inbox. Works for me in #20160, great work!

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Persistence options

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philippe Marschall < philippe.marschall(a)netcetera.ch> wrote: > On 06/26/2012 02:26 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Philippe Marschall < > > philippe.marschall(a)netcetera.ch> wrote: > > > >> On 06/26/2012 12:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >>> 2012/6/26 Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> > >>> > >>>> Regarding Glorp: how well does the Pharo port work with > >>>> non-Postgresql already: MySQL, SQLServer, Oracle, Firebird, ... ? > >>>> > >>> > >>> They do all work with OpenDBXDriver. Of course you will need the > OpenDBX > >>> library and the database client library. > >>> For Glorp, it is working for: Oracle, MySql, PostgreSQL, SQLite, > >> SqlServer > >>> and ODBC > >> > >> You should probably add that without an mt VM the drivers either block > >> or poll. This is hardly ideal and not comparable to the "native" > >> PostgreS and MySQL drivers that use sockets and don't have these issues. > >> > >> > > Indeed. But it seems that with our "mini-locks" or busy waiting in the > > image side is enough for the real existing users. > > Nobody actually complained about this limitation. > > In fact, in VW, by default, queries are blocking... they are *not* azync > > unless you explicitly tell it. This is because creating threads also take > > time and if most of the queries are fast, then it is even better the > > locking strategy. > > If it works for you that's great. It's just one of these things that you > want to know up front instead of finding out later. > > +1 -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Code completion in all tools

by Sean P. DeNigris

Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote > > It is all red in my 2.0 images too, even the one that I downloaded today > to play with. > Yes, it is red after Part 1 was integrated. It is fixed in Part 2 above, which has yet to be integrated. To play with the fix, load SLICE-Issue-6146-Code-completion-in-all-tools---Part-2-SeanDeNigris.1 from the inbox. Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Code-completion-in-all-tools-tp4636201p4636715.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 26, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Code completion in all tools

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

It is all red in my 2.0 images too, even the one that I downloaded today to play with. On 26 Jun 2012, at 18:08, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> >> Issue 6146: Code completion in all tools - Part 2 >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6146 >> > > Will someone please review this fix. Right now, methods are highlighted in > all-red in the tools... > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Code-completion-in-all-tools-tp4636201p4636701.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

June 26, 2012