- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] bindWith: implementation missing

by Sabine KnÃ¶fel

Hi Ben, ah! thank you, I did not know that. Dynamic arrays are new for me coming from another smalltalk dialect. Greetings Sabine On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You can do > > 'one: {1} two: {2} three: {3}' format: {'1'. '2'. '3'} > > :) > Ben > > On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: > >> Hi Stef, >> >> it is a helper method to put some strings together. >> Instead of using commata, like this >> >> 'one: ','1',' two: ','2',' three: ','3' >> ==>> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' >> >> you use String>>bindWith:with:with: >> >> 'one: %1 two: %2 three: %3' >> bindWith: '1' >> with: '2' >> with: '3' >> >> ==> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' >> >> It is more readable (and writeable:-)) imho. >> >> I know this from ibm Smalltalk/VisualAge and as far as I remember, >> Visual works has it, too. >> >> Greetings >> Sabine >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse >> <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> Hi sabine >>> >>> what is bindWith:? >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I miss String>>bindWith: >>>>>> bindWith: with: >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> in Pharo. Is there a reason for that missing? >>>> Has anyone an implementation for me? >>>> I dont want to reinvent the wheel ;-) >>>> >>>> Greetings >>>> Sabine >>>> >>> >>> >> > >

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] bindWith: implementation missing

by Benjamin

You can do 'one: {1} two: {2} three: {3}' format: {'1'. '2'. '3'} :) Ben On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: > Hi Stef, > > it is a helper method to put some strings together. > Instead of using commata, like this > > 'one: ','1',' two: ','2',' three: ','3' > ==>> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' > > you use String>>bindWith:with:with: > > 'one: %1 two: %2 three: %3' > bindWith: '1' > with: '2' > with: '3' > > ==> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' > > It is more readable (and writeable:-)) imho. > > I know this from ibm Smalltalk/VisualAge and as far as I remember, > Visual works has it, too. > > Greetings > Sabine > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse > <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi sabine >> >> what is bindWith:? >> >> Stef >> >> On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I miss String>>bindWith: >>>>> bindWith: with: >>> etc. >>> >>> in Pharo. Is there a reason for that missing? >>> Has anyone an implementation for me? >>> I dont want to reinvent the wheel ;-) >>> >>> Greetings >>> Sabine >>> >> >> >

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] bindWith: implementation missing

by Sabine KnÃ¶fel

Hi Stef, it is a helper method to put some strings together. Instead of using commata, like this 'one: ','1',' two: ','2',' three: ','3' ==>> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' you use String>>bindWith:with:with: 'one: %1 two: %2 three: %3' bindWith: '1' with: '2' with: '3' ==> 'one: 1 two: 2 three: 3' It is more readable (and writeable:-)) imho. I know this from ibm Smalltalk/VisualAge and as far as I remember, Visual works has it, too. Greetings Sabine On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi sabine > > what is bindWith:? > > Stef > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I miss String>>bindWith: >>>> bindWith: with: >> etc. >> >> in Pharo. Is there a reason for that missing? >> Has anyone an implementation for me? >> I dont want to reinvent the wheel ;-) >> >> Greetings >> Sabine >> > >

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [Jenkins] New issue status for real problems.

by Camillo Bruni

On 2012-07-11, at 15:28, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > On 11.07.2012 15:14, Camillo Bruni wrote: >> On 2012-07-11, at 15:02, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Camillo Bruni wrote: >>> >>>> That was a weird bug... but I fixed it. >>>> We need a Debugger for the announcement system! >>> What do you mean? >>> Because what I know is that debugging the test of announcement can be a pain because registrations are done in another world. >> the problem is, that on:fork: and co are used in the WeakMessageSends >> and thus lose the complete reference to where they came from.. >> >>>> I tried to refactoring a bit so you can get a clue what's going on when stepping through with the debuggerâ¦ >>> What you describe is more related to the state of the debugger and yes it was on our todo to fix the debugger. >> no no, when you do SubscriptionRegistry >> #deliver: >> you create a complete copy of the subscriptions collection. >> This is not very useful, since you can filter them while copying => less items to copy, easier to inspect > > Not threadsafely. ? this has absolutely nothing to do with thread safeness....

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Job Pharo-2.0-Numbered

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

TX!!!! Indeed this was always a pain. On Jul 9, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > if you often download latest development Pharo versions from Jenkins, > you may have a mess in the downloaded files because for all builds the > archives and images have the same name. I created a Jenkins job that > creates an archive named by the latest update number. So you will get > something like this: > > Pharo-2.0-20196.zip > - Pharo-2.0-20196.image > - Pharo-2.0-20196.changes > - PharoV10.sources > > link: https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo%202.0/job/Pharo-2.0-Numbered/ > > -- Pavel >

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [Jenkins] New issue status for real problems.

by Henrik Sperre Johansen

On 11.07.2012 15:14, Camillo Bruni wrote: > On 2012-07-11, at 15:02, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Camillo Bruni wrote: >> >>> That was a weird bug... but I fixed it. >>> We need a Debugger for the announcement system! >> What do you mean? >> Because what I know is that debugging the test of announcement can be a pain because registrations are done in another world. > the problem is, that on:fork: and co are used in the WeakMessageSends > and thus lose the complete reference to where they came from.. > >>> I tried to refactoring a bit so you can get a clue what's going on when stepping through with the debuggerâ¦ >> What you describe is more related to the state of the debugger and yes it was on our todo to fix the debugger. > no no, when you do SubscriptionRegistry >> #deliver: > you create a complete copy of the subscriptions collection. > This is not very useful, since you can filter them while copying => less items to copy, easier to inspect Not threadsafely. Cheers, Henry

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [Jenkins] New issue status for real problems.

by Camillo Bruni

On 2012-07-11, at 15:02, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >> That was a weird bug... but I fixed it. >> We need a Debugger for the announcement system! > What do you mean? > Because what I know is that debugging the test of announcement can be a pain because registrations are done in another world. the problem is, that on:fork: and co are used in the WeakMessageSends and thus lose the complete reference to where they came from.. >> I tried to refactoring a bit so you can get a clue what's going on when stepping through with the debuggerâ¦ > > What you describe is more related to the state of the debugger and yes it was on our todo to fix the debugger. no no, when you do SubscriptionRegistry >> #deliver: you create a complete copy of the subscriptions collection. This is not very useful, since you can filter them while copying => less items to copy, easier to inspect

July 11, 2012

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20202

by Marcus Denker

20202 ----- Issue 6336: deleting a method raises error No package found for selector XXX in class YYY http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6336 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] [Jenkins] New issue status for real problems.

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > That was a weird bug... but I fixed it. > We need a Debugger for the announcement system! What do you mean? Because what I know is that debugging the test of announcement can be a pain because registrations are done in another world. > I tried to refactoring a bit so you can get a clue what's going on when stepping through with the debuggerâ¦ What you describe is more related to the state of the debugger and yes it was on our todo to fix the debugger. > >> Hi, >> >> I added a new tracker status: >> >> HorribleErrorBlockingEverything = World is stopped until this is resolved. >> >> >> Right now this has one: >> >> Issue 6336: deleting a method raises error 'No package found for selector.... >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6336 >> >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> >> > >

July 11, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] bindWith: implementation missing

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi sabine what is bindWith:? Stef On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Sabine KnÃ¶fel wrote: > Hi All, > > I miss String>>bindWith: >>> bindWith: with: > etc. > > in Pharo. Is there a reason for that missing? > Has anyone an implementation for me? > I dont want to reinvent the wheel ;-) > > Greetings > Sabine >

July 11, 2012