- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] now that squeaksource is back...

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, I strongly recommend all of you to move your projects into one of the alternatives: http://smalltalkhub.com http://ss3.gemstone.com the king is dead, long live the king! Esteban

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] now that squeaksource is back...

by Edgar J. De Cleene

On 11/6/12 7:45 AM, "Esteban Lorenzano" <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I strongly recommend all of you to move your projects into one of the > alternatives: > > http://smalltalkhub.com > http://ss3.gemstone.com > > the king is dead, long live the king! > > Esteban Yesterday I start using http://ss3.gemstone.com. Could comment about advantages (or not) of using smalltalkhub.com ? And very thanks.. Edgar

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Can someone fix Squeaksource?

by Max Leske

Also take a look at the LatAm mirror: http://www.dsal.cl/squeaksource/ On 06.11.2012, at 08:53, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > GÃ¶ran, > > On 06 Nov 2012, at 08:48, GÃ¶ran Krampe <goran(a)krampe.se> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I know, sorry for pestering, but is there someone who can? >> >> regards, GÃ¶ran > > There are alternatives to SqueakSource: > > > http://smalltalkhub.com > http://ss3.gemstone.com > http:/mc.stfx.eu > > And you can roll your own solution. > Many people have moved on. > > For existing projects that might be a problem, but normally you have enough versions in your local package cache to either continue working or to start moving to someplace else. > > Regards, > > Sven > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > > >

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Can someone fix Squeaksource?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

GÃ¶ran, On 06 Nov 2012, at 08:48, GÃ¶ran Krampe <goran(a)krampe.se> wrote: > Hi! > > I know, sorry for pestering, but is there someone who can? > > regards, GÃ¶ran There are alternatives to SqueakSource: http://smalltalkhub.com http://ss3.gemstone.com http:/mc.stfx.eu And you can roll your own solution. Many people have moved on. For existing projects that might be a problem, but normally you have enough versions in your local package cache to either continue working or to start moving to someplace else. Regards, Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill

Nov. 6, 2012

[Pharo-project] Can someone fix Squeaksource?

by GÃ¶ran Krampe

Hi! I know, sorry for pestering, but is there someone who can? regards, GÃ¶ran

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource down, are people using something else?

by Tudor Girba

+1 On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes(a)gmail.com>wrote: > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote > > Nicolas is working on a new version of SmalltalkHub to support > > - projects > > - private projects so that companies can have less to worry about > that > > and can use SmalltalkHub for growing their business > > > > The plan is that in two weeks the new version of SHub is out. > > Then we will start to move systematically to SmalltalkHub. > > Cool, so new SmalltalkHub before X > xmas hey :) > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Squeaksource-down-are-people-using-something-else-tp4… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource down, are people using something else?

by Geert Claes

StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote > Nicolas is working on a new version of SmalltalkHub to support > - projects > - private projects so that companies can have less to worry about that > and can use SmalltalkHub for growing their business > > The plan is that in two weeks the new version of SHub is out. > Then we will start to move systematically to SmalltalkHub. Cool, so new SmalltalkHub before X xmas hey :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Squeaksource-down-are-people-using-something-else-tp4… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 6, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource down, are people using something else?

by Paul DeBruicker

I need to proofread before sending. After making the two changes to MetacelloRepositoriesSpec you can just load the Configurations in the normal way e.g. ConfigurationOfSeaside30 load. It takes longer because it checks squeaksource first, and waits on a timeout. If you know you don't want to access squeaksource at all change the #add: method to: MetacelloRepositoriesSpec>>add: aStringOrSpec (aStringOrSpec isString and: [ '*squeaksource*' match: aStringOrSpec ]) ifTrue: [ (aStringOrSpec copy replaceFrom: 8 to: 27 with: 'dsal.cl/squeaksource/' startingAt: 1) addToMetacelloRepositories: self ] ifFalse: [ aStringOrSpec addToMetacelloRepositories: self ]. Which should remove all the references to squeaksource for the configuration and its dependencies which should make loading things go faster as its not waiting on a timeout. . -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Squeaksource-down-are-people-using-something-else-tp4… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 5, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource down, are people using something else?

by Paul DeBruicker

This works but doesn't permanently change the repos in the configuration and you have to have some way to load the configuration in the first place. It just adds more repos during the load process: MetacelloRepositoriesSpec>>add: aStringOrSpec (aStringOrSpec isString and: [ '*squeaksource*' match: aStringOrSpec ]) ifTrue: [ (aStringOrSpec copy replaceFrom: 8 to: 27 with: 'dsal.cl/squeaksource/' startingAt: 1) addToMetacelloRepositories: self ]. aStringOrSpec addToMetacelloRepositories: self MetacelloRepositoriesSpec>>repository:aStringOrSpec self add: aStringOrSpec You should also change the networking timeout to something more tolerable than 30 seconds. e.g. ZnNetworkingUtils defaultSocketStreamTimeout:3 And I've only tried it in Pharo 1.4 and only loaded Seaside3.0.7. So ymmv. StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote > yes we should do that > Do you have one example? > So that I also add it to the metacello chapter? > > Stef > > On Nov 5, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > >> http://dsal.cl/squeaksource/ is the address for the Chilean Squeaksource >> mirror. >> >> >> It'd be nice to update every Metacello config that has a squeaksource >> primary repository to point to the chilean mirror as a secondary source >> (or >> github/smnalltalkhub/ss3 ...). -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Squeaksource-down-are-people-using-something-else-tp4… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 5, 2012

Re: [Pharo-project] How to load MetacelloToolbox

by Francois Stephany

Ok! Thanks David :) Maybe related but I remember seeing that there's a Coral version of OSProcess or something like that. Is the case? Does anyone have managed to get all the tests green in Pharo 1.4 Summer ? On 04/11/12 16:53, David T. Lewis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 04:14:00PM +0100, St?phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> We looked a bit at OSProcess in 2.0 with Mariano on Friday. >>> We tried to have clean loading (i.e., remove FileDirectory references + a couple of other stuff). We also spotted some inconsistencies in the ConfigurationOfOSProcess. >> >> Good! >> >>> I'm going to continue what we started but I don't think I will be able to make all the tests pass (if I remember well, they are not passing in 1.4 summer neither...) >>> >>> Where should I commit the changes? >> >> if you cannot in the os repo you can in the PharoTaskForces but let us wait that david reply. >> > > Hi, > > I am open to suggestions :) > > Doing the work in PharoTaskForces would make sense to me. I don't mind doing > integration work to pull things into the OSProcess repository, as long as we > do not break the tests for OSProcess running in Squeak. But I am quite familiar > with the Squeak environment, so it probably makes sense for me to do the work > of testing that. Overall my time is kind of limited so it is better for me of > others can do the Pharo development. > > In the CommandShell repository, I have a package called "CommandShellPharo" for > compatibility things. Maybe we should have something similar like "OSProcessPharo" > for OSProcess? Note that I am suggesting "CommandShellPharo" and "OSProcessPharo" > rather than "CommandShell-Pharo" and "OSProcess-Pharo" because I still maintain > "CommandShell" and "OSProcess" MCZ packages the repositories, so I would like > to keep any Squeak/Pharo specifics in distinct packages. > > If there was an OSProcessPharo (or similar) package in PharoTaskForces, I can > copy the updates into the OSProcess repo, or give someone the access to do > so (currently Sebastian Sastre and Damien Pollet have developer access). > > Dave > > -- http://tulipemoutarde.be +32 65 709 131

Nov. 5, 2012