- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Screencast: Creating C library bindings with TalkFFI for libgit2

by Stefan Marr

Hi: On 06 Apr 2013, at 19:30, Max Leske wrote: > I recorded a new screencast with a short tutorial on how bindings for libgit2 (or any other library for that matter) can be created using TalkFFI. > > http://vimeo.com/maxleske/talkffibindings I skimmed through it. Looks good. But, I noticed that the video actually stops before generating the bindings :) That makes it feel like there is something missing. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Screencast: Creating C library bindings with TalkFFI for libgit2

by Max Leske

Now it's ready :) On 06.04.2013, at 19:42, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > mmm... to fast > > "Page not found" :( > > Esteban > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> that's cool :) >> >> I just playing with the libgit2 bindings from Stefan :) >> >> Esteban >> >> On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I recorded a new screencast with a short tutorial on how bindings for libgit2 (or any other library for that matter) can be created using TalkFFI. >>> >>> http://vimeo.com/maxleske/talkffibindings >>> >>> (will be available in about an hour) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Max >> > >

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] How to define a ConfigurationOf with a #development version that depends on a baseline?

by stephane ducasse

martin we worked with envy during 8 years for the moose dev on VW and I have the book of joseph. Now what is the process? during dev everybody load bleeding edge of the current maps? when frozen exact ersion are loaded? Stef > In all the discussions about how to manage/organize Smalltalk code - I would like to add, that ENVY (though it's so old) with its config maps, applications, prerequisites is a pretty good example how it works. > > Take a look at the only available ENVY implementation today (VAST) and think about the way they did it in the eighties ... > > The ENVY-(concept - not the implementation) is still a master peace in this area - even when compared with VS or Eclipse - and it supports the power of Smalltalk very much. > > There are questionable parts of ENVY and I do not use these parts of it very often. But even these questionable parts of ENVY have not been better solved by other Smalltalk source code management systems. > > I've repositories, which are around 10 years old - and ALL code is still there, all versions for all different platforms - down to methods differences within a mouse click and the speed within a LAN is so good. > > > Marten > > >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Alexandre Bergel<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> Just a question: Is there any plan for a Metacello 2? >> > <marten.vcf>

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Screencast: Creating C library bindings with TalkFFI for libgit2

by Esteban Lorenzano

mmm... to fast "Page not found" :( Esteban On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > that's cool :) > > I just playing with the libgit2 bindings from Stefan :) > > Esteban > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I recorded a new screencast with a short tutorial on how bindings for libgit2 (or any other library for that matter) can be created using TalkFFI. >> >> http://vimeo.com/maxleske/talkffibindings >> >> (will be available in about an hour) >> >> Cheers, >> Max >

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Screencast: Creating C library bindings with TalkFFI for libgit2

by Esteban Lorenzano

that's cool :) I just playing with the libgit2 bindings from Stefan :) Esteban On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I recorded a new screencast with a short tutorial on how bindings for libgit2 (or any other library for that matter) can be created using TalkFFI. > > http://vimeo.com/maxleske/talkffibindings > > (will be available in about an hour) > > Cheers, > Max

April 6, 2013

[Pharo-project] Screencast: Creating C library bindings with TalkFFI for libgit2

by Max Leske

I recorded a new screencast with a short tutorial on how bindings for libgit2 (or any other library for that matter) can be created using TalkFFI. http://vimeo.com/maxleske/talkffibindings (will be available in about an hour) Cheers, Max

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Resuming Issue Tracker Mailing List

by Benjamin

Since any one can subscribe precisely to want they want, for me it's useless to have a spamming mailing list :) (and one thing less to manage ^^) Ben On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> well, but since I cannot imagine any of this list not subscribing to the other one, I do not see the difference, other than eliminate bureaucracy :) >>> >> I am considering not to. >> >> I think not many people will subscribe. It's just too much. >> > > And if I remember correctly: didn't we do exactly that some years ago and decided to stop? > And that was with the old tracker, the new will generate at least 5 times the amount of mail, > maybe more. > > Marcus > >

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Resuming Issue Tracker Mailing List

by Esteban Lorenzano

oh well... then, if it is just noise, looks like everything will be lost in the stack of useless mails instead what it should be: to promote the discussion of issues. then I vote to not activate anything that will not work anyway :) Esteban On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> well, but since I cannot imagine any of this list not subscribing to the other one, I do not see the difference, other than eliminate bureaucracy :) >> > I am considering not to. > > I think not many people will subscribe. It's just too much. > > Marcus > >

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Resuming Issue Tracker Mailing List

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> well, but since I cannot imagine any of this list not subscribing to the other one, I do not see the difference, other than eliminate bureaucracy :) >> > I am considering not to. > > I think not many people will subscribe. It's just too much. > And if I remember correctly: didn't we do exactly that some years ago and decided to stop? And that was with the old tracker, the new will generate at least 5 times the amount of mail, maybe more. Marcus

April 6, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] Resuming Issue Tracker Mailing List

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > well, but since I cannot imagine any of this list not subscribing to the other one, I do not see the difference, other than eliminate bureaucracy :) > I am considering not to. I think not many people will subscribe. It's just too much. Marcus

April 6, 2013