- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 3.0 TestRunner results

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Benoit St-Jean <bstjean(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I don't know if that's of any help (or if it's been reported before) but here are the results of TestRunner (against all tests) on a Pharo3.0 (Latest update: #30021) image on Windows XP SP3. Can you check with the latest 3.0? it should be 30068 We do run all tests on all three platforms after every change: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/ But this is headless and there can be strange differences between the two. Marcus

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] Pharo 3.0 TestRunner results

by Benoit St-Jean

I don't know if that's of any help (or if it's been reported before) but here are the results of TestRunner (against all tests) on a Pharo3.0 (Latest update: #30021) image on Windows XP SP3. Btw, timezone here is GMT -5:00 (Montreal). See results in attached file. Hope this helps. Â ----------------- Benoit St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero. (Albert Einstein)

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=wi… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Classes.ClassDescriptionTest.testUnCategorizedMethods

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=ma… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Classes.ClassDescriptionTest.testUnCategorizedMethods

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] [regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Classes.ClassDescriptionTest.testUnCategorizedMethods

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30068

by Marcus Denker

30068 ----- 10402 Cannot print TestCase when testSelector is not set https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10402 10421 Move reformatMethodAt: --> #reformat on CompiledMethod https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10421 10422 cleanup unused code Compiler more https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10422 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Traits-MarcusDenker.479 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/SUnit-Core-MarcusDenker.69 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1386 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Compiler-MarcusDenker.405

April 27, 2013

[Pharo-project] Fwd: IWST 2013 Call for papers

by plantec

Begin forwarded message: > From: Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr> > Subject: Fwd: IWST 2013 Call for papers > Date: 27 avril 2013 14:00:40 UTC+02:00 > To: squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > Cc: Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr>, Board ESUG <board(a)esug.org>, Loic Lagadec <lagadec(a)univ-brest.fr> > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr> >> Subject: IWST 2013 Call for papers >> Date: 27 avril 2013 13:59:40 UTC+02:00 >> To: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> Cc: Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)univ-brest.fr>, Loic Lagadec <lagadec(a)univ-brest.fr>, Board ESUG <board(a)esug.org> >> >> Dear smalltalkers, >> >> You will find below the CFP for the International Workshop on Smalltalk Technologies 2013. >> Please disseminate through your own mailing lists. We also hope you will be able to submit some of your contributions. >> >> Best regards, >> Program Co-chairs >> LoÃ¯c Lagadec, Alain Plantec >> Lab-STICC/CNRS, UniversitÃ© de Bretagne Occidentale >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> International Workshop on Smalltalk Technologies 2013 >> >> September 10, 2013 >> Annecy, France >> >> ESUG 2013 joint event >> >> -- Important dates -- >> >> Submission deadline: June 15, 2013 >> >> Notification deadline: July 15, 2013 >> >> Workshop : September 10, 2013 >> >> All accepted papers will be published in ACM DL (ACM In-Cooperation to be confirmed). >> >> >> -- Goals and scopes -- >> >> The goals of the workshop is to create a forum around advances or experience in Smalltalk and to trigger discussions and exchanges of ideas. Participants are invited to submit research articles. We will not enforce any length restriction. However we expect papers of two kinds: >> >> Short position papers describing emerging ideas. >> Long research papers with deeper description of experiments and of research results. >> Topics >> >> We welcome contributions on all aspects, theoretical as well as practical, of Smalltalk related topics such as: >> â¢ Aspect-oriented programming, >> â¢ Design patterns, >> â¢ Experience reports, >> â¢ Frameworks, >> â¢ Implementation, new dialects or languages implemented in Smalltalk, >> â¢ Interaction with other languages, >> â¢ Meta-programming and Meta-modeling, >> â¢ Tools >> >> Links home page: http://www.esug.org/Conferences/2013/InternationalWorkshop >> >> Publication Both submissions and final papers must be prepared using the ACM SIGPLAN 10 point format. Templates for Word and LaTeX are available at http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigplan/authorInformation.htm. This site also contains links to useful informations on how to write effective submissions. >> >> Program chairs LoÃ¯c Lagadec and Alain Plantec (LabSticc CACS/CNRS, University of Brest, France) >> > >

April 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Ann] TxText. New text editor done!

by Denis Kudriashov

2013/4/27 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > 2013/4/27 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > >> 2013/4/27 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> >> >>> Nice! >>> Denis did you see the benchs that doru tried to see if we can use Rubric? >>> Because it is interesting to see if we can load and manipulate really >>> large file. >>> >>> Now it would be good that alain releases Rubric with a stable version >>> and check how to take advantage of the new TextMorph. >>> >>> I saw his post. >> And just now I check this test with TxTextMorph with unwrapped strategy. >> Similar results like at Rubric test. nearly 30 secs. >> I generate 50 mb string with almost million lines: >> TxModel building get 10 seconds. Layout building get 20 seconds. >> >> If you want repeat this test you should not use #newTextContents: method. >> You should build text model manually and put it at morph by #textModel:. >> #newTextContents: method should be optimized. When I try test with >> #newTextContents: it was hang on very long time and I stop it. >> >> > And now text editing has no optimization. After each edit full text layout > rebuilt. So pressing some character in our test take another 20 seconds. > It should be just fixed > And #drawOn: method should be optimized too. I think it is not difficult task. Now each line try to draw on canvas. But morph should draw only visible lines > >> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> I'm happy to announce that new text editor based on new text model done. >>> You can load configuration from >>> http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~sig/TxText. Last version: 0.6. >>> See class side example methods. >>> >>> What available now in TxTextMorph: >>> - cursor navigation with move left, right, down, up and mouse click >>> - text selection with move left, right, down, up and mouse movement >>> - editing by keyboard input >>> - text wrap >>> - #addCursor/#removeCursor >>> - #enableSelection. >>> - #beEditable >>> - all keyboard interractions based on shortcuts >>> >>> Little details about navigation and editing: >>> There is TxEditor object which know about cursor position and text >>> selection. Text morph ask him to perform all navigation and editing >>> behaviour. >>> It has cursorMode which knows how to change editor selection when cursor >>> moved. Editor delegates all move actions to cursorPosition by >>> #doesNotUnderstand method. It is simplified adding new navigation methods. >>> For example see TxTextMorph>>enableSelection >>> >>> aTxTextMorph>>moveEditorOn: Character arrowLeft by: #moveLeft. >>> >>> This expression adds two shortcuts: to move editor left and to select >>> text left (when selectionModeModifier active). >>> >>> What next: >>> - Remains standart navigation and editing features like copy/paste, move >>> to line end, to text end and etc. >>> - halo menu items to edit text and layout properties >>> - Edit decorators to get mask behaviour like "(999)***-**-**", pretty >>> numbers like "1'000'000", secrete field like "***" >>> - Value specs to filter inserted text (only numbers, only english and >>> etc) >>> >>> There are some problems with focus behaviour now. And drawing text morph >>> with transparent back color works bad. It will be cool if somebody with >>> good knowledge at this topics can fix it. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> >> >

April 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Ann] TxText. New text editor done!

by Denis Kudriashov

With wrapping mode layout building take 27 seconds which is not too much than without wrapping. But it get 3.5 times more layout lines. (230 000 lines without wrapping and 750 000 with wrapping in my test) 2013/4/27 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > 2013/4/27 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > >> 2013/4/27 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> >> >>> Nice! >>> Denis did you see the benchs that doru tried to see if we can use Rubric? >>> Because it is interesting to see if we can load and manipulate really >>> large file. >>> >>> Now it would be good that alain releases Rubric with a stable version >>> and check how to take advantage of the new TextMorph. >>> >>> I saw his post. >> And just now I check this test with TxTextMorph with unwrapped strategy. >> Similar results like at Rubric test. nearly 30 secs. >> I generate 50 mb string with almost million lines: >> TxModel building get 10 seconds. Layout building get 20 seconds. >> > > I found that Tudor wrote about 15 million lines. > So I change my test and now I have OutOfMemotyWarning. It raised on > splitting given string on lines. Obviously building text model should be > optimized by work with stream. > >

April 27, 2013

Re: [Pharo-project] [Ann] TxText. New text editor done!

by stephane ducasse

Thanks for your energy, alain told me that he will also have a look. This is good to see movement from this front. Having a scalable texteditor with rich editing capabilities (icons, line number) is important for Moose and synectique. Also the new generation code browser will benefit from this new TextMorph. Stef On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/4/27 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> > 2013/4/27 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> > Nice! > Denis did you see the benchs that doru tried to see if we can use Rubric? > Because it is interesting to see if we can load and manipulate really large file. > > Now it would be good that alain releases Rubric with a stable version and check how to take advantage of the new TextMorph. > > I saw his post. > And just now I check this test with TxTextMorph with unwrapped strategy. Similar results like at Rubric test. nearly 30 secs. > I generate 50 mb string with almost million lines: > TxModel building get 10 seconds. Layout building get 20 seconds. > > I found that Tudor wrote about 15 million lines. > So I change my test and now I have OutOfMemotyWarning. It raised on splitting given string on lines. Obviously building text model should be optimized by work with stream. >

April 27, 2013