- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

No Internationalization (nor Multilingual) Project in bug tracker

by Nicolas Cellier

Like in Squeak/Trunk I want to push UTF8 encoding in .mcz/snapshot/source.stand want to first create an InvalidUTF8 exception (Error) - so as to fallback to legacy encoding in error handling. What project do you suggest for classifying the fogbugz entry? Nicolas

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Camille Teruel

> Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange combinations... If #"whatever"symbol evaluates to #symbol, 123"blabla"456 doesn't parse in my image. Anyway, the first seems quite useless to me just like this other cases (also covered by test) like: ## # ## # # ## # asd that evaluates to #asd and: #123.456 that evaluates to 123.456 Camille

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Igor Stasenko

On 29 May 2013 20:55, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 May 2013 19:43, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I see no harm in that. >> >> It might be misleading, > > Well, that's _exactly_ the harm in that. > so don't write it like that :) I actually like the fact that i can put comment anywhere i want, and it doesn't disrupts the parser. Of course, it turns to be a problem, when you think that something must be represented by a single token but it cannot, because it split by comment. But to me it is much more important that i can put comment anywhere i like, without thinking "oh.. it may not compile". > frank > >> but who in his/her sane mind would write like that? > >> Apparently the parser removes all the comments before doing anything else. >> >> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >> >> 2013/5/29 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice(a)gmail.com> >>> >>> Ah, nice, we can write in french ;) 221" millions "355" mille "799 >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/29 Gisela Decuzzi <giseladecuzzi(a)gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/5/29 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange >>>> combinations... >>>> >>>> I think this shouldn't be valid but since there are tests verifying the >>>> behavior maybe there was a reason (more than the scanner we are using is >>>> skipping all the comments without letting the parser decide) >>>> >>> >> > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

May 29, 2013

New mailing list on Gmane

by Jimmie Houchin

Hello, I frequently read the Pharo list on Gmane. Since the mailing list move to a new server, none of the messages are being sent to Gmane. There have been no new messages since May 15. It would be nice if the service to Gmane could be resumed. And if possible to populate the missed messages. Just wanted to let the list know. Thanks. Jimmie

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Frank Shearar

On 29 May 2013 19:43, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I see no harm in that. > > It might be misleading, Well, that's _exactly_ the harm in that. frank > but who in his/her sane mind would write like that? > Apparently the parser removes all the comments before doing anything else. > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2013/5/29 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice(a)gmail.com> >> >> Ah, nice, we can write in french ;) 221" millions "355" mille "799 >> >> >> 2013/5/29 Gisela Decuzzi <giseladecuzzi(a)gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/29 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> >>>> >>>> How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? >>> >>> >>> Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange >>> combinations... >>> >>> I think this shouldn't be valid but since there are tests verifying the >>> behavior maybe there was a reason (more than the scanner we are using is >>> skipping all the comments without letting the parser decide) >>> >> >

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Esteban A. Maringolo

I see no harm in that. It might be misleading, but who in his/her sane mind would write like that? Apparently the parser removes all the comments before doing anything else. Esteban A. Maringolo 2013/5/29 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice(a)gmail.com> > Ah, nice, we can write in french ;) 221" millions "355" mille "799 > > > 2013/5/29 Gisela Decuzzi <giseladecuzzi(a)gmail.com> > >> >> 2013/5/29 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> >> >>> How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? >> >> >> Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange >> combinations... >> >> I think this shouldn't be valid but since there are tests verifying the >> behavior maybe there was a reason (more than the scanner we are using is >> skipping all the comments without letting the parser decide) >> >> >

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Nicolas Cellier

Ah, nice, we can write in french ;) 221" millions "355" mille "799 2013/5/29 Gisela Decuzzi <giseladecuzzi(a)gmail.com> > > 2013/5/29 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> > >> How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? > > > Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange > combinations... > > I think this shouldn't be valid but since there are tests verifying the > behavior maybe there was a reason (more than the scanner we are using is > skipping all the comments without letting the parser decide) > >

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo & Redis?

by Sebastian Sastre

doesn't seem to. Anyone has any objection on comiting a copy of that in smalltalkhub so it stays available?? sebastian o/ On May 28, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Sebastian Sastre <SEBASTIAN(a)FLOWINGCONCEPT.COM> wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've seen here a reference in http://redis.io/clients to this Smalltalk client: > > http://www.squeaksource.com/@kv_Jds-P7FbzciwZ/xU6A7ylR > > The last commit is kind of old (2011) > > 1. Are you using it? > > 2. Is anybody interested in maintaining a Redis Pharo client here? > > Why Redis you might ask? > > Well, it's fast and has a very interesting feature: Notifications > > With notifications you can subscribe observers and publish object events (I'll leave the rest to your smalltalker imagination) on persisted objects. > > This opens many possibilities in real-time smalltalk based apps that scales nice. > > sebastian > > o/ >

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Gisela Decuzzi

2013/5/29 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> > How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? Yes the same... 1"sdads"2 is interpreted as 12 and all estrange combinations... I think this shouldn't be valid but since there are tests verifying the behavior maybe there was a reason (more than the scanner we are using is skipping all the comments without letting the parser decide)

May 29, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] #"asdada"B is a valid symbol?

by Frank Shearar

On 29 May 2013 16:30, Gisela Decuzzi <giseladecuzzi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think so but right now is interpreted as: #B. > Do we want this behavior? How does 1"sdads"2 evaluate? To 12? (I doubt we want comments within a token! self fo"this is a very long comment obscuring a simple message send"o !) frank

May 29, 2013