- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] The interrupt semaphore

by Igor Stasenko

On 7 June 2013 16:33, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: > In any case, I'd understand why, but we still have that semaphore installed > in the special objects array, and code in the VM for handling it... > There is a single word, explaining everything: legacy. :) > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> We are not using it? >> >> Why interruption is made by the event fetcher process? >> >> Guille > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

June 7, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared

June 7, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=ma… 1 regressions found. Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] For 2.0: links point to latest build on pharp-project.org

by Camillo Bruni

New links available: http://files.pharo.org/image/30/Pharo-Image-3.0-latest.zip http://files.pharo.org/image/20/Pharo-Image-2.0-latest.zip I'm fixing the VM links to http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/$PLATFORM/Pharo-VM-$PLATFORM-latest.zip and changing all files $VM_NAME-$PLATFORM-$NUMBER.zip to $NUMBER.zip like that we are more consistent! On 2013-06-07, at 16:19, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I changed all links to point to the latest 2.0 build on files.pharo.org > > Reason: > > -> We are fixing bugs, yet people downloading 2.0 do not see the fix > -> We had multiple times that people wasted quite some effort re-reporting bugs > that are already fixed. > > Notes > -> the file name "latest.zip" is not good for the image. It should encode that it is the image only and the version number maybe? > -> I did not change any VM related download links, but I think we should do the same there. > > > Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] The interrupt semaphore

by Guillermo Polito

In any case, I'd understand why, but we still have that semaphore installed in the special objects array, and code in the VM for handling it... On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com>wrote: > We are not using it? > > Why interruption is made by the event fetcher process? > > Guille >

June 7, 2013

The interrupt semaphore

by Guillermo Polito

We are not using it? Why interruption is made by the event fetcher process? Guille

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Necessity of TDD with Smalltalk

by btc＠openinworld.com

June 7, 2013

For 2.0: links point to latest build on pharp-project.org

by Marcus Denker

Hi, I changed all links to point to the latest 2.0 build on files.pharo.org Reason: -> We are fixing bugs, yet people downloading 2.0 do not see the fix -> We had multiple times that people wasted quite some effort re-reporting bugs that are already fixed. Notes -> the file name "latest.zip" is not good for the image. It should encode that it is the image only and the version number maybe? -> I did not change any VM related download links, but I think we should do the same there. Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving PostgresV2 from SS to Shub. Any objection?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 7, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was going to commit something on PostgresV2 in SS but then I though it is a good opportunity to moved it to SmalltalkHub. > > Any objection? Pleasssssssseeeeeeeeeee You can put it in Pharo Extras Setf > > Thanks, > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving PostgresV2 from SS to Shub. Any objection?

by phil＠highoctane.be

If we could get a full DBXTalk solution for Pharo 2.0, it would be awesome. Phil On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 07 Jun 2013, at 14:44, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I was going to commit something on PostgresV2 in SS but then I though it > is a good opportunity to moved it to SmalltalkHub. > > > > Any objection? > > Nope. Good idea ;-) > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Mariano > > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > >

June 7, 2013