- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Modification on CollectionsExtensions

by Sean P. DeNigris

Tudor Girba-2 wrote > We will release Moose at the end of this month and we will move to Pharo > 3.0 I'm impressed! Did you move Moose to Pharo 2.0 before it was released? I have been hesitant to move my projects to the alpha/beta versions because we are making so much progress (i.e. breaking things, lol)... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-dev-Modification-on-CollectionsExtensions-tp469… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Modification on CollectionsExtensions

by Tudor Girba

First, thanks for looking at CollectionsExtensions. But, please do not remove flatCollect: yet! This is used everywhere in Moose. We will release Moose at the end of this month and we will move to Pharo 3.0, and then we can do what we want. Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow." On 12.06.2013, at 17:41, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > but pay attention because in 2.0 you will need it. > :) > > On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Guillaume Larcheveque <guillaume.larcheveque(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok so if everyone agree I will remove the flatCollect: method from CollectionExtensions since Sebastian made the correction in Pharo 3.0. >> >> >> 2013/6/12 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >>> >>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Sebastian Tleye <stleye(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ok, i understood, >>>> >>>> Discussing with Marcus we believe that it would be better to keep Collecition>>gather: and add Collection>>flatCollect: (with the same implementation) and put a comment in gather: saying that is kept for compatibility purposes. >>>> >>>> flatCollect: will be included in Pharo and will be removed from CollectionExtensions. >>> >>> + 1 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Guillaume Larcheveque >

June 13, 2013

Jenkins build is back to stable : Pharo-2.0-Tests Â» run 1,vm,linux #250

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

See <https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=lin…>

June 13, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/./label=li… 1 regressions found. NetworkTests.Kernel.NetNameResolverTest.testLocalHostName

June 13, 2013

[update 3.0] #30198

by Marcus Denker

30198 ----- 10902 Add FileReference >> contents https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10902 10895 DateModel Enhancement: add getter & better class comment https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10895 10899 Fix FontSet class>>#fontName https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10899 10898 substring refactoring broke freetype loading https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10898 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Widgets-MarcusDenker.197… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Graphics-Fonts-MarcusDenker.7… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/FreeType-MarcusDenker.619.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/FileSystem-Tests-Core-MarcusD… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/FileSystem-Core-MarcusDenker.… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.170.diff

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30198

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 13, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> This update was never published as i broke the build (no idea why, we should have a look). > > > I've just found a bug in previous release: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10903/Bad-use-of-includesSubstring > (and pushed a fix). Could this be related? > could be, but unlikely as this code normally is not calledâ¦ Marcus

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30198

by Damien Cassou

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > This update was never published as i broke the build (no idea why, we should have a look). I've just found a bug in previous release: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10903/Bad-use-of-includesSubstring (and pushed a fix). Could this be related? -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [update 3.0] #30198

by Marcus Denker

This update was never published as i broke the build (no idea why, we should have a look). I have reopened the issue, the next update will be again #198 On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > 30198 > ----- > > 6989 Inspect should be silent > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6989 > Diff information: > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-MarcusDenker.1140.diff >

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] [squeak-dev] RE: Trie data structure

by Frank Shearar

On 13 June 2013 15:05, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > Benoit wrote: >>Here's a simple Trie implementation I'm giving to the Smalltalk community.? It's been tested with Pharo 1.3 but it >should work without any modification on Squeak. > > Nice, thank you. > >>http://endormitoire.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/trie/ >> >>Awaiting your comments/suggestions/complaints/ideas. >> >>I'm planning on porting it to other Smalltalks and the latest Pharos (2.x and 3.x). > > Tests run in Pharo 3.0 And in Squeak 4.5. I don't like that it's in a package called 'Collections-Trie' though: it's certainly an accurate name, but it would make the Collections package dirty. I don't know if Pharo split up its Collections package? frank >>P.S.? I'm providing the fileOuts since I wasn't sure on where to store this code : SmalltalkHub/ss3/elsewhere ? > > Yes. Pick one and commit. Both smalltalkhub and ss3 work fine. Moving to another location is trivial. > > Stephan

June 13, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Trie data structure

by Stephan Eggermont

Benoit wrote: >Here's a simple Trie implementation I'm giving to the Smalltalk community.? It's been tested with Pharo 1.3 but it >should work without any modification on Squeak. Nice, thank you. >http://endormitoire.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/trie/ > >Awaiting your comments/suggestions/complaints/ideas. > >I'm planning on porting it to other Smalltalks and the latest Pharos (2.x and 3.x). Tests run in Pharo 3.0 >P.S.? I'm providing the fileOuts since I wasn't sure on where to store this code : SmalltalkHub/ss3/elsewhere ? Yes. Pick one and commit. Both smalltalkhub and ss3 work fine. Moving to another location is trivial. Stephan

June 13, 2013