- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[update 3.0] #30443

by Marcus Denker

30443 ----- 11757 NautilusMCBindings misses a reset method https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11757 11758 Small fix to make FileContentBrowser work again https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11758 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-FilePackage-MarcusDenk… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Nautilus-MarcusDenker.550.diff

Oct. 3, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Monticello requiring network access to save a package in a local repository?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Yes, that is what Monticello does on a save: check for potential name conflicts in all linked repositories. It is just the way it is. It is not a 100% foolproof way to guarantee uniqueness, but it will help in certain cases. We once thought about making this check optional (and a setting). One way out might be to remove all but the package-cache from the repositories linked to your package, but I haven't tried. On 03 Oct 2013, at 15:58, "phil(a)highoctane.be" <phil(a)highoctane.be> wrote: > Hello, > > Monticello goes fetching a unique number in the previous version of a given package on Smallatkhub and that means requiring network access. > > Why is it so? > > I was working without network access and this bite me. > > I was able to get out of trouble with my Phone as an access point. > > But for some scenarios (w/ security and no external network access) this is really a pain. > > Also, the fact that I had to do a Cmd-. to get out of this is annyoying. > > Clues? > > Phil

Oct. 3, 2013

ReloadByMonticello job green again

by Pavel Krivanek

Hi, we are again able to load the Morphic and tools to the shrinked image. . https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Pharo-Kernel-3.0/job/PharoKerne… Cheers, -- Pavel

Oct. 3, 2013

Monticello requiring network access to save a package in a local repository?

by phil＠highoctane.be

Hello, Monticello goes fetching a unique number in the previous version of a given package on Smallatkhub and that means requiring network access. Why is it so? I was working without network access and this bite me. I was able to get out of trouble with my Phone as an access point. But for some scenarios (w/ security and no external network access) this is really a pain. Also, the fact that I had to do a Cmd-. to get out of this is annyoying. Clues? Phil

Oct. 3, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=ma… 4 regressions found. Tests.Monticello.MCSerializationTest.testStSerialization Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testCommentWithoutStyle Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testMethodWithStyle Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testInstanceSideMethodsWithNilKeyInLastLiteral

Oct. 3, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=wi… 4 regressions found. Tests.Monticello.MCSerializationTest.testStSerialization Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testCommentWithoutStyle Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testMethodWithStyle Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testInstanceSideMethodsWithNilKeyInLastLiteral

Oct. 3, 2013

[regression reporter]regression occurred

by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=li… 4 regressions found. Tests.Monticello.MCSerializationTest.testStSerialization Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testCommentWithoutStyle Tests.Monticello.MCStReaderTest.testMethodWithStyle Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testInstanceSideMethodsWithNilKeyInLastLiteral

Oct. 3, 2013

[update 3.0] #30442

by Marcus Denker

Oct. 3, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo hangout analysis

by Esteban A. Maringolo

The hangout took place during my regular working hours, so for those like me that must work according to a schedule it wasn't easy to do much more than "radio listening" and some chat. Anyhow, I'm happy with the outcome. I think more hangouts should be done, one per month is few. Maybe two would be a good number, each scheduled to make it possible for those living past Greenwich, and those living a few hours behind it like us. It will require some time to get speed and used to the tools, but I think it will be worth the effort. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2013/10/2 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > Hi, > > So well... the first Pharo Hangout Session has passed and in my opinion it was not terribly bad :) > There were present people who usually does not show up in the sprints for obvious reasons (they live far from Lille, like in Argentina). > And we more or less worked in fixing bugs and talked about Pharo development, etc. > > No one there worked like that before and we need to acquire more experience to do the kind of things that makes our team work better: we need to learn how to explain our stuff, how to share our screen and do things, etc. > > But I think as a first experience it was very positive. > At least, we could hang (out ;)) and share working context with people that we usually don't. > And I think all presents are a bit more aware of Pharo process now (not a lot more aware, but a bit :) > > So... we will repeat this experience once a month, because I think they are very positive and we will improve them with practice. > But I also would like to add other ideas that came to my mind while sprinting. > > For example, I think we succeed in create the feeling of "all of us are working together" that a sprint has, but we failed in pair program. So I would like to try remote-pair program too. > How can we manage it? well, instead an open sprint, we declare "I want to work on this issue", and we invite people to join... and we join two or three with same interest into a shared screen and with real participation. > > What do you think? > > cheers, > Esteban

Oct. 3, 2013

[update 3.0] #30441

by Marcus Denker

Oct. 3, 2013