- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[update 3.0] #30466

by Marcus Denker

30466 ----- 7416 SystemNavigation should return CompiledMethod or RGMethodDefinition https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7416 11829 Small critic cleanup in Network https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11829 11830 Small Critic Cleanup in System-Support https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11830 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-Support-MarcusDenker.9… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Network-Url-MarcusDenker.93.d… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Network-RFC822-MarcusDenker.9… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Network-Mail-MarcusDenker.27.… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Network-MIME-MarcusDenker.61.… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Network-Kernel-MarcusDenker.9… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Unordered-MarcusD…

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Metacello preview in Pharo 2.0

by Christophe Demarey

Le 9 oct. 2013 Ã 13:25, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > does it integrate for real? As you can see here: https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/view/Versions%20and%20Dependencies/job/MetacelloPr… > are the other tests green? I created another test to run all tests in Pharo: https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/view/Versions%20and%20Dependencies/job/MetacelloPr… They are a lot of tests failed in OSProcess but the OSProcess tests are already red: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/OSProcess/PHARO=20,VERSION=stabl… To summarize, the problem is more on the OSProcess dependency that will come with MetacelloPreview.

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShortRunArray not in Pharo 3.0 anymore, leading to problems with FFI-Kernel-tbn.25

by phil＠highoctane.be

Not directly related, I am loading my full stack and it includes both projets. Speaking of which, ConfigurationOfSeaside3 understands Pharo3.x things I think but loaded with a 2.x compatibility trick, fails (like in loading ConfigurationOfGrease which loads ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser, which fails miserably. So, if a config is available in for 3.x, metacello platforms should be 3.x and 2.x if not there yet. Well, kind of difficult to use Pharo3 with its fixes when one wants to use the other projects. Loads to Gofer and manual loads to do to get out of this. Phil

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] SmalltalkHub red

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Do you know who is working with grease? It doesn't sound too hard to solve this. Uko On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > the problem is that grease redefined the message packages on classes. > So what can we do? > packages is not a message that should be changed like class. > > Stef > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> So SmalltalkHub went red for about a week ago https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SmalltalkHub/. The issue is related to grease stuff, because while configuration is loading, you get "MessageNotUnderstood: GRPackage>>includesSelector:ofClassName:". Any quick ideas how this can be solved, or I should investigate it from 0. >> >> Cheers. >> Uko > >

Oct. 9, 2013

Pharo VM on Ubuntu PPA is ok now

by Damien Cassou

Dear Pharo users on Ubuntu, there was a problem with the VM embedded in the ubuntu packages on the PPA (https://launchpad.net/~pharo/+archive/stable/) This bug has been solved! The bug was in the VM source code which has been fixed by upstream. Best, -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShortRunArray not in Pharo 3.0 anymore, leading to problems with FFI-Kernel-tbn.25

by Marcus Denker

On Oct 9, 2013, at 4:18 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > Snashotcello not loading in 3.0 as well and the 2.x trick. > But how is that related to FFI? > Also, Gofer gives me some headaches when loading from directories. > > Phil > > - > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:22 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > >> There is an "ExternalObject class >>initialize" that attemps to place itself after ShortRunArray, which isn't there, leasgin to "Error: nil cannot be found in Smalltalk dictionary". > >> > >> Just to let you know, > >> > > > > Do we support non-nativeBoost FFI in Pharo3? > > not yet > > > > > > >> (Was testing the loading of my confs in 3.0 with the 2.0 monticello trick". > >> > >> Phil > > > > >

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShortRunArray not in Pharo 3.0 anymore, leading to problems with FFI-Kernel-tbn.25

by phil＠highoctane.be

Snashotcello not loading in 3.0 as well and the 2.x trick. Also, Gofer gives me some headaches when loading from directories. Phil - On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:22 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > >> There is an "ExternalObject class >>initialize" that attemps to place > itself after ShortRunArray, which isn't there, leasgin to "Error: nil > cannot be found in Smalltalk dictionary". > >> > >> Just to let you know, > >> > > > > Do we support non-nativeBoost FFI in Pharo3? > > not yet > > > > > > >> (Was testing the loading of my confs in 3.0 with the 2.0 monticello > trick". > >> > >> Phil > > > > >

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Please contributors fill up this form...

by Yuriy Tymchuk

On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 09 Oct 2013, at 14:38, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is the mail display on the website a joke on purpose ? >> >> For example, I get on my screen: >> $@ join: #('guillermopolito' 'gmail.com') >> instead of: >> guillermopolito(a)gmail.com >> >> I don't know if it is nice to have that non smalltalker may read this page and my not understand. > > Yes, it is both a (Smalltalk) joke and a way to obfuscate the email address. But many people, including Smalltalkers, seem to be confused by it. > > I can easily change this, but to what ? I use this thing http://www.albionresearch.com/misc/obfuscator.php with a JS option. > >> Best, >> >> 2013/10/9 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> >>> >>> >>> On 09 Oct 2013, at 13:34, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys >>>> >>>> I would like to get >>>> contributors.pharo.org a bit more representative of Pharo. >>>> >>>> We should have Previous contributors and enhance the current list. >>> >>> Excellent idea! >>> >>>> Can you please reply to this mail >>>> >>>> PharoContributor new >>>> name: 'Esteban Lorenzano'; >>>> id: 'estebanlm'; >>>> email: 'estebanlm(a)gmail.com'; >>>> website: 'http://smallworks.eu'; >>>> description: 'Pharo core team. Contributor of several projects, including Kernel, DBXTalk, Voyage, Mars, etc. Also I work on the VM.'; >>>> image: 'http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/193af464509ae8fbcc04abad70b72fc0?s=120'; >>>> yourself >>>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>> >>> The full old list was initially included, but the info there might be out of date. Concerning the template, it can be simpler, like this: >>> >>> PharoContributor new >>> name: 'Esteban Lorenzano'; >>> email: 'estebanlm(a)gmail.com'; >>> website: 'http://smallworks.eu'; >>> description: 'Pharo core team. Contributor of several projects, including Kernel, DBXTalk, Voyage, Mars, etc. Also I work on the VM.'; >>> yourself. >>> >>> More specifically, the #id is not needed unless your name contains non-ASCII characters, it becomes 'estebanlorenzano' in this case. If there is a gravatar linked to the email address that you specified, it will be picked up automatically. >>> >>> BTW, I would simply change the old contributors page, like we did with consultants page: the list is pretty complete and it might force more people to update their info. >>> >>> Sven >>> >>> >>> >>> > >

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShortRunArray not in Pharo 3.0 anymore, leading to problems with FFI-Kernel-tbn.25

by Esteban Lorenzano

On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:22 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > >> There is an "ExternalObject class >>initialize" that attemps to place itself after ShortRunArray, which isn't there, leasgin to "Error: nil cannot be found in Smalltalk dictionary". >> >> Just to let you know, >> > > Do we support non-nativeBoost FFI in Pharo3? not yet > > >> (Was testing the loading of my confs in 3.0 with the 2.0 monticello trick". >> >> Phil >

Oct. 9, 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShortRunArray not in Pharo 3.0 anymore, leading to problems with FFI-Kernel-tbn.25

by phil＠highoctane.be

Dunno but OpenDBX uses FFI. No databases, well,... On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:22 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: > > > There is an "ExternalObject class >>initialize" that attemps to place > itself after ShortRunArray, which isn't there, leasgin to "Error: nil > cannot be found in Smalltalk dictionary". > > > > Just to let you know, > > > > Do we support non-nativeBoost FFI in Pharo3? > > > > (Was testing the loading of my confs in 3.0 with the 2.0 monticello > trick". > > > > Phil > >

Oct. 9, 2013