- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo in Rasbian ?

by Damien Pollet

On 22 May 2014 17:07, Chris Muller <asqueaker(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> So can we respect the work of people? > > I do! I never referred anyone else's work as "full of *&%^&%"... I don't mean to add fuel to the fire, butâ¦ <begin part where I do> there is a nuance between work = efforts of a person and work = software artifact that resulted from many efforts over a long period Software rot happens, even with well-intentioned and skilled developers, and there is no disrespect in calling it for what it is. -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clarifications with small lint rules

by Jan Vrany

No. not really. There are just 4 implementors only, in RBBasicLintRule, RBTransformationRule and RBCompositeLintRule. Maybe I've added something to environment, I don't really remember, it's a long time ago when worked on this and since then it just works :-) If you'd like more convenient way to browse the code, you may want to download and run St/X and look at it in browser: https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/projects/stx-jv/wiki/Download SmallLint is pre-loaded. Jan On 22/05/14 16:18, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: > Hi Jan, > > in #failedMethods: you use #failedMethodsInto: which is abstract. So the idea is that in each rule gets methods from itâs result? > > Uko > > > On 22 May 2014, at 17:03, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > >> Yeah, >> >> all the refatory stuff has weird API and SmallLint ones are of the weirdest. The design is bit unfortunate. >> You may want to have a look how I did it: >> >> RBLintRule>>failedMethods, RBLintRule>>failedClasses >> >> source code's here: >> http://www.exept.de/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/stx/goodies/refactoryBrowser/lint/RB… >> >> Best, Jan >> >> >> On 22/05/14 15:49, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> so Iâm experimenting with rules, and I have one simple question: how do I get a collection of items from some environment which violate some rule? >>> >>> i know that I can send #runOnEnvironment: to the rule itself and then it will use a checker to run the rule on the environment. But later I end up with the rule itself. I know that I can get all atomic rules from composite rule by sending #leaves, and there is #result method that returns environment. But there is no single way to get items from environment, and all accessors are environment-specific. Am I doing something wrong? Because Iâve spent half of a day to find out how to run a rule and get violations :). >>> >>> Cheers. >>> Uko >>> >> >> > > >

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clarifications with small lint rules

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Hi Jan, in #failedMethods: you use #failedMethodsInto: which is abstract. So the idea is that in each rule gets methods from itâs result? Uko On 22 May 2014, at 17:03, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > Yeah, > > all the refatory stuff has weird API and SmallLint ones are of the weirdest. The design is bit unfortunate. > You may want to have a look how I did it: > > RBLintRule>>failedMethods, RBLintRule>>failedClasses > > source code's here: > http://www.exept.de/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/stx/goodies/refactoryBrowser/lint/RB… > > Best, Jan > > > On 22/05/14 15:49, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> so Iâm experimenting with rules, and I have one simple question: how do I get a collection of items from some environment which violate some rule? >> >> i know that I can send #runOnEnvironment: to the rule itself and then it will use a checker to run the rule on the environment. But later I end up with the rule itself. I know that I can get all atomic rules from composite rule by sending #leaves, and there is #result method that returns environment. But there is no single way to get items from environment, and all accessors are environment-specific. Am I doing something wrong? Because Iâve spent half of a day to find out how to run a rule and get violations :). >> >> Cheers. >> Uko >> > >

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clarifications with small lint rules

by Yuriy Tymchuk

On 22 May 2014, at 17:03, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > The design is bit unfortunate. ;) Iâll take a look. Thanks Jan.

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clarifications with small lint rules

by Yuriy Tymchuk

On 22 May 2014, at 17:03, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > The design is bit unfortunate. ;) Iâll take a look. Thanks Jan.

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo in Rasbian ?

by Chris Muller

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:50 AM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > I think that Jannik started to clean to code long before tim and he is not > payed for that > so at least we should respect that and do not start to blame him about > redundancy. Hi Stef, I'm talking about redundancy within the default PI configuration. No matter how uber-awesome Phratch is "underneath", Pi-consumer's would find two things on their Pi that appear to be almost the same. Hence my suggestion (before understanding the infeasibility) that jannik try to collaborate rather than reinvent. > And cleaning Scratch is really a MUST because it is full of *&%^&%. > To the point that the people from Scat dropped the maintenance because it > was a NIGHTMARE. > > So can we respect the work of people? I do! I never referred anyone else's work as "full of *&%^&%"...

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Clarifications with small lint rules

by Jan Vrany

Yeah, all the refatory stuff has weird API and SmallLint ones are of the weirdest. The design is bit unfortunate. You may want to have a look how I did it: RBLintRule>>failedMethods, RBLintRule>>failedClasses source code's here: http://www.exept.de/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/stx/goodies/refactoryBrowser/lint/RB… Best, Jan On 22/05/14 15:49, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: > Hi guys, > > so Iâm experimenting with rules, and I have one simple question: how do I get a collection of items from some environment which violate some rule? > > i know that I can send #runOnEnvironment: to the rule itself and then it will use a checker to run the rule on the environment. But later I end up with the rule itself. I know that I can get all atomic rules from composite rule by sending #leaves, and there is #result method that returns environment. But there is no single way to get items from environment, and all accessors are environment-specific. Am I doing something wrong? Because Iâve spent half of a day to find out how to run a rule and get violations :). > > Cheers. > Uko >

May 22, 2014

Clarifications with small lint rules

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Hi guys, so Iâm experimenting with rules, and I have one simple question: how do I get a collection of items from some environment which violate some rule? i know that I can send #runOnEnvironment: to the rule itself and then it will use a checker to run the rule on the environment. But later I end up with the rule itself. I know that I can get all atomic rules from composite rule by sending #leaves, and there is #result method that returns environment. But there is no single way to get items from environment, and all accessors are environment-specific. Am I doing something wrong? Because Iâve spent half of a day to find out how to run a rule and get violations :). Cheers. Uko

May 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Source.squeak.org is down ?

by Torsten Bergmann

May 22, 2014

Source.squeak.org is down ?

by Jean Baptiste Arnaud

Source.squeak.org is down? answer to ping but not reachable Best Regards Jean Baptiste Arnaud jbaptiste.arnaud(a)gmail.com

May 22, 2014