- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving to GitHub

by Benjamin

I had jenkins job doing that :) But sadly, my server is now sleeping in a box since I moved out :) Ben On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:53, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Iâm follower of "new day â new imageâ way :) > > Uko > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:48, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well lately I have been questioning the need for configurations . I am considering doing only the second port of your blog post. Ask github for the latest release of my project , download it, unzip it and point pharo to the unziped directory. Then pharo can periodocally keep probing github to see if there is a new release and prompt the user for an update. All that with a single click from the user or even automagically. But I have to figure out how to do that with Pharo first :) >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> You donât have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to do it http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo…) on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone wantâs to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) >> >> Cheers. >> Uko >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. >>> >>> Uko >>> >>> >>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>>> >>>> Uko >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving to GitHub

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Iâm follower of "new day â new imageâ way :) Uko On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:48, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Well lately I have been questioning the need for configurations . I am considering doing only the second port of your blog post. Ask github for the latest release of my project , download it, unzip it and point pharo to the unziped directory. Then pharo can periodocally keep probing github to see if there is a new release and prompt the user for an update. All that with a single click from the user or even automagically. But I have to figure out how to do that with Pharo first :) > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > You donât have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to do it http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo…) on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone wantâs to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) > > Cheers. > Uko > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. >> >> Uko >> >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>> >>> Uko >>> >> >> > >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Moving to GitHub

by kilon alios

Well lately I have been questioning the need for configurations . I am considering doing only the second port of your blog post. Ask github for the latest release of my project , download it, unzip it and point pharo to the unziped directory. Then pharo can periodocally keep probing github to see if there is a new release and prompt the user for an update. All that with a single click from the user or even automagically. But I have to figure out how to do that with Pharo first :) On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > You donât have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to do > it > http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo…) > on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone > wantâs to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, > Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) > > Cheers. > Uko > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more > active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me > so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the > latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> > wrote: > >> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have >> configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs >> a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my >> configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are >> configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here >> reliability is much more important then other features. >> >> Uko >> >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my >>> SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>> >>> Uko >>> >> >> >> > >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:21, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:16, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:09, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> something is going bad with smalltalkhub, it is working in *really* slow motion, with a lot of packet loss, etc. >> >> I think it just misses Nico badly :). > > :) > >> >>> Iâm trying to figure out what is happening, but not sure how much time it will take. >>> Iâm sorry for the inconveniences :P >> >> Itâs ok (not really ok, but I was worried that everything is working fine, just my projects disappeared). > > in the mean time, I restored your projects (but is still working slow without any obvious reason) Thank you! > > Esteban > >> >> Good luck! >> Uko >> >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:03, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. >>>> >>>> Uko >>>> >>>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>>>> >>>>> Uko >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by Esteban Lorenzano

On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. yeah, in the medium term, this is going to be the best path. We are working on provide better tools for using git and we feel this is the best path for pharo, in the no so far future :) (and honestly, I prefer to spend my time maintaining pharo and not smalltalkhub :P) Esteban > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. > > Uko > > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >> >> Uko >> > >

Aug. 4, 2014

Moving to GitHub

by Yuriy Tymchuk

You donât have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to do it http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo…) on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone wantâs to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) Cheers. Uko On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. > > Uko > > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >> >> Uko >> > >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by Esteban Lorenzano

On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:16, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:09, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> something is going bad with smalltalkhub, it is working in *really* slow motion, with a lot of packet loss, etc. > > I think it just misses Nico badly :). :) > >> Iâm trying to figure out what is happening, but not sure how much time it will take. >> Iâm sorry for the inconveniences :P > > Itâs ok (not really ok, but I was worried that everything is working fine, just my projects disappeared). in the mean time, I restored your projects (but is still working slow without any obvious reason) Esteban > > Good luck! > Uko > >> >> Esteban >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:03, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. >>> >>> Uko >>> >>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>>> >>>> Uko >>>> >>> >> >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by kilon alios

yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have > configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs > a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my > configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are > configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here > reliability is much more important then other features. > > Uko > > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my >> SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >> >> Uko >> > > >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by Yuriy Tymchuk

On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:09, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > something is going bad with smalltalkhub, it is working in *really* slow motion, with a lot of packet loss, etc. I think it just misses Nico badly :). > Iâm trying to figure out what is happening, but not sure how much time it will take. > Iâm sorry for the inconveniences :P Itâs ok (not really ok, but I was worried that everything is working fine, just my projects disappeared). Good luck! Uko > > Esteban > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:03, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > >> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. >> >> Uko >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>> >>> Uko >>> >> >

Aug. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] No projects on StHub?

by Esteban Lorenzano

something is going bad with smalltalkhub, it is working in *really* slow motion, with a lot of packet loss, etc. Iâm trying to figure out what is happening, but not sure how much time it will take. Iâm sorry for the inconveniences :P Esteban On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:03, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway itâs a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my configurations? Because thatâs the only thing I version with monticello are configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here reliability is much more important then other features. > > Uko > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >> >> Uko >> >

Aug. 4, 2014