- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Draw PolygonMorph with athens

by Nicolai Hess

for issue 13791 I uploaded a slice to make the PolygonMorph drawing work on an AthensCanvas. The results look great, although there is a small difference between athens and morphics curve polygon drawing. The difference is more visible for open curved polygons. I don't know why, I don't think we really need this :) and I would like to move on to work on some more important Morphs :) nicolai

Aug. 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pull up a method or Push up a method?

by Tim Mackinnon

My recollection is that it got changed (in industry) because it made more sense contextually, that when looking at a particular method you would push it up the hierarchy vs. pull (I think I also recall that in the original RFB, you had to be on the superclass and then choose pull up - and it showed you potential methods you could pull? I might be mistaken - but I recall that it was quite awkward). The downside of the current terminology - is that pushing should also find similar peer methods (in other equivalent subclasses) and push them up as well. That is less obvious - than in the âpullâ terminology - as being at the top you can see all the equivalents and more obviously pull them all together. However, I think the current words are better - and it seems to be what has stuck now. Tim p.s. We really should start looking at introducing keystrokes for many of these refactorings in Pharo - definitely the extract and rename variants should be doable from the keyboard in the method pane. When you see our colleagues using IntelliJ (and even Eclipse) - its so much faster. On 12 Aug 2014, at 02:00, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > According to the book Refactoring[1] you pull up a method but if you look at > the refactoring options in a method, you'll see push up instead of pull up. See attached image. > > Is that a bug or a deliberate decision? > > Thanks > > > [1] Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code > Martin Fowler > Kent Beck > John Brant > William Opdyke > Don Roberts > Publisher: Addison Wesley > > -- > Bernardo E.C. > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. > <a MenuMorph(931135488).jpeg>

Aug. 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] pillar parser with tokens?

by Damien Cassou

Hi Doru, On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > The Pillar parser does not record the token from the original text. Are > there any plans to change this part :)? I don't have much time to improve the Pillar parser. Additionally, what you ask for is a total rewrite of the parser as it is based on lines and characters and not on tokens. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

Aug. 12, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40166 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Aug. 12, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 93bd2f: 40166

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 93bd2f9d0b4f9321c71e76ffec4c4edce553a943 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/93bd2f9d0b4f9321c71e76ff… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2014-08-12 (Tue, 12 Aug 2014) Changed paths: R Collections-Support.package/ValueLink.class/instance/as yet unclassified/=.st A Collections-Support.package/ValueLink.class/instance/comparing/=.st A Collections-Support.package/ValueLink.class/instance/comparing/hash.st R Collections-Support.package/ValueLink.class/instance/nil/hash.st M OpalCompiler-Core.package/extension/Object/instance/mustBeBooleanInMagic_.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script166.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40166.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st M Tool-Browser-Old.package/CodeHolder.class/definition.st M Tool-Changes.package/ChangeList.class/class/settings/ChangeListSettingsOn_.st R Tool-Changes.package/ChangeList.class/class/settings/diffsInChangeList.st R Tool-Changes.package/ChangeList.class/class/settings/diffsInChangeList_.st M Tool-Changes.package/ChangeList.class/instance/initialization/initialize.st Log Message: ----------- 40166 13817 remove setting for showing diffs in change list https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13817 13807 nil protocol and unclassified in ValueLink https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13807 13805 mustBeBooleanMagicIn: can crash the vm https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13805 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40166.zip

Aug. 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] blogging about Pharo stuff? send me your link!

by Noury Bouraqadi

Hi Esteban, There is our the blog of the team at Ecole des Mines http://car.mines-douai.fr On 05 Aug 2014, at 15:06, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I know, there are several concentrator pages like http://planet.smalltalk.org, etc. > but I want to put your blog here: > > http://pharo.org/blogs > > So, please send me (in private, to not pollute this list) your Pharo related blog :) > > Esteban

Aug. 12, 2014

Our vision: Self-Adaptive IDEs

by Roberto Minelli

Hi guys, I uploaded a web page to explain Self-Adaptive IDEs, the vision I will develop for my Ph.D http://www.inf.usi.ch/phd/minelli/self-adaptive-ides/index.html. Please take a minute to look at it and tell me your opinion! At the moment we are conducting an experiment with my interaction profiler (DFlow). It would be great if you could participate! This will cost you little effort but help me to gather an understanding of development practices and interactions. This is the ground for improving our Pharo IDE! Cheers and thanks in advance, Roberto

Aug. 12, 2014

About STON

by stepharo

sven I was wondering if we could get the following in STON STON acceptNonPresentClasses. STON readFrom: 'Blblbl {#foo : 3} would create a dictionary with class name -> #Blblbl Now if the class is loaded we would get a Blblbl object Christophe has some other ideas such STON nilOutEmptyCollections. to avoid to save #() and other Stef

Aug. 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pull up a method or Push up a method?

by stepharo

For me pull means that you move from a subclass to a class while push is from a class to its superclass. Now it depends on it is implemented. Note that these refactorings were implemented long before the book (excellent BTW - I enjoyed reviewing it and martin told me that our reviews were excellent and forcing him to improve it). Stef On 12/8/14 03:00, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: > Hi all, > According to the book Refactoring[1] you pull up a method but if you > look at > the refactoring options in a method, you'll see push up instead of > pull up. See attached image. > > Is that a bug or a deliberate decision? > > Thanks > > > [1] Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code > Martin Fowler > Kent Beck > John Brant > William Opdyke > Don Roberts > Publisher: Addison Wesley > > -- > Bernardo E.C. > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.

Aug. 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Xtreams build failing on 4.0

by Max Leske

Sven, maybe get the output of otool -l /path/to/lib and compare the paths to linked libraries to the ones found in the plugin of the failing job. There might be a problem with the location of certain libraries. Or notâ¦ :) Cheers, Max On 11.08.2014, at 15:29, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 15:21, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I suspect ContextPart>>#reading, that is a class extension from Xtreams in ContextPart to be the reason. >> >> It should now be an extension of Context and not ContextPart. > > Yes, that is something we should fix, I saw that while loading the code in a fresh 4.0 > > However, that still does not explain why the failing tests pass on my Mac. Weird. > >> 2014-08-11 14:35 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: >> It seems that the Xtreams build has been failing since june 30th for 4.0 and not 3.0: >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Xtreams/ >> >> From the changes to 4.0 around that period I can't immediately see something obvious: >> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commits/4.0?page=4 >> >> I just tried loading Xtreams in on my machine and all tests succeed. >> >> All errors on Jenkins seem to be related to primitives not being found in libCrypto: >> >> Error Message >> >> External module not found >> >> Stacktrace >> >> XTLibCryptoHash(Object)>>error: >> XTLibCryptoHash(Object)>>externalCallFailed >> XTLibCryptoHash>>EVP_MD_CTX_init: >> XTLibCryptoHash>>initialize >> XTHash class>>new >> XTHashTest>>testMD5 >> XTHashTest(TestCase)>>performTest >> >> So, is it possible there was a change in the VM ? >> >> The Xtreams source code itself has not been changed for months. >> >> Sven >> >> >> > >

Aug. 12, 2014