- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] BlockClosure source code

by Max Leske

Can you provide a simple test to execute? > On 08.10.2014, at 16:46, Jan KurÅ¡ <kurs(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to extract a source code from a block closure and I found something strange: > > [ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] ifTrue: [ ] ] . > [ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] whileTrue:[ ] ]. > > Print of the first line returns: > '[ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] ifTrue: [ ] ]' > > Print of the second line returns: > '[ ctx atEnd ]' > > And honestly, I have no idea why. This behaviour was observed in Pharo3 and Pharo4. > > Is there a way how to get a consistent result, i.e. '[ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] whileTrue:[ ] ]' for a second line? > > Thank you in advance! > Jan

Oct. 8, 2014

Missing hierarchy picture

by Yuriy Tymchuk

You know what is missing on this picture? Traits :) Cheers! Uko

Oct. 8, 2014

BlockClosure source code

by Jan KurÅ¡

Hi, I need to extract a source code from a block closure and I found something strange: [ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] ifTrue: [ ] ] . [ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] whileTrue:[ ] ]. Print of the first line returns: '[ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] ifTrue: [ ] ]' Print of the second line returns: '[ ctx atEnd ]' And honestly, I have no idea why. This behaviour was observed in Pharo3 and Pharo4. Is there a way how to get a consistent result, i.e. '[ :ctx | [ ctx atEnd ] whileTrue:[ ] ]' for a second line? Thank you in advance! Jan

Oct. 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] showPackages: ?

by stepharo

Thanks I found the solution. On 8/10/14 15:04, stepharo wrote: > Hi > > I'm updating the dependency analyzer and since the API of Nautilus UI > changed I have a DNU with showPackages: > > > nautilusUI > showPackages: nautilus switchClassesAndPackages not; > giveFocusToMethod > > any ideas about what is the new message? > > Stef > >

Oct. 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] extract data from .mcz

by Alexandre Bergel

Ok, thanks! Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Oct 8, 2014, at 3:25 AM, jannik laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > In 2011, I did an extractor for Monticello and Metacello configuration. It was for another model than Moose. > I reused and improve your extractor. It can help you: > > MCHttpRepository > location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/VPraxisExporter' > user: 'jm' > password: '' > > Cheers, > Jannik > > 2014-10-07 23:21 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>: > Thanks! It helps! > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > On Oct 6, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: >> Thanks Eliot. I know this. I meant code snippet to programmatically, within Pharo, do some queries. >> >> Such as? >> >> Some times ago I worked on a MCZ importer in Moose. I will have a look at it. >> >> The key is to ask a repository for the versions it has, get one or more versions, and create snapshots from these versions: >> >> >> e.g. SpurBootstrapMonticelloPackagePatcher in VMMaker.oscog creates patched versions of packages. To create a repository, e.g. >> >> MCRepositoryGroup default repositories >> detect: [:r| r description = url] >> ifNone: [MCHttpRepository >> location: url >> user: 'squeak' >> password: 'squeak'] >> >> but there's also the package cache: >> >> MCCacheRepository default >> >> You can ask them what versions they have: >> >> repository versionNamesForPackageNamed: package name >> >> You can create these versions, and store them: >> >> (trunk possiblyNewerVersionsOfAnyOf: latestUnbranched) do: >> [:unpatched| >> dest storeVersion: (trunk versionNamed: unpatched)] >> >> And you can create "snapshots" of these versions which contain all the definitions: >> >> version: version withPatches: patches for: package >> | snapshot ancestry | >> snapshot := MCPatcher >> apply: (self patchForPackage: package withPatches: patches snapshot: version snapshot) >> to: version snapshot. >> ancestry := MCWorkingAncestry new addAncestor: version info. >> ^MCVersion >> package: version package >> info: (ancestry >> infoWithName: (self spurBranchNameForInfo: version info package: package) >> message: version info name, >> ' patched for Spur by ', >> (CCodeGenerator shortMonticelloDescriptionForClass: self class), >> '\\' withCRs, >> version info message) >> snapshot: snapshot >> dependencies: {} "punt on computing dependencies; there are't any so far" >> >> >> HTH >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> On Oct 6, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alexandre, >>> >>> .mcz's are just zip files. The attached extracts the .st file as the package name with a .st extension instead of a .mcz extension. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Anyone has some code snippet to extract data from .mcz file ? >>> Getting all the classes, doing some queries... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> best, >>> Eliot >>> <mzex> >> -- >> best, >> Eliot > > > > > -- > ~~Jannik Laval~~ > Ãcole des Mines de Douai > Enseignant-chercheur > http://www.jannik-laval.eu > http://www.phratch.com > http://www.approchealpes.info > http://car.mines-douai.fr/ >

Oct. 8, 2014

Analyzing database

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi! I am wondering if any of you is using Roassal and/or Moose to analyze data bases? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Oct. 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] showPackages: ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

it did not had sense so is removed :) showPackages: true = showHierarchy: false. So now we just have one message. Esteban > On 08 Oct 2014, at 15:04, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > I'm updating the dependency analyzer and since the API of Nautilus UI changed I have a DNU with showPackages: > > > nautilusUI > showPackages: nautilus switchClassesAndPackages not; > giveFocusToMethod > > any ideas about what is the new message? > > Stef >

Oct. 8, 2014

showPackages: ?

by stepharo

Hi I'm updating the dependency analyzer and since the API of Nautilus UI changed I have a DNU with showPackages: nautilusUI showPackages: nautilus switchClassesAndPackages not; giveFocusToMethod any ideas about what is the new message? Stef

Oct. 8, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

by Alexandre Bergel

+1 Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:22 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Yes, essentially, the State view shows you the tree of objects like you had in the explorer. But, I like State better than Structure :) > > But, I also like Raw because it goes in comparison with the rest of the presentations of that object: this is the raw presentation, but the others are more refined and specific :). > > Doru > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 'Structure' is large :P > > > On 04 Oct 2014, at 08:58, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > > Raw is good, but what about 'Structure' ? > > AFAIU, it is the State/Structure that is used for the tree view, right ? > > > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 22:50, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > > >> Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). > >> > >> Anyone against "Raw"? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Doru > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> > >>> I'll make a new version to integrate. > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Andrei > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >>> Done! > >>> > >>> Doru > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the Moose team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? > >>> > >>> Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits behind. > >>> > >>>> Doru > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > >>>> I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: > >>>> > >>>> === > >>>> Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 > >>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe > >>>> Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm > >>>> UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83 > >>>> Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53 > >>>> > >>>> Customized GT-Inspector for Integer, Float and Character > >>>> === > >>>> > >>>> MCZ attached: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I made it so that 'State' shows slots only (if any) and takes precedence. > >>>> > >>>> I added an 'Integer' tab to Integer with decimal, hex, octal, binary and optional character aspects. > >>>> > >>>> I added a 'Float' tab to Float with (binary, base 2) significant and exponent (self = significant * (2 ** exponent)) [the old sign field was not needed since significant is signed already), while making the 'State' show the 2 indexed slots (which is more correct IMHO). > >>>> > >>>> I added a 'Character' tab with self, codepoint and unicode aspects. > >>>> > >>>> Obviously this has to be iterated upon. I am already very happy that I could figure out how to do this. Much more from the old Eye inspectors will follow. > >>>> > >>>> Sven > >>>> > >>>> PS1: Implementing this, I sense that we might need an option so that a field can show some label for its value, while clicking further on it would continue on something else (obviously related), differently field by field. > >>>> > >>>> PS2: Is is necessary/useful for the States fields in #gtInspectorVariableValuePairs to be a Set instead of something that preserves the order ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>> > >>>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>> > >>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> www.tudorgirba.com > >> > >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"

Oct. 8, 2014

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/40291 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Oct. 8, 2014