- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] playground history

by Marcus Denker

> On 07 Nov 2014, at 15:04, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > In the latest Pharo4 (at least), the history of the text written in the Playground has gone! > There is a nice publish icon but no way to get the history. > Do I miss something or was it really removed? The history is very useful and I would like to get it back. > it appears when you open a new Playground. I added an issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14414/Playground-history-only-shown-after… <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14414/Playground-history-only-shown-after…> Marcus

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] edit values in GTInspector

by Marcus Denker

> On 07 Nov 2014, at 16:37, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > I already asked this too, so +1 - this is needed. > Yes, editing state and inspectors need to be updated so you see live how value are changing even when they are changed from somewhere else. >> On 07 Nov 2014, at 16:29, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is it planned to add the possibility to edit instances variables of an object directly from the inspector. I mean without evaluating code, just by clicking on the value and update it? >> >> Regards, >> Christophe. > >

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] edit values in GTInspector

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

I already asked this too, so +1 - this is needed. > On 07 Nov 2014, at 16:29, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it planned to add the possibility to edit instances variables of an object directly from the inspector. I mean without evaluating code, just by clicking on the value and update it? > > Regards, > Christophe.

Nov. 7, 2014

edit values in GTInspector

by Christophe Demarey

Hi, Is it planned to add the possibility to edit instances variables of an object directly from the inspector. I mean without evaluating code, just by clicking on the value and update it? Regards, Christophe.

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] playground history

by Alexandre Bergel

FYI: Andrei is away from his computer for a few days. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > In the latest Pharo4 (at least), the history of the text written in the Playground has gone! > There is a nice publish icon but no way to get the history. > Do I miss something or was it really removed? The history is very useful and I would like to get it back. > > Thanks, > Christophe.

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric?

by Alain Plantec

Hi Esteban, can you commit your changes in the Rubric Smalltalkhub repository ? I've already added you as a contributor. Cheers Alain > On 7 nov. 2014, at 14:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually, Iâm (finally) about to integrate it (an alpha version). > it will be in the image next week :P > > Esteban > >> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:32, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: >> >> I think we should submit TxModel to the vaporware awards 2014 :) >> >> Norbert >> >>> Am 07.11.2014 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>> I would say yes. >>> we would like to have rubric everywhere we need a real editor :) >>> (while waiting for the new TxModel, this is the âless pain pathâ, IMO) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>>> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:07, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Is it worth to integrate Rubric into Nautilus? Or is there any reason not to do it? >>>> >>>> Thank you a lot! >>>> Juraj >>> >>> >> >> > >

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric?

by Norbert Hartl

Hurrayy!!!! Good news! Thanks! Norbert > Am 07.11.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > > Actually, Iâm (finally) about to integrate it (an alpha version). > it will be in the image next week :P > > Esteban > >> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:32, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: >> >> I think we should submit TxModel to the vaporware awards 2014 :) >> >> Norbert >> >>> Am 07.11.2014 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>> I would say yes. >>> we would like to have rubric everywhere we need a real editor :) >>> (while waiting for the new TxModel, this is the âless pain pathâ, IMO) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>>> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:07, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Is it worth to integrate Rubric into Nautilus? Or is there any reason not to do it? >>>> >>>> Thank you a lot! >>>> Juraj >>> >>> >> >> > >

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric?

by Alain Plantec

:)) > On 7 nov. 2014, at 14:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually, Iâm (finally) about to integrate it (an alpha version). > it will be in the image next week :P > > Esteban > >> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:32, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: >> >> I think we should submit TxModel to the vaporware awards 2014 :) >> >> Norbert >> >>> Am 07.11.2014 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>> I would say yes. >>> we would like to have rubric everywhere we need a real editor :) >>> (while waiting for the new TxModel, this is the âless pain pathâ, IMO) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>>> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:07, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Is it worth to integrate Rubric into Nautilus? Or is there any reason not to do it? >>>> >>>> Thank you a lot! >>>> Juraj >>> >>> >> >> > >

Nov. 7, 2014

playground history

by Christophe Demarey

In the latest Pharo4 (at least), the history of the text written in the Playground has gone! There is a nice publish icon but no way to get the history. Do I miss something or was it really removed? The history is very useful and I would like to get it back. Thanks, Christophe.

Nov. 7, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric?

by Torsten Bergmann

I agree with Alain here. From what I see Igor invested a lot into this and I think it is just a problem of time once again to make it complete and usable. The demos and code in the repo are really promising! Or did I miss something? To answer the original question it would be interesting: 1. why is Rubric better than the old model 2. what are the main differences between the old, Rubric and the new (not only features but also regarding integration) 3. what is the current state of TxText, what is missing 4. how could the community help Thanks T. > Gesendet: Freitag, 07. November 2014 um 14:47 Uhr > Von: "Alain Plantec" <alain.plantec(a)yahoo.com> > An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org> > Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric? > > > > On 7 nov. 2014, at 14:32, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: > > > > I think we should submit TxModel to the vaporware awards 2014 :) > > Hi Norbert, > I really don't think so. Have a look. > TxText is a real perl, I can't believe it will not be released. > Cheers > Alain > > > > > Norbert > > > >> Am 07.11.2014 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > >> > >> I would say yes. > >> we would like to have rubric everywhere we need a real editor :) > >> (while waiting for the new TxModel, this is the âless pain pathâ, IMO) > >> > >> Esteban > >> > >>> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:07, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Is it worth to integrate Rubric into Nautilus? Or is there any reason not to do it? > >>> > >>> Thank you a lot! > >>> Juraj > >> > >> > > > > > > >

Nov. 7, 2014