- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to tell Pharo 3.0 from 4.0

by Jan Vrany

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 10:54 +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > SystemVersion current Great, thanks! Jan

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to tell Pharo 3.0 from 4.0

by kilon alios

"SystemVersion current" or Smalltalk image version.

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to tell Pharo 3.0 from 4.0

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

SystemVersion current > On 04 Dec 2014, at 10:46, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Go to the World menu / System / About > > Cheers, > Doru > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > how do I tell from within a running image whether > I'm running on Pharo 3.0 or 4.0 image? Thanks! > > Jan > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo+Git cons?

by kilon alios

"Well, itâs not complete, far fromit actually. Git is hugeâ¦ (also, see my response to Thierry)" yes that sound more logical . "Yes, but the tools should use libgit2 bindings, not the Smalltalk implementation." that sounds even more logical too. I am asking those questions because at the moment I thought I was missing something. I read people discussing implementing git in Pharo like its a one man project while my understanding is that git is huge and probably even bigger than pharo itself and that the problems is trying to solve are far more complex than the existing version control system of Pharo. But I am far from expert on this. using libgit2 sounds to me like a logical evolution for Pharo.

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to tell Pharo 3.0 from 4.0

by Tudor Girba

Go to the World menu / System / About Cheers, Doru On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > how do I tell from within a running image whether > I'm running on Pharo 3.0 or 4.0 image? Thanks! > > Jan > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] fixing 'format on display' and 'format on accept'

by Otto Behrens

Hi, We just upgraded to Pharo 3 (after using pharo 1.4 for a looong time). I'm a bit new to some things, so pardon my ignorance. We're so used to auto formatting the code, it drives us nuts not to have it. I eventually figured out that the Pharo30 inbox is here: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30Inbox/main. Is a slice is something I can "patch in"? How do I get hold of this? Thanks a lot Otto On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Slice is in the Pharo30Inbox > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14387/ressurrect-format-on-accept-and-for… > > It uses the settings browser as described below and auto-formats methods (on > display or accept or both) in Nautilus and the senders/implementors browser. > > > > > Paul DeBruicker wrote >> Hi - >> >> I'm going to get 'format on display' and 'format on accept' working in >> Nautilus. In Pharo 3 in the settings browser under 'code browsing' there >> is a 'pretty print' check box. As far as I can tell it doesn't affect >> code displaying at all in Nautilus. >> >> >> Is it OK to repurpose that checkbox as a control for 'format on display' >> and to also add a check box right there for 'format on accept' ? If not >> what would be better? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Paul > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/fixing-format-on-display-and-format-on-accept-tp47883… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Dec. 4, 2014

Meaning of VirtualMachine>>incrementalGCCount

by Jan Vrany

Hi there, what's exact meaning of VirtualMachine>>incrementalGCCount? Comment says: "Answer the total number of incremental GCs since startup (read-only)." But what exactly is called 'incremental CG' in context of PharoVM? Again, thanks for any clarification :-) Jan

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo+Git cons?

by Max Leske

> On 04.12.2014, at 10:09, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > "Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt..." > > is ? really ? wow I am impressed I thought reimplementing git in smalltalk would be a huge effort. Pharo surprises me once more :) Well, itâs not complete, far fromit actually. Git is hugeâ¦ (also, see my response to Thierry) > > so the problem now is to build the tools on top of it to utilize git ? Yes, but the tools should use libgit2 bindings, not the Smalltalk implementation. > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com <mailto:maxleske@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On 04.12.2014, at 09:47, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > What are the benefits that justify the effort to reimplementing git in smalltalk ? > > > > Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt... > > >

Dec. 4, 2014

How to tell Pharo 3.0 from 4.0

by Jan Vrany

Hi, how do I tell from within a running image whether I'm running on Pharo 3.0 or 4.0 image? Thanks! Jan

Dec. 4, 2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo+Git cons?

by kilon alios

"Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt..." is ? really ? wow I am impressed I thought reimplementing git in smalltalk would be a huge effort. Pharo surprises me once more :) so the problem now is to build the tools on top of it to utilize git ? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 04.12.2014, at 09:47, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > What are the benefits that justify the effort to reimplementing git in > smalltalk ? > > > > Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is > FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt... > > >

Dec. 4, 2014