- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 5a4f51: 40607

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 5a4f510aa547a2f37e3eb668fb2c9972037db9b5 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/5a4f510aa547a2f37e3eb668… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2015-04-14 (Tue, 14 Apr 2015) Changed paths: M Athens-Examples.package/VGTigerDemo.class/class/run/runDemo.st M ConfigurationOfAthens.package/ConfigurationOfAthens.class/instance/symbolic versions/stable_.st A ConfigurationOfAthens.package/ConfigurationOfAthens.class/instance/versions/version32_.st A Files.package/PharoSourcesCondenser.class/instance/as yet unclassified/writeClassComment_.st R ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script606.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script607.st R ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40606.st A ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update40607.st M ScriptLoader40.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st Log Message: ----------- 40607 15229 Athens uses wrong <example> pragma https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15229 15336 Writing a new .souces brakes class comments https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336 http://files.pharo.org/image/40/40607.zip

April 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

by Dale Henrichs

On 4/13/15 7:35 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Dale Henrichs-3 wrote >> I can help you figure out the reqs for any other plugins, since I still >> have >> not completely forgotten the magic incantations:) > Any info is greatly appreciated! I noticed in your script, you did not "sudo > dpkg --add-architecture i386" which seemed during my investigations to be > required. > Well apparently "required" is too strong of a word:) I can only say that I've tested the scripts against 12.04 and 14.04 and Pharo 3.0 (and Pharo1.1 with a different vm) and things run fine ... I am not an expert (Mariano helped alot) and had to learn because the pharo launcher package stopped working. The basic trick is to run `ldd` against the plugin/.so files in the vm directory and IIRC, you get a "not found" message for the missing libraries and I just tacked :i386 onto library name for `apt-get`... When I get into the office tomorrow, I'll try running `ldd` on my 12.04 and 14.04 virtual machines and see if there's anything else that might be missing ... Dale

April 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

by Sean P. DeNigris

Dale Henrichs-3 wrote > I can help you figure out the reqs for any other plugins, since I still > have > not completely forgotten the magic incantations:) Any info is greatly appreciated! I noticed in your script, you did not "sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386" which seemed during my investigations to be required. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Urgent-Clean-up-Download-Instructions-before-4-0-Rele… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

by Dale Henrichs

Sean, I've just gone through a similar process (when the pharo launcher package stopped working on ubunut12.04). I created a script[1] for installing the prereqs for both ubuntu12.04 and ubuntu14.04, based on the "vmLatest" vm ... but I did find that libgl1-mesa-dev:i386 and libxcb-dri2-0:i386 are needed for X11 on both platforms ... sudo apt-get -y install libgl1-mesa-dev:i386 sudo apt-get -y install libxcb-dri2-0:i386 I also picked up that libfreetype6:i386 was needed for freetype support ... some of the other libraries are needed for only for GemStone/S and I have a bonus set of libraries that are needed for Pharo 1.1 and it's old vm to run (in the GemTools section) ... I really only worried about the fonts, ssl and x11 plugins, but I can help you figure out the reqs for any other plugins, since I still have not completely forgotten the magic incantations:) Dale [1] https://github.com/GsDevKit/gsDevKitHome/blob/dev/bin/osPrereqs On 4/13/15 3:43 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> I tried installing on Ubuntu and Debian from the perspective of a new user >> based on the instructions at http://pharo.org/download and they are a >> shambles! > One huge pain point is installing 32-bit libraries. This seems to be getting > harder and harder as time goes on. > > Old School > ====== > sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 > sudo apt-get update > sudo apt-get install ia32-libs > > But many newer distros no longer support the ia32-libs package, so... > > Ubuntu > ===== > > Ubuntu 12.04: use old-school method above > > But in 14.04 there is apparently no way to do this. You can get close with > "sudo aptitude install lib32z1 lib32ncurses5 lib32bz2-1.0" and "sudo > aptitude install libx11-6:i386", but the next recommended step of "sudo > aptitude install libgl1-mesa-glx:i386" would not work for me and google > didn't seem to provide any alternatives. The only workaround I found was to > install pharo-vm-core via the ppa first, and then ZeroConf and zipped > downloads work. > > Debian wheezy (7.8) > ============= > # It's possible, but definitely not one-click. It requires the 32-bit libs > and the special libc < 2.15 VM > # Use old school method above and then... > wget -O- http://swing.fit.cvut.cz/download/pharo/vm-swing | bash > > Summary > ====== > The matrix of 32-bit * libc * [ zip | package management | ZeroConf ] makes > things very frustrating and confusing. Hopefully, we will soon be 64-bit, > but in the mean time, creating zips from the old-lib-c (aka swing) VM would > smooth out one axis and make explaining things a bit easier. It would be > great > > Anyway, I spent most of the day and almost gave up before finally getting > clear. I'll be away from the computer until Wednesday. If no one is able to > create old-lib-c zips by then, I'll have another look. > Issue 15337: Old libC Zip > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15337 > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Urgent-Clean-up-Download-Instructions-before-4-0-Rele… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Urgent]: Clean up Download Instructions before 4.0 Release

by Sean P. DeNigris

Sean P. DeNigris wrote > I tried installing on Ubuntu and Debian from the perspective of a new user > based on the instructions at http://pharo.org/download and they are a > shambles! One huge pain point is installing 32-bit libraries. This seems to be getting harder and harder as time goes on. Old School ====== sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install ia32-libs But many newer distros no longer support the ia32-libs package, so... Ubuntu ===== Ubuntu 12.04: use old-school method above But in 14.04 there is apparently no way to do this. You can get close with "sudo aptitude install lib32z1 lib32ncurses5 lib32bz2-1.0" and "sudo aptitude install libx11-6:i386", but the next recommended step of "sudo aptitude install libgl1-mesa-glx:i386" would not work for me and google didn't seem to provide any alternatives. The only workaround I found was to install pharo-vm-core via the ppa first, and then ZeroConf and zipped downloads work. Debian wheezy (7.8) ============= # It's possible, but definitely not one-click. It requires the 32-bit libs and the special libc < 2.15 VM # Use old school method above and then... wget -O- http://swing.fit.cvut.cz/download/pharo/vm-swing | bash Summary ====== The matrix of 32-bit * libc * [ zip | package management | ZeroConf ] makes things very frustrating and confusing. Hopefully, we will soon be 64-bit, but in the mean time, creating zips from the old-lib-c (aka swing) VM would smooth out one axis and make explaining things a bit easier. It would be great Anyway, I spent most of the day and almost gave up before finally getting clear. I'll be away from the computer until Wednesday. If no one is able to create old-lib-c zips by then, I'll have another look. Issue 15337: Old libC Zip https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15337 ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Urgent-Clean-up-Download-Instructions-before-4-0-Rele… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Sean P. DeNigris

NorbertHartl wrote > Which ppa you are talking about Again, I didn't realize there were multiple packages. I thought the ppa /always/ installed the Launcher. Disregard. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-Pharo-Launcher-Ready-tp4819384p4819419.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Dale Henrichs

By "download" ... I am referring to the zero conf downloads ... if zero conf downloads are not going to be impacted (again), then "never mind":) Dale On 4/13/15 1:28 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > > > On 4/13/15 10:01 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> IIUC we are planning on making Pharo Launcher the default download. > Not sure whether this is the right thread or not... > > Keep in mind that the last time I tried to use the Pharo Launcher (a > couple of months ago) on ubunutu12.04 the Ubuntu packaged failed to be > found and I had to abandon my use of Pharo Launcher since Ubuntu12.04 > is still in common use ... my desktop at work, travis-ci (the big > problem for me) and elsewhere ... currently the downloads (outside of > those that depend upon the Ubuntu package) work just fine on > ubuntu12.04 (and of course Pharo runs just fine on ubuntu12.04), but > if the "default download" starts using the Pharo Launcher then those > of working on ubuntu12.04 will be forced to find alternate solutions > to downloading Pharo ... > > If "default download" is scoped to the be only the newer versions of > Pharo, like 4.0 or 5.0, then it would be fair to exclude Ubuntu12.04 > from the very convenient download scripts ... otherwise I'd like to > know right now so I can take defensive actions...like rewriting all of > my download scripts to use a safe mechanism based on ftp:) > > I'm going to have to touch those scripts anyway, because the vmLatest > url just stopped working one day last week, but I'd really not like to > have to rewrite my pharo download scripts every 2 months:), so if > there are plans to summarily drop download support for Ubuntu12.04 in > the near future, then I'd rather know about that before I touch my > scripts:) > > Dale

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PharoV40.sources for 40606

by Nicolas Cellier

2015-04-13 17:38 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > Yes, that is bad. > > Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so > that others can try to debug this situation ? > > > I did > > PharoSourcesCondenser condenseNewSources > > and the after the class comment of LargePositiveInteger is empty, the > class comment of others are wrong. > (e.g. LargeNegativeInteger is > > "s > ^ separatorsâ > > > > The method sources seem to be ok: I can recompile everything with no > problem. > (that I tested already some weeks ago not to run into the famous âcondense > sources does not workâ issue > a day before the releaseâ¦ of course, it was not enough). > > > I think we fixed itâ¦ slice incoming. > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-c… > > Marcus > > Very good idea to use brakes when changes are coming too fast ;)

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Norbert Hartl

> Am 13.04.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com>: > > Marcus Denker-4 wrote >> Yes, but not for Pharo4. > > Then I think for now we should change the ppa to install an image+VM like > the rest. > Which ppa you are talking about. Please just don't touch the pharo-vm-core package :) Norbert

April 13, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] Is Pharo Launcher Ready?

by Dale Henrichs

On 4/13/15 10:01 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > IIUC we are planning on making Pharo Launcher the default download. Not sure whether this is the right thread or not... Keep in mind that the last time I tried to use the Pharo Launcher (a couple of months ago) on ubunutu12.04 the Ubuntu packaged failed to be found and I had to abandon my use of Pharo Launcher since Ubuntu12.04 is still in common use ... my desktop at work, travis-ci (the big problem for me) and elsewhere ... currently the downloads (outside of those that depend upon the Ubuntu package) work just fine on ubuntu12.04 (and of course Pharo runs just fine on ubuntu12.04), but if the "default download" starts using the Pharo Launcher then those of working on ubuntu12.04 will be forced to find alternate solutions to downloading Pharo ... If "default download" is scoped to the be only the newer versions of Pharo, like 4.0 or 5.0, then it would be fair to exclude Ubuntu12.04 from the very convenient download scripts ... otherwise I'd like to know right now so I can take defensive actions...like rewriting all of my download scripts to use a safe mechanism based on ftp:) I'm going to have to touch those scripts anyway, because the vmLatest url just stopped working one day last week, but I'd really not like to have to rewrite my pharo download scripts every 2 months:), so if there are plans to summarily drop download support for Ubuntu12.04 in the near future, then I'd rather know about that before I touch my scripts:) Dale

April 13, 2015