- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by Ben Coman

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> >>>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:12, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo VM from inside the image ? >>>> >>>> If I???m not mistaken, it is what OSProcess is for. I think this should be it: >>>> >>>>> OSProcess thisOSProcess pid. >>>> >>>> The comment of thisOSProcess says: >>>> >>>> "Answer a single instance of the class corresponding to the OS process in which this Smalltalk image is executing." >>> >>> OK, that seems to works in Pharo 5. Thanks. >>> >>> I don't know the overall status of OSProcess in Pharo though. Is is 100% supported in all current versions, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 ? Is it based on a plugin or on native boost ? Should it be included by default ? >>> >> >> It should be working in all Pharo versions. It is based on a VM plugin. >> >> I am the author of OSProcess, and I try to keep it working in Pharo as well >> as Squeak. Thierry Goubier also works on OSProcess for Pharo (and he has write >> access to the repository). >> >> No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be >> an external package. > > mmmâ¦ we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we can profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). > why do you think it should be external? We should distinguish between having it traditionally-in-Image where that is the only place it exists and fixes are integrated, and the current trend (e.g. in-Image Glamorous Tools) where fixes are integrated "upstream" into an external package cheer -ben

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] UUID for the Session?

by Marcus Denker

> On 14 Sep 2015, at 12:50, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Iâve noticed that there is a Session class, which is meant to be used as a unique identifier of an image session. Is it possible to obtain some king of identifier of it? I.e. if I want to compare some data associated with session outside of the image. If not, maybe we can simply create a new UUID in Session>>initialize and store it in an ivar? > A UUID per session could be a nice thing, yes. Marcus

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by phil＠highoctane.be

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> > >>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:12, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo > VM from inside the image ? > >>> > >>> If I???m not mistaken, it is what OSProcess is for. I think this > should be it: > >>> > >>>> OSProcess thisOSProcess pid. > >>> > >>> The comment of thisOSProcess says: > >>> > >>> "Answer a single instance of the class corresponding to the OS process > in which this Smalltalk image is executing." > >> > >> OK, that seems to works in Pharo 5. Thanks. > >> > >> I don't know the overall status of OSProcess in Pharo though. Is is > 100% supported in all current versions, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 ? Is it based on a > plugin or on native boost ? Should it be included by default ? > >> > > > > It should be working in all Pharo versions. It is based on a VM plugin. > > > > I am the author of OSProcess, and I try to keep it working in Pharo as > well > > as Squeak. Thierry Goubier also works on OSProcess for Pharo (and he has > write > > access to the repository). > > > > No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be > > an external package. > > mmmâ¦ we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we can > profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). > why do you think it should be external? > Would be nice to have it in. It is one of the first things I load in my images. How else can we access environment variables, pids, ... ? Beware: some version have issues of performance (in Pharo3). Phil > > Esteban > > > > > Dave > > > > > > >

Sept. 14, 2015

[Issue tracker] Reviews needed

by Marcus Denker

Hi, Please do not forget to review issuesâ¦ people have no idea how much simpler it is to get these things in (or not) based on multiple peoples judgement as opposed to just two (or even one). https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/45/Review Marcus

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:12, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo VM from inside the image ? >>> >>> If I???m not mistaken, it is what OSProcess is for. I think this should be it: >>> >>>> OSProcess thisOSProcess pid. >>> >>> The comment of thisOSProcess says: >>> >>> "Answer a single instance of the class corresponding to the OS process in which this Smalltalk image is executing." >> >> OK, that seems to works in Pharo 5. Thanks. >> >> I don't know the overall status of OSProcess in Pharo though. Is is 100% supported in all current versions, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 ? Is it based on a plugin or on native boost ? Should it be included by default ? >> > > It should be working in all Pharo versions. It is based on a VM plugin. > > I am the author of OSProcess, and I try to keep it working in Pharo as well > as Squeak. Thierry Goubier also works on OSProcess for Pharo (and he has write > access to the repository). > > No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be > an external package. mmmâ¦ we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we can profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). why do you think it should be external? Esteban > > Dave > >

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by David T. Lewis

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:12, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo VM from inside the image ? > > > > If I???m not mistaken, it is what OSProcess is for. I think this should be it: > > > >> OSProcess thisOSProcess pid. > > > > The comment of thisOSProcess says: > > > > "Answer a single instance of the class corresponding to the OS process in which this Smalltalk image is executing." > > OK, that seems to works in Pharo 5. Thanks. > > I don't know the overall status of OSProcess in Pharo though. Is is 100% supported in all current versions, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 ? Is it based on a plugin or on native boost ? Should it be included by default ? > It should be working in all Pharo versions. It is based on a VM plugin. I am the author of OSProcess, and I try to keep it working in Pharo as well as Squeak. Thierry Goubier also works on OSProcess for Pharo (and he has write access to the repository). No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be an external package. Dave

Sept. 14, 2015

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/50322 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Sept. 14, 2015

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 23abad: 50322

by GitHub

Branch: refs/heads/5.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 23abada802d46131b83481872d8dc5e1972d04a9 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/23abada802d46131b8348187… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2015-09-14 (Mon, 14 Sep 2015) Changed paths: M BlueInk-Core.package/BIConfigurableFormatter.class/instance/private-formatting/formatBlockArgumentsFor_.st R Collections-Abstract.package/extension/RxMatcher/instance/split_indicesDo_.st M FileSystem-Core.package/ManifestFileSystemCore.class/class/meta-data - dependency analyser/manuallyResolvedDependencies.st R FileSystem-Core.package/Path.class/class/as yet unclassified/cleanUp.st R FileSystem-Core.package/Path.class/class/private/absoluteWindowsPathRegex.st M FileSystem-Core.package/Path.class/class/private/isAbsoluteWindowsPath_.st A FileSystem-Tests-Core.package/PathTest.class/instance/tests/testIsAbsoluteWindowsPathReturnsFalseWhenNoWindowsAbsolutePathProvided.st A FileSystem-Tests-Core.package/PathTest.class/instance/tests/testIsAbsoluteWindowsPathReturnsTrueWhenWindowsAbsolutePathProvided.st A Regex-Core.package/RxMatcher.class/instance/splitjoin/split_indicesDo_.st R ScriptLoader50.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script50321.st A ScriptLoader50.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script50322.st R ScriptLoader50.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update50321.st A ScriptLoader50.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update50322.st M ScriptLoader50.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st Log Message: ----------- 50322 16557 FileSystem-Core should not depend on Regex-Core https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16557 16550 Bad BlueInk block formatting https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16550 16558 Collections-Abstract should not depend on Regex-Core https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16558 http://files.pharo.org/image/50/50322.zip

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > >> On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:12, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo VM from inside the image ? >> >> If Iâm not mistaken, it is what OSProcess is for. I think this should be it: >> >>> OSProcess thisOSProcess pid. >> >> The comment of thisOSProcess says: >> >> "Answer a single instance of the class corresponding to the OS process in which this Smalltalk image is executing." > > OK, that seems to works in Pharo 5. Thanks. > > I don't know the overall status of OSProcess in Pharo though. Is is 100% supported in all current versions, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 ? Is it based on a plugin or on native boost ? Should it be included by default ? 100% Plugin yes it should :) Esteban ps: But the plugin has some problems in windows. So, it is supported 100% of the support it providesâ¦ so we need to improve that :P > > >

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 14 Sep 2015, at 11:11, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: > > Did anyone ever look at my OS projects at http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~OS > where I try to unify the native platforms (to keep platform independence) > while on the other side allow to use native functionality as much as possible: > > > Gofer it > smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'MetaRepoForPharo40'; > configurationOf: 'OSUnix'; > loadVersion: #stable. > > => UnixProcess currentProcessId OK, that works, thanks. Pretty straightforward NativeBoost based code, small. I seem to be missing the platform independence code (but I only care for OS X and Linux for my projects). How does this relate to OSProcess ? Why did you start it ? What is the goal ? > Gofer it > smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'MetaRepoForPharo40'; > configurationOf: 'OSWindows'; > loadVersion: #stable. > > => WinProcess currentProcessId > > Have fun > T. > >> Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2015 um 11:04 Uhr >> Von: "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <sven(a)stfx.eu> >> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org> >> Betreff: [Pharo-dev] PID of VM ? >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to get the operating system PID of the running Pharo VM from inside the image ? >> >> If not, I think that would be a nice addition. >> >> Sven >> >> >> >

Sept. 14, 2015