- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are people using the Pharo VM builds from BinTray?

by Stephan Eggermont

David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: > Is anyone using the Pharo VMs from BinTray? Otherwise if it's not a problem > for any Pharo users, I think the CI proprietors would like to turn off > some of their unnecessary builds to save resources. My understanding is > that the builds can easily be turned back on as needed in the future. I use them once in a while. Useful when triangulating issues Stephan

Dec. 13, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1073: Revert "5223-Remove-blueInk-packages-from-repository"

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1073 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5377 was integrated: "Revert "5223-Remove-blueInk-packages-from-repository"" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5377 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/revert Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Dec. 13, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1072: Improving comments of ffiCall: and ffiLibrary.

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1072 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #5357 was integrated: "Improving comments of ffiCall: and ffiLibrary." Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5357 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5352 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Dec. 13, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1071: Revert "Revert "[Perfs] x10 on method compiling with #deferFlushDuring

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1071 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5374 was integrated: "Revert "Revert "[Perfs] x10 on method compiling with #deferFlushDuring" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5374 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5292 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Dec. 13, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are people using the Pharo VM builds from BinTray?

by David T. Lewis

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:33:29AM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > > > On 12 Dec 2019, at 23:20, David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There is an automated CI build for opensmalltalk VMs with artifacts for > > Pharo, Squeak, and Newspeak at https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/. > > I suspect that the Pharo builds may be redundant with the official PharoVM > > distributions. > > Those VMs are also copied into our file sever and we take them from there. > > > Is anyone using the Pharo VMs from BinTray? Otherwise if it's not a problem > > for any Pharo users, I think the CI proprietors would like to turn off > > some of their unnecessary builds to save resources. My understanding is > > that the builds can easily be turned back on as needed in the future. > > I do not think we use the bintray, but we still use the osvm builds as our standard distribution. > > > > > Fabio asked Marcel who asked me, so I am asking you :-) > > So I???m answering you so you can answer Marcel who can tell Fabio ;) > Thanks Esteban :-) Dave

Dec. 13, 2019

[ANN] EventRecorder legacy put online

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, For those who need the deprecated (and removed) GT-EventRecorder, I have put the original packages in pharo-contributions/EventRecorder (legacy branch). To load it, you just need to execute: Metacello new repository: 'github://pharo-contributions/EventRecorder:legacy'; baseline: 'EventRecorder'; load. This way you may continue loading Roassal2 (or others) until they fix the baseline :) (Btw, installation will still fail because Matrix has been removedâ¦ but this one was indeed deprecated in P7 (is replaced by Array2D), a problem you can overcome by executing Array2D subclass: #Matrix Previous to load Roassal2. I hope this solves the problems causes lasts weeks. Cheers, Esteban

Dec. 13, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are people using the Pharo VM builds from BinTray?

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, > On 12 Dec 2019, at 23:20, David T. Lewis <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > There is an automated CI build for opensmalltalk VMs with artifacts for > Pharo, Squeak, and Newspeak at https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/. > I suspect that the Pharo builds may be redundant with the official PharoVM > distributions. Those VMs are also copied into our file sever and we take them from there. > Is anyone using the Pharo VMs from BinTray? Otherwise if it's not a problem > for any Pharo users, I think the CI proprietors would like to turn off > some of their unnecessary builds to save resources. My understanding is > that the builds can easily be turned back on as needed in the future. I do not think we use the bintray, but we still use the osvm builds as our standard distribution. > > Fabio asked Marcel who asked me, so I am asking you :-) So Iâm answering you so you can answer Marcel who can tell Fabio ;) Esteban > > Thanks, > Dave > >

Dec. 13, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1070: Reword of ZnClient ifFail: method comment

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1070 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5371 was integrated: "Reword of ZnClient ifFail: method comment" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5371 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/ZnClient Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Dec. 13, 2019

Are people using the Pharo VM builds from BinTray?

by David T. Lewis

Hi, There is an automated CI build for opensmalltalk VMs with artifacts for Pharo, Squeak, and Newspeak at https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/. I suspect that the Pharo builds may be redundant with the official PharoVM distributions. Is anyone using the Pharo VMs from BinTray? Otherwise if it's not a problem for any Pharo users, I think the CI proprietors would like to turn off some of their unnecessary builds to save resources. My understanding is that the builds can easily be turned back on as needed in the future. Fabio asked Marcel who asked me, so I am asking you :-) Thanks, Dave

Dec. 12, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1069: Announcements: Small Cleanup

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1069 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5367 was integrated: "Announcements: Small Cleanup" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5367 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/AnnouncementsClean Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Dec. 12, 2019