- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[pharo-project/pharo-core]

by GitHub

Branch: refs/tags/50695 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

April 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] correct 32bit libssl library for CentOS 7.2?

by Pierce Ng

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 09:54:24AM +0200, Bernhard Pieber wrote: > Googling did not bring up any solution so far. Any help would be greatly > appreciated. If you have the 32bit C development toolchain installed you can try building from source. I wrote a blog post on swapping in LibreSSL for OpenSSL. I use Ubuntu but in this case the distro shouldn't matter. http://www.samadhiweb.com/blog/2015.10.22.libressl.html Pierce

April 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5 prepackaged not working

by jannik laval

2016-04-17 9:54 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr>: > > > Le 17/4/16 07:46, jannik laval a Ã©crit : > >> Hi Pharoers, >> >> I tried to use prepackaged pharo 5 (pharo5-win) but it does not work. >> > What do you mean prepackaged Pharo 5? Oups, I forgot the link: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-5.0-Update-Step-5-Publish/ I tried the pharo5.0-win. > > > Same for the CI of phratch. the pharo prepackage for linux, mac and win do >> not work. >> > > Esteban is getting back monday we will discuss about pharo 50 installation > because we need it for the mooc > and the mooc starts in about a month: arghhhhhh :) > > > >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> ~~Jannik Laval~~ >> Enseignant-chercheur >> Responsable PÃ©dagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet en SystÃ¨me >> d'Information >> IUT LumiÃ¨re, UniversitÃ© Lyon LumiÃ¨re >> laboratoire DISP >> http://www.jannik-laval.eu >> http://www.phratch.com >> http://www.approchealpes.info >> > > > -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ Enseignant-chercheur Responsable PÃ©dagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet en SystÃ¨me d'Information IUT LumiÃ¨re, UniversitÃ© Lyon LumiÃ¨re laboratoire DISP http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info

April 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] correct 32bit libssl library for CentOS 7.2?

by Fabio Niephaus

I'm not sure if it works on CentOS, but maybe try to use a SqueakSSL plugin version from: https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeakssl/releases This one is the latest: https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeakssl/releases/download/v0.2.0b/squ… Fabio On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 at 09:54, Bernhard Pieber <bernhard(a)pieber.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using Pharo 4 on CentOS 7.2 and want to make an https request from > the image, e.g. > > ZnClient new > url: 'https://www.google.com'; > get > > I get the following error, stating the library libssl.so.1.0.0 is not > found: > ioLoadModule(/home/pharo/test/pharo-vm/libSqueakSSL.so): > libssl.so.1.0.0: Cannot open Shared-Object-File: File or directory not > found > > This is not entirely unexpected, because 32bit libraries need to be > installed: > [pharo@centos-pharo test]$ ldd pharo-vm/libSqueakSSL.so > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf77db000) > libssl.so.1.0.0 => not found > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7611000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf77dc000) > > I found the following very helpful list of libraries needed for CentOS 6.5: > > https://github.com/philippeback/pharovm-centos65/blob/master/packages-to-in… > > It includes openssl.i686 version 1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4, which I assume should > provide the missing library file. > > However, when I try to install I get the following error: > [pharo@centos-pharo test]$ sudo yum install openssl.i686 > [sudo] password for pharo: > Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror > base > > | 3.6 kB 00:00:00 > extras > > | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 > updates > > | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * base: mirror.23media.de > * extras: mirror.23media.de > * updates: ftp.plusline.de > No package openssl.i686 available. > Error: Nothing to do > > I looks like the library was available for CentOS 6.5 but for 7.2 not > anymore. I am not sure why. Heartbleed, maybe? > > Googling did not bring up any solution so far. Any help would be greatly > appreciated. > > Bernhard

April 17, 2016

correct 32bit libssl library for CentOS 7.2?

by Bernhard Pieber

Hi, I am using Pharo 4 on CentOS 7.2 and want to make an https request from the image, e.g. ZnClient new url: 'https://www.google.com'; get I get the following error, stating the library libssl.so.1.0.0 is not found: ioLoadModule(/home/pharo/test/pharo-vm/libSqueakSSL.so): libssl.so.1.0.0: Cannot open Shared-Object-File: File or directory not found This is not entirely unexpected, because 32bit libraries need to be installed: [pharo@centos-pharo test]$ ldd pharo-vm/libSqueakSSL.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf77db000) libssl.so.1.0.0 => not found libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7611000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf77dc000) I found the following very helpful list of libraries needed for CentOS 6.5: https://github.com/philippeback/pharovm-centos65/blob/master/packages-to-in… It includes openssl.i686 version 1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4, which I assume should provide the missing library file. However, when I try to install I get the following error: [pharo@centos-pharo test]$ sudo yum install openssl.i686 [sudo] password for pharo: Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror base | 3.6 kB 00:00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 updates | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.23media.de * extras: mirror.23media.de * updates: ftp.plusline.de No package openssl.i686 available. Error: Nothing to do I looks like the library was available for CentOS 6.5 but for 7.2 not anymore. I am not sure why. Heartbleed, maybe? Googling did not bring up any solution so far. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Bernhard

April 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5 prepackaged not working

by stepharo

Le 17/4/16 07:46, jannik laval a Ã©crit : > Hi Pharoers, > > I tried to use prepackaged pharo 5 (pharo5-win) but it does not work. What do you mean prepackaged Pharo 5? > Same for the CI of phratch. the pharo prepackage for linux, mac and > win do not work. Esteban is getting back monday we will discuss about pharo 50 installation because we need it for the mooc and the mooc starts in about a month: arghhhhhh :) > > Cheers, > > -- > ~~Jannik Laval~~ > Enseignant-chercheur > Responsable PÃ©dagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet en SystÃ¨me > d'Information > IUT LumiÃ¨re, UniversitÃ© Lyon LumiÃ¨re > laboratoire DISP > http://www.jannik-laval.eu > http://www.phratch.com > http://www.approchealpes.info

April 17, 2016

Questions About Garage

by stepharo

Hi Olivier Auverlot is writing a nice article on Garage for Linux mag and I got some questions that popped up. Guillermo is on holiday now for a week but I still want to put on paper my questions: To check for a driver we pass a symbol GADriver isAvailable: #postgresv2 I found that a bit error prone Olivier creates also manually the connection string MesCD >> MesCDConnectionString ^'postgresV2://localhost:5432/mescd?user=olivier&password=motdepasse' Here the postgresV2 has an upper case. So I'm wondering if we missed something. I was thinking that I would expect more something like that: GADriver isAvailable: GADriver postgresv2 and MesCD >> MesCDConnectionString ^ GADriver postgresV2 base: 'mescd' user: 'olivier' pass: 'motdepasse' And we can imagine to have variation for port and url

April 17, 2016

Pharo 5 prepackaged not working

by jannik laval

Hi Pharoers, I tried to use prepackaged pharo 5 (pharo5-win) but it does not work. Same for the CI of phratch. the pharo prepackage for linux, mac and win do not work. Cheers, -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ Enseignant-chercheur Responsable PÃ©dagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet en SystÃ¨me d'Information IUT LumiÃ¨re, UniversitÃ© Lyon LumiÃ¨re laboratoire DISP http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info

April 17, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] GTDebugger shortcuts usability

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

> > Letâs turn this energy into something positive. Please propose a concrete > set of default keybindings that you think would work better. In this > process, please take into account all keybindings that are already defined > in the code editor (it might not be so easy as it appears). > As I've said: 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is underlined? as for the shortcuts themselves, problem is proceed, restart & into proceed: ctrl+shift+p is not taken, so I don't see why it has shortcut confusing with restart restart: ctrl+shift+r indents, but I'd argue that uniformity is more important here... indent is just convenience into: ctrl+shift+i is taken (I've never used it, but it maybe it's important), but we can still use ctrl+shift+n and underline n (point 2) If points 1 & 2 are implemented, then the letter is not as important, although first letter is always preferable. Peter > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Apr 16, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm getting fed-up with GTDebugger shortcuts since they are completely > random. > > > > Can we have them more meaningful and/or somehow visible? > > > > For now I ended up overriding the labels so I can at least see them... > but doing this is also stupid, because I still have to look at them since I > cannot remember random shortcuts. > > > > <debugger.png> > > â > > 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) > > 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is > underlined? > > > > Peter > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Value is always contextual." > > > > > >

April 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-dev] GTDebugger shortcuts usability

by Tudor Girba

Hi Peter, Letâs turn this energy into something positive. Please propose a concrete set of default keybindings that you think would work better. In this process, please take into account all keybindings that are already defined in the code editor (it might not be so easy as it appears). Cheers, Doru > On Apr 16, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm getting fed-up with GTDebugger shortcuts since they are completely random. > > Can we have them more meaningful and/or somehow visible? > > For now I ended up overriding the labels so I can at least see them... but doing this is also stupid, because I still have to look at them since I cannot remember random shortcuts. > > <debugger.png> > â > 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) > 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is underlined? > > Peter -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Value is always contextual."

April 16, 2016