- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Dimitris Chloupis

I had a merge issue once, but merge issues are normal never saw them as problem and with the git gui client I am using it took me a few seconds to resolve. I have not done a pull request but I do not see why I would have any problem There is also a filetree version without any metadata if I remember correctly that I always wanted to give a try but because I know how to avoid merge issues I never had good enough reason to give it a try. In case of merge issue its just about choosing which version will overwrite the other one which is something my git gui client handles automagically with minimum input from me On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote: > No issues when merging? What about pull-request? > > Alexandre > > > > On Jan 8, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > has worked perfect for , definetly a tons better than sthub and > squeaksource and definitely more stable . I do not think I ever experienced > a single problem with git and pharo. > > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:19 PM Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> > wrote: > > On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > > Squeaksource ? > > > > > > Was it not made read only ? > > > > It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load > > ss3 was always stable > > > > > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > > > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far > stable > > > than sthub > > > > No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the > > progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need > > support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work > > everywhere. Not there yet. > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > >

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Alexandre Bergel

No issues when merging? What about pull-request? Alexandre > On Jan 8, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > has worked perfect for , definetly a tons better than sthub and squeaksource and definitely more stable . I do not think I ever experienced a single problem with git and pharo. > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:19 PM Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > Squeaksource ? > > > > Was it not made read only ? > > It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load > ss3 was always stable > > > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable > > than sthub > > No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the > progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need > support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work > everywhere. Not there yet. > > Stephan > > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Dimitris Chloupis

has worked perfect for , definetly a tons better than sthub and squeaksource and definitely more stable . I do not think I ever experienced a single problem with git and pharo. On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:19 PM Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > Squeaksource ? > > > > Was it not made read only ? > > It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load > ss3 was always stable > > > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable > > than sthub > > No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the > progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need > support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work > everywhere. Not there yet. > > Stephan > > > >

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Alexandre Bergel

> I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg. Stef, to me, you are the perfect idea / tool debugger :-) Let us know about your impression and experience report using Iceberg. Alexandre > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > crapâ¦ I will need to check a bit more. > > Esteban > > ps: (maybe a good moment to start testing iceberg and moving projects to git support?) If you execute this: > > Metacello new > baseline: 'Iceberg'; > repository: 'github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes'; > load. > IceRepository defaultBackendType: #IceLibgitLocalRepository. > > in one of the VMs here: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ (the 32bits versions) > latest version should work. > > *except* in macOS where you need to modify > > LGitLibrary>>macModuleName > > to answer 'libgit2.dylib' > > >> On 6 Jan 2017, at 15:14, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> No wait, now the list of teams is empty ? I am not in any team anymore ? >> But I can see my name in the list of members of project Pharo >> >> 2017-01-06 15:05 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com>: >> >> >> 2017-01-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >> I restarted it and now I see 3 projectsâ¦ is that correct? >> >> YES >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> All my projects at smalltalkhub.com are gone - again. >>> (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~NicolaiHess) >> >> >> > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Stephan Eggermont

On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > Squeaksource ? > > Was it not made read only ? It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load ss3 was always stable > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable > than sthub No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work everywhere. Not there yet. Stephan

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Dimitris Chloupis

Squeaksource ? This even more weird Was it not made read only ? It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable than sthub On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 at 13:28, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > On 08/01/17 11:22, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > people still using smalltalkhub ? wow > > Yes, nearly everyone is still using smalltalkhub > and squeaksource and ss3. > > Stephan > > > >

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Stephan Eggermont

On 08/01/17 11:22, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > people still using smalltalkhub ? wow Yes, nearly everyone is still using smalltalkhub and squeaksource and ss3. Stephan

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Dimitris Chloupis

people still using smalltalkhub ? wow I use it only for MetaRepo, can we please move metarepos also to gihub, there is no reason for them to stay in sthub On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:41 AM Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > crapâ¦ I will need to check a bit more. > > Esteban > > ps: (maybe a good moment to start testing iceberg and moving projects to > git support?) If you execute this: > > Metacello new > baseline: 'Iceberg'; > repository: 'github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes'; > load. > IceRepository defaultBackendType: #IceLibgitLocalRepository. > > in one of the VMs here: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ (the > 32bits versions) > latest version should work. > > *except* in macOS where you need to modify > > LGitLibrary>>macModuleName > > to answer 'libgit2.dylib' > > > On 6 Jan 2017, at 15:14, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > No wait, now the list of teams is empty ? I am not in any team anymore ? > But I can see my name in the list of members of project Pharo > > 2017-01-06 15:05 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com>: > > > > 2017-01-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: > > I restarted it and now I see 3 projectsâ¦ is that correct? > > > YES > > Thanks. > > > > > Esteban > > On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > All my projects at smalltalkhub.com are gone - again. > (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~NicolaiHess) > > > > > > >

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] ***Important*** Snapcraft pharo package for Pharo 50

by Stephane Ducasse

Yes we checked that with Damien and we should think about them for Pharo 60. On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 4:40 PM, philippe.back(a)highoctane.be < philippe.back(a)gmail.com> wrote: > There are docker images for Pharo already. > > E.g. https://hub.docker.com/r/geraudster/docker-pharo/~/dockerfile/ > > Phil > > Le 6 janv. 2017 19:11, "Damien Pollet" <damien.pollet(a)gmail.com> a Ã©crit : > >> Docker seems pretty nice as well, with the added bonus that it can be >> hosted on Mac and Windows, and is probably a bit lighter since containers >> are not full-system. >> >> About installing Pharo, I'd guess that the adhoc install procedure is a >> problem. Whatever the dependencies, it's easier for admins to install stuff >> if it's just another package that fits with the rest of their distribution. >> >

Jan. 8, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] No Projects at smalltalkhub

by Stephane Ducasse

I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > crapâ¦ I will need to check a bit more. > > Esteban > > ps: (maybe a good moment to start testing iceberg and moving projects to > git support?) If you execute this: > > Metacello new > baseline: 'Iceberg'; > repository: 'github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes'; > load. > IceRepository defaultBackendType: #IceLibgitLocalRepository. > > in one of the VMs here: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ (the > 32bits versions) > latest version should work. > > *except* in macOS where you need to modify > > LGitLibrary>>macModuleName > > to answer 'libgit2.dylib' > > > On 6 Jan 2017, at 15:14, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > No wait, now the list of teams is empty ? I am not in any team anymore ? > But I can see my name in the list of members of project Pharo > > 2017-01-06 15:05 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com>: > >> >> >> 2017-01-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> I restarted it and now I see 3 projectsâ¦ is that correct? >>> >> >> YES >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> All my projects at smalltalkhub.com are gone - again. >>> (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~NicolaiHess) >>> >>> >>> >> > >

Jan. 8, 2017