- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo 9.0] Build #437: LiteralVariable-methodNode-remove

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #437 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6740 was integrated: "LiteralVariable-methodNode-remove" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6740 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/LiteralVariable Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 30, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #436: Allow-Compiling-Syntax-Errors-NonInteractively

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #436 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6730 was integrated: "Allow-Compiling-Syntax-Errors-NonInteractively" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6730 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Allow Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 30, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #435: Introduce Collections-Unordered-Tests and tag SortedCollectionTest correctly

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #435 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6726 was integrated: "Introduce Collections-Unordered-Tests and tag SortedCollectionTest correctly" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6726 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6725 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 30, 2020

is it possible to send data using form

by shawon58

Hello Normally i know data can be send from the form and can be display in the result pan but i want to know is it possible to send some value like height width from the form and save those data as a text file ? if any one have idea about this please share with me. Thanks for your kind help -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

June 30, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #434: ScopeLevel-only-MethodScope

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #434 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6734 was integrated: "ScopeLevel-only-MethodScope" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6734 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/ScopeLevel Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 29, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #433: Dictionary-no-hasTempVector

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #433 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6735 was integrated: "Dictionary-no-hasTempVector" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6735 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Dictionary Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 29, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Thanks again, Esteban, it works well ! Travis CI picked up the latest version as well. I got one project using Integer>>#byteAt: now, https://github.com/svenvc/NeoUniversalBinaryJSON , that cleanly builds on Pharo 7, 8 and 9 using one code base: https://travis-ci.org/github/svenvc/NeoUniversalBinaryJSON Cool. I'll be moving my other projects using that method (MQTT, P3 and Zinc) in the coming days. Sven > On 29 Jun 2020, at 11:07, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu> wrote: > > yes > > On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 11:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >> And will I get that version using >> >> $ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash >> >> and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ? >> >> >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu >> > wrote: >> >> ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version. >> >> Esteban >> >> On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >> sven(a)stfx.eu >> > wrote: >> >> OK, thanks. >> >> >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano < >> estebanlm(a)netc.eu >> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Sven, >> >> In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in this case I think we should have done this as last task before closing it. >> I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it should be an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will not know until we try ;) ) >> >> Esteban >> >> On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >> >> sven(a)stfx.eu >> >> > wrote: >> >> PING: I still did not yet get any answer. >> >> >> On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >> >> sven(a)stfx.eu >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ? >> >> There are 18 commits after 7.0.4 >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0 >> >> >> >> >> I need the following >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079 >> >> >> >> >> which is one of the 18 commits >> >> Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 because #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now removed. >> >> In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 7.0.5 and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package. >> >> What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More testing ? Where is the artefact to test ? >> >> Thx, >> >> Sven >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

June 29, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

by Esteban Lorenzano

yes On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 11:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > And will I get that version using > > $ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash > > and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ? > >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu >> <mailto:estebanlm@netc.eu>> wrote: >> >> ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version. >> >> Esteban >> >> On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe >> <sven(a)stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>> wrote: >>> OK, thanks. >>> >>> >>> On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu >>> <mailto:estebanlm@netc.eu> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sven, >>> >>> In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in >>> this case I think we should have done this as last task before >>> closing it. >>> I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it >>> should be an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we >>> will not know until we try ;) ) >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >>> sven(a)stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> PING: I still did not yet get any answer. >>> >>> >>> On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >>> sven(a)stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ? >>> >>> There are 18 commits after 7.0.4 >>> >>> >>> >>> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0> >>> >>> >>> >>> I need the following >>> >>> >>> >>> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079> >>> >>> >>> >>> which is one of the 18 commits >>> >>> Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 >>> because #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now >>> removed. >>> >>> In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as >>> 7.0.5 and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my >>> Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package. >>> >>> What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More >>> testing ? Where is the artefact to test ? >>> >>> Thx, >>> >>> Sven >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >

June 29, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

And will I get that version using $ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ? > On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu> wrote: > > ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version. > > Esteban > > On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >> OK, thanks. >> >> >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)netc.eu >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Sven, >> >> In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in this case I think we should have done this as last task before closing it. >> I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it should be an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will not know until we try ;) ) >> >> Esteban >> >> On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >> sven(a)stfx.eu >> > wrote: >> >> PING: I still did not yet get any answer. >> >> >> On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe < >> sven(a)stfx.eu >> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ? >> >> There are 18 commits after 7.0.4 >> >> >> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0 >> >> >> >> I need the following >> >> >> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079 >> >> >> >> which is one of the 18 commits >> >> Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 because #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now removed. >> >> In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 7.0.5 and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package. >> >> What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More testing ? Where is the artefact to test ? >> >> Thx, >> >> Sven >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

June 29, 2020

[Pharo 7.0] Build #177: Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #177 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #5075 was integrated: "Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5075 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/Backport Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 29, 2020