- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Logos

by Serge Stinckwich

When the icon is small, the lighthouse is not easily recognizable. 2008/6/18 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Samuel MORELLO <samuel.morello(a)ouvanous.com> >> Date: June 18, 2008 10:55:19 AM CEDT >> To: StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> Subject: Re: [OUVANOUS] Re: Nouvelle version >> >> les voici ;-) >> >> Le 18 juin 08 Ã 10:39, StÃ©phane DUCASSE a Ã©crit : >> >>> --- Reply ABOVE THIS LINE to post a comment to the project --- >>> >>> Company: Smalltalk >>> Project: Pharo >>> Link: https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/C18821220 >>> >>> StÃ©phane DUCASSE said: >>> >>> ou cela :) >>> >>> >>> .......................................................................... >>> >>> Read the original message, view this comment, and download attachments >>> at: >>> https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/C18821220 >>> >>> You can always check the Overview for the latest project activity: >>> https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/projects/1873269/project/log > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- Serge Stinckwich Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/

June 18, 2008

[Pharo-project] Logos

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Begin forwarded message: > From: Samuel MORELLO <samuel.morello(a)ouvanous.com> > Date: June 18, 2008 10:55:19 AM CEDT > To: StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Subject: Re: [OUVANOUS] Re: Nouvelle version > > les voici ;-) > > Le 18 juin 08 Ã 10:39, StÃ©phane DUCASSE a Ã©crit : > >> --- Reply ABOVE THIS LINE to post a comment to the project --- >> >> Company: Smalltalk >> Project: Pharo >> Link: https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/C18821220 >> >> StÃ©phane DUCASSE said: >> >> ou cela :) >> >> .......................................................................... >> >> Read the original message, view this comment, and download >> attachments at: >> https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/C18821220 >> >> You can always check the Overview for the latest project activity: >> https://ouvanous.projectpath.com/projects/1873269/project/log

June 18, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Missing PluggableTextController and PluggableTextView

by Damien Cassou

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)free.fr> wrote: > On Tuesday 17 June 2008 14:43:29 Alain Plantec wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 June 2008 14:25:28 Damien Cassou wrote: >>> >> I've found another problem related to view instance variable + OB. >> I will report it tonight. > Hi Damien and Andrew, > Controller 'view' instance variable has been removed. > In pharo-dev, Undeclared shows a 'view' key which is referenced from OBTextMorphEditor, > OBTextMorphEditorWithShout and TextMorphForShoutEditor. > I've attached 2 separated fixes (for OB and for shout). Are these fixes compatible with the new Shout (published yesterday)? Are these fixes compatible with Squeak? If both answers are yes, please commit your fix to OB directly to source.wiresong.ca/ob (no need for a password). And send the Shout fix to Andrew. Bye -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

June 18, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Reintegration of StringSocket

by Damien Cassou

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've just published a new version of Universes which includes > StringSocket and its super class ObjectSocket (renamed > StringSocketStream and ObjectSocketStream). I have also replaced > direct references to other Nebraska classes (CanvasEncoder and > NebraskaDebuger) to: > > Smalltalk at: #NebraskaDebugger ifPresent: [:debug | debug ...]. > > It seems to me these classes were only used to log things. Do you agree Lex? >From Lex who is not on the list: Â«Yes, that looks like a great change. Also, I like the general strategy of splitting StringSocket from Nebraska. StringSocket was always meant to be usable by itself.Â» -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

June 18, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Missing PluggableTextController and PluggableTextView

by Alain Plantec

On Tuesday 17 June 2008 14:43:29 Alain Plantec wrote: > On Tuesday 17 June 2008 14:25:28 Damien Cassou wrote: >> > I've found another problem related to view instance variable + OB. > I will report it tonight. Hi Damien and Andrew, Controller 'view' instance variable has been removed. In pharo-dev, Undeclared shows a 'view' key which is referenced from OBTextMorphEditor, OBTextMorphEditorWithShout and TextMorphForShoutEditor. I've attached 2 separated fixes (for OB and for shout). Cheers alain > > cheers > alain > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >

June 18, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Re: Re: Re: MissingPluggableTextControllerandPluggableTextView

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Excellent! Excellent! I like this feeling. Soon (more or less) we will be able to focus on the making of new things (versus the cleaning). Please note that I truly respect what was done (even if I can have really harsh statement), I'm not idiot and know that building is far more difficult than removing them. It would be good to think about a first release of pharo the milestone says: - tests green Stef On Jun 17, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com > > wrote: >>> Unfortunately, I can't add it to Universes > > Done > > -- > Damien Cassou > Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good > luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Re: Missing PluggableTextController andPluggableTextView

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

this would be really cool :) Stef On Jun 17, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Andrew Tween wrote: > I'll take a look and see if I can create a Pharo compatible Shout, > > Andy > > > "Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6ac749c10806170525r2da65fbr17a00ce24f0cd041@mail.gmail.com > ... > I've just update my image to 10041 and tried to generate a pharo-dev > from it. However, the process failed while trying to install Shout > because it depends on PluggableTextController and PluggableTextView > which are not in the image anymore. > > -- > Damien Cassou > Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good > luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] New pharo-dev based on latest version

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

cooool On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Damien Cassou wrote: > I've just published a new pharo-dev version on: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Downloads?tm=2. It is based on > version 10041 which contains cleaning of MVC. > > -- > Damien Cassou > Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good > luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] MVC removal step two harvested

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

good that someone is chekcing, I was in a meeting. We should really define a process that should be run by me and after a machine automatically before updates :) Stef On Jun 17, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 13:35 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I harvested the changes proposed by alain for the removal of MVC. >> Please test pharo since it was a large change. >> > tests run as expected. There is one obsolete class left which > is referenced by MvcTextEditor. That sounds like it is to be > removed anyway ;) > > Otherwise a > > AppRegistry removeObsolete > > will do. > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] ObjectFinalizerTests understanding problems

by Norbert Hartl

On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:16 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Hi Norbert > > Since there was nobody else replying on the Squeak-dev mailing list, > what do we do? At least, my "fix" is not satisfying as it just works > around the actual problem. But then I don't feel like diving into the > finalization mechanism to fix it. I don't think its critical. I think > we should just remove the test (like they did in 3.10). > I agree. At the moment there is only one method that calls it and that method itself does not have a sender. The only other solution I can see is to change Object>>finalizationRegistry and I wouldn't dare :) +1 Norbert > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Jun 14, 2008, at 12:23 , Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 12:18 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> No idea :) > >> > >> may be ask in the squeak mailing-list? > >> > > You are right :) > > > > Norbert > >> On Jun 14, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> > >>> Before I recognized that Adrian fixed the > >>> > >>> ObjectFinalizerTests>>testFinalizationOfEquals > >>> > >>> I gave it try myself. I came to the same conclusion as Adrian > >>> how to fix. But now after knowing how it works I do not know > >>> why the test succeeds :) > >>> > >>> The test uses > >>> > >>> 1 to: 5 do: [:n | o := Object new. bag add: n. o toFinalizeSend: > >>> #remove: to: bag with: n]. > >>> 1 to: 5 do: [:n | o := Object new. bag add: n. o toFinalizeSend: > >>> #remove: to: bag with: n]. > >>> > >>> My problem is that toFinalizeSend:to:with adds an Objectfinalizer > >>> to the finalizationRegistry of the instance. But > >>> > >>> Object>>finalizationRegistry > >>> "Answer the finalization registry associated with the receiver." > >>> ^WeakRegistry default > >>> > >>> returns a global object which is WeakKeyDictionary. And > >>> > >>> | d | > >>> d := WeakKeyDictionary new. > >>> d at: (1 asString copy) put: $a. > >>> d at: (1 asString copy) put: $b. > >>> d size > >>> > >>> prints 1. To me that would exchange every entry from the first > >>> run by the second run (because the objects are equal). > >>> > >>> So I would assume that if there does not happen a run of the > >>> garbagecollector between the two loops the objects of the first > >>> loop should be still contained in the bag. But the test is named > >>> finalizationOfEquals so I have to assume: self doesNotUnderstand > >>> > >>> Can someone explain it to me, please? > >>> > >>> Norbert > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pharo-project mailing list > >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 17, 2008