- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Ok thanks alain. I think that you should also ping mike for his new event hierarchy because I would like to know if miro can be based on it :) Stef On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Alain Plantec wrote: > On Thursday 10 July 2008 18:23:56 StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> Yes I do not know the status of Etoy removal. >> It seems that alain went on holidays ? > > hello, > I'm here! About Etoy removal, nothing new. > I can work on it next week, but I prefer avoiding doing again what > Gary has already done. > Gary ? > > alain >> >>>> >>> Yep, I thought about that, too. I don't like to do unnecessary work. >>> I thought it would be good to be _ free at the earliest possible >>> date. >>> So I hope etoys goes away soon :) Than I give the unimplemented >>> calls >>> another shot. >>> >>> Norbert >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 11, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by Alain Plantec

On Thursday 10 July 2008 18:23:56 StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Yes I do not know the status of Etoy removal. > It seems that alain went on holidays ? hello, I'm here! About Etoy removal, nothing new. I can work on it next week, but I prefer avoiding doing again what Gary has already done. Gary ? alain > > >> > > Yep, I thought about that, too. I don't like to do unnecessary work. > > I thought it would be good to be _ free at the earliest possible date. > > So I hope etoys goes away soon :) Than I give the unimplemented calls > > another shot. > > > > Norbert > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes I do not know the status of Etoy removal. It seems that alain went on holidays ? >> > Yep, I thought about that, too. I don't like to do unnecessary work. > I thought it would be good to be _ free at the earliest possible date. > So I hope etoys goes away soon :) Than I give the unimplemented calls > another shot. > > Norbert >>

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by Norbert Hartl

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:31 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi norbert > > just a comment about 7080 you fixed all the _ in Etoy and related :) > But I will take the previous slice version because it is smaller. I > try to avoid to harvest etoy related fixes > because the package may not reload and since etoy should go away > anyway. I do not care and do not even > save them. > Yep, I thought about that, too. I don't like to do unnecessary work. I thought it would be good to be _ free at the earliest possible date. So I hope etoys goes away soon :) Than I give the unimplemented calls another shot. Norbert > Stef > > > On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for > > review: > > > > SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat > > SLICE-squeak7080 > > SLICE-squeak7081 > > SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser > > SLICE-squeak7083 > > > > And > > > > SLICE-squeakUpdate7073 > > > > is already in the updates and can be deleted. > > > > Norbert > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi norbert just a comment about 7080 you fixed all the _ in Etoy and related :) But I will take the previous slice version because it is smaller. I try to avoid to harvest etoy related fixes because the package may not reload and since etoy should go away anyway. I do not care and do not even save them. Stef On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for > review: > > SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat > SLICE-squeak7080 > SLICE-squeak7081 > SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser > SLICE-squeak7083 > > And > > SLICE-squeakUpdate7073 > > is already in the updates and can be deleted. > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Ok I could do it this evening. did you generate the new scripts when you moved stuff to the treatedInBox? Stef > Hi Stef, > > ok, I will do the next update. I will probably have time on Sunday > or beginning of next week. > > Adrian > > On Jul 9, 2008, at 20:11 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi adrian >> >> did you create new scriptloader entries? >> how do I sync with you? >> Do you do the next update? It would be good this way we check for >> real that >> your password is working. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jul 9, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 18:19 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> I moved all files related to this issue from the PharoInbox to >>>> PharoInboxTreated. >>>> Adrian >>>> >>> Great!!! Are you preparing a new update stream? >>> >>> Norbert >>>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 17:54 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:04 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>>>> I went through those changes and changed all to Verified except >>>>>> for >>>>>> one case. I have set http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/ >>>>>> detail? >>>>>> id=33 (this is SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser) to WontFix >>>>>> because I >>>>>> think this should not go into Pharo. Norbert, do you agree? >>>>>> >>>>> I wasn't sure myself as the mantis tickets are very unclear. It >>>>> seemed that 7075 introduced some bug which is reverted in >>>>> 7082. But it sounded to me as 7082 was more than just the >>>>> revert so I corporated the changes while leaving 7075 as >>>>> wontfix. >>>>> >>>>> I would agree. >>>>> >>>>> Norbert >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 5, 2008, at 01:05 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for >>>>>>> review: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat >>>>>>> SLICE-squeak7080 >>>>>>> SLICE-squeak7081 >>>>>>> SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser >>>>>>> SLICE-squeak7083 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SLICE-squeakUpdate7073 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is already in the updates and can be deleted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Norbert >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by Adrian Lienhard

Hi Stef, ok, I will do the next update. I will probably have time on Sunday or beginning of next week. Adrian On Jul 9, 2008, at 20:11 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi adrian > > did you create new scriptloader entries? > how do I sync with you? > Do you do the next update? It would be good this way we check for > real that > your password is working. > > Stef > > On Jul 9, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 18:19 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>> I moved all files related to this issue from the PharoInbox to >>> PharoInboxTreated. >>> Adrian >>> >> Great!!! Are you preparing a new update stream? >> >> Norbert >>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 17:54 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:04 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>>> I went through those changes and changed all to Verified except >>>>> for >>>>> one case. I have set http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail? >>>>> id=33 (this is SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser) to WontFix >>>>> because I >>>>> think this should not go into Pharo. Norbert, do you agree? >>>>> >>>> I wasn't sure myself as the mantis tickets are very unclear. It >>>> seemed that 7075 introduced some bug which is reverted in >>>> 7082. But it sounded to me as 7082 was more than just the >>>> revert so I corporated the changes while leaving 7075 as >>>> wontfix. >>>> >>>> I would agree. >>>> >>>> Norbert >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Adrian >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 5, 2008, at 01:05 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for >>>>>> review: >>>>>> >>>>>> SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat >>>>>> SLICE-squeak7080 >>>>>> SLICE-squeak7081 >>>>>> SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser >>>>>> SLICE-squeak7083 >>>>>> >>>>>> And >>>>>> >>>>>> SLICE-squeakUpdate7073 >>>>>> >>>>>> is already in the updates and can be deleted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Norbert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] UTF support in Linux

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jul 9, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Michael Rueger wrote: > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> I think that fixing encodings is also part of mike push. I just saw >> these changesets >> and may be we should open tickets to see if we want to have a look. >> But encodings is a hell. > > Started looking at it. > It is pretty scary in how many places raw characters are created > without honoring any encodings etc... > > big question is: should everything be bakcward compatible with > older, non-unicode supporting VMs? > Right now we check against slot 7 if there is unicode available in > the key event buffer, otherwise we go through the default encoder. My gut feeling would say no. Else we will have again patches over patches. But now we can be sensible to argument that you can have. Stef > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 10, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] UTF support in Linux

by Michael Rueger

StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > I think that fixing encodings is also part of mike push. I just saw > these changesets > and may be we should open tickets to see if we want to have a look. > But encodings is a hell. Started looking at it. It is pretty scary in how many places raw characters are created without honoring any encodings etc... big question is: should everything be bakcward compatible with older, non-unicode supporting VMs? Right now we check against slot 7 if there is unicode available in the key event buffer, otherwise we go through the default encoder. Michael

July 9, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] new slices

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi adrian did you create new scriptloader entries? how do I sync with you? Do you do the next update? It would be good this way we check for real that your password is working. Stef On Jul 9, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 18:19 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> I moved all files related to this issue from the PharoInbox to >> PharoInboxTreated. >> Adrian >> > Great!!! Are you preparing a new update stream? > > Norbert >> On Jul 9, 2008, at 17:54 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:04 +0300, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> I went through those changes and changed all to Verified except for >>>> one case. I have set http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail? >>>> id=33 (this is SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser) to WontFix >>>> because I >>>> think this should not go into Pharo. Norbert, do you agree? >>>> >>> I wasn't sure myself as the mantis tickets are very unclear. It >>> seemed that 7075 introduced some bug which is reverted in >>> 7082. But it sounded to me as 7082 was more than just the >>> revert so I corporated the changes while leaving 7075 as >>> wontfix. >>> >>> I would agree. >>> >>> Norbert >>>> Cheers, >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Jul 5, 2008, at 01:05 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>> >>>>> with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for >>>>> review: >>>>> >>>>> SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat >>>>> SLICE-squeak7080 >>>>> SLICE-squeak7081 >>>>> SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser >>>>> SLICE-squeak7083 >>>>> >>>>> And >>>>> >>>>> SLICE-squeakUpdate7073 >>>>> >>>>> is already in the updates and can be deleted. >>>>> >>>>> Norbert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 9, 2008