- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10092

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> - FullScreen refactoring by mike Roberts > - fixed a bug in PluggableListMorph>>basicKeyPress introduced in > 10087 by Matthew Fulmer > - improve SUnit history (removed PopUpMenu) > - Issue 235: 0007205: Monticello Snapshot Speedup via new > MethodReference ivar (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7205) by > Matthew Fulmer > > > Stef Matthew could you sign the agreement? Stef

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] DependencyBrowser

by bryce＠kampjes.demon.co.uk

Alexandre Bergel writes: > You should continue to produce your dev image. > I have seen a lot of people using it. Really. I'm using the dev image. Both for pharo and Squeak 3.10. Bryce

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] faster snapshotting

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> Hi matthew > > I'm checking your > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=235&colspec=ID%20Type%20Sta… > > "Adding the ivar 'category' to methodReference allows a 25% speedup in > Monticello snapshotting, after source caching. This capability is > exploited as of PackageInfo-Base-mtf.56" > > for 10092 now. > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=235&colspec=ID%20Type%20Sta… > > Several questions > > - I do not know what you mean by PackageInfo-Base-mtf.56? > Where is it? > Is this package uses your setter method category:? > > - why the category and category: methods are not in the *monticello > extension? > (There were in *monticello in 10091) > > - When I categorized them in *monticello I got problems or my > network is really gettiong slow. I checked and rebooted my network. Now it looks like going much faster. > > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Oct. 12, 2008

[Pharo-project] faster snapshotting

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi matthew I'm checking your http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=235&colspec=ID%20Type%20Sta… "Adding the ivar 'category' to methodReference allows a 25% speedup in Monticello snapshotting, after source caching. This capability is exploited as of PackageInfo-Base-mtf.56" for 10092 now. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=235&colspec=ID%20Type%20Sta… Several questions - I do not know what you mean by PackageInfo-Base-mtf.56? Where is it? Is this package uses your setter method category:? - why the category and category: methods are not in the *monticello extension? (There were in *monticello in 10091) - When I categorized them in *monticello I got problems or my network is really gettiong slow. Stef

Oct. 12, 2008

[Pharo-project] please do not use PopUpMenu but

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

but UIManager Tx

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] DependencyBrowser

by Tudor Girba

Those packages would be enough for me (in particular Shout and Omnibrowser). Cheers, Doru On Oct 12, 2008, at 5:32 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> > Just a point of explanation. > For pharo we want to have one image (one click) with all the dev > tools listed on the web-page of damien. > Then this image will be based on a core image and with tools > integrated (minimal number of class > extensions). > One of the reasons we asked damien not to do a specific pharo dev is > that a -dev image does not > provide enough garanty that the packages loaded together actually > works. > > So do you really need an image with more than > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages ? > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "It's not how it is, it is how we see it."

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo Harvesting Infrastructure

by Matthew Fulmer

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:24:16PM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: > for me this is the 15th but I'm cheating :) > I want the gifts before :)) Nice. me too. -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/

Oct. 12, 2008

[Pharo-project] I'm doing a small release to clean a bit the inbox

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] DependencyBrowser

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> Just a point of explanation. For pharo we want to have one image (one click) with all the dev tools listed on the web-page of damien. Then this image will be based on a core image and with tools integrated (minimal number of class extensions). One of the reasons we asked damien not to do a specific pharo dev is that a -dev image does not provide enough garanty that the packages loaded together actually works. So do you really need an image with more than http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages ? Stef

Oct. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo image size: 10.9MB

by Adrian Lienhard

Would it make sense then, to use Accujen as default? (Comparing the two, I actually also prefer Accujen compared to Accuny. I just chose the latter because it is currently the default code, menu, and list font) Adrian On Oct 12, 2008, at 15:55 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Yes! > > Stef > >>> no. But I don't think we need them anymore, especially if we have >>> FreeType >> >> You may want to keep Accujen for special situation (embedded system >> with ARM CPU) where freetype cannot be uses or is not appropriate. >> Accujen is pretty readable and comes with different sizes. >> Just some guess... >> >> Hilaire >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Oct. 12, 2008