- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Serge Stinckwich

2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch>: > ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo. +1 -- Serge Stinckwich IRD - UR 079 Geodes, MSI Team, Hanoi, Vietnam Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] http://doesnotunderstand.org/

Nov. 4, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Re: [Pkg] Installer: Installer-Core-AlexandreBergel.244.mcz

by Alexandre Bergel

Excellent David, Alexandre On 29 Oct 2008, at 17:38, David RÃ¶thlisberger wrote: > >>> Are you updating loadSuperOB? Or shall I do it? >> I'm just right now in the process of doing it. ;) > > There is ScriptLoader-DavidRoethlisberger.594 in PharoInbox > providing a working version of #loadSuperOB and also #loadOBAlpha, > which load the latest version of the default OB package browser, but > without Mondrian, visualizations, etc. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] OT: how much Smalltalk code is in Linux kernel

by Alexandre Bergel

Maybe some comment using "..." are present in the code that is ignored for some reason from the compiler. Cheers, Alexandre On 3 Nov 2008, at 19:16, Michael Roberts wrote: > -9 lines? did I read that right? > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] OT: how much Smalltalk code is in Linux kernel

by Michael Roberts

-9 lines? did I read that right? Mike

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Giovanni Corriga

Adrian Lienhard ha scritto: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:55 , Serge Stinckwich wrote: >> Why not Pharo-stable and Pharo-unstable ? > > because there exists a stable CORE too. Changes are done on the core and > from this the IDE is then built. > > I hope this helps to explain the rationale behind the suggested naming. > A non-Smalltalker who reads Pharo-IDE will assume this is the IDE only, and not the CORE+the dev tools. Why not something like Pharo-SDK? Giovanni

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Tudor Girba

Nov. 3, 2008

[Pharo-project] OT: how much Smalltalk code is in Linux kernel

by Pavel Krivanek

http://www.ohloh.net/projects/linux/analyses/latest

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Adrian Lienhard

ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo. Adrian On Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote: >> Marcus Denker wrote: >> >>> I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. >> >> +0.9 >> >> Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1) >> >> Michael > > Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad > either. > > Ramon Leon > http://onsmalltalk.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Nov. 3, 2008

RE: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Ramon Leon

> Marcus Denker wrote: > > > I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. > > +0.9 > > Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1) > > Michael Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad either. Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Re: Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Bill Schwab

Francois, Welcome to the list! +1 on the naming scheme. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com 11/03/08 9:56 AM >>> > During ESUG, we discussed about that with Marcus. IIRC, he wanted the > current pharo-dev (your Pharo-IDE) to be named just Pharo. The core, > which should only be used by people "knowing what they do" would be > named Pharo-core. I agree, in my humble opinion it seems to be the best choice. Francois ps: I'm new to the list. Keep the good work with pharo guys! _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Nov. 3, 2008