- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Add a new package with OB

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi David and others, I created a new package using the SuperOB browser. I added few classes in it. The package does not appear at the top of the package list. I was expecting my package to be listed under 'Recently Modified'. do I miss something? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 19, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Alexandre Bergel

It works now! Cheers, Alexandre On 18 Jan 2009, at 21:05, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2009, at 20:07 , Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>>> That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test >>>> methods >>>> (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two >>>> methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the >>>> issue >>>> 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not >>>> see how you change is related to this bug. >>> >>> Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 should *add* the two tests you mention >>> above. They document the problem and should run green after loading >>> the Kernel package and after executing the script. >> >> >> Sorry, I misread the merger. >> After having loaded Kernel-adrian_lienhard.252, testTraitsUsersSanity >> goes red (where testUsersWithClassChanges goes green). It seems that >> the following traits do not include their users: >> an IdentitySet(SetTest ArrayTest OrderedCollectionTest BagTest) >> >> Did I do something wrong? > > maybe you have not loaded the script I posted as a comment on > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 > > I'll add that in the change set of the update stream when I push this > out. > > Adrian > >> >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hope it helps, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to >>>>> some >>>>> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, >>>>> I'd >>>>> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits >>>>> still >>>>> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they >>>>> run >>>>> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >>>>> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail? >>>>> id=443 >>>>> Adrian >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's >>>>>> easy: >>>>>> >>>>>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>>>>> IdentitySet new ]. >>>>>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>>>>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: >>>>>> each >>>>>> traitComposition ] ]. >>>>>> >>>>>> This recreates all users sets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard >>>>>>> <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>>>>> years. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics >>>>>>> automatically >>>>>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically >>>>>>> generated). >>>>>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>>>> project >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>>> project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I will try to check but in this moment this is crazy (was sick still a bit and 2 paper deadline + one deliverable) On Jan 18, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2009, at 20:07 , Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>>> That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test >>>> methods >>>> (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two >>>> methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the >>>> issue >>>> 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not >>>> see how you change is related to this bug. >>> >>> Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 should *add* the two tests you mention >>> above. They document the problem and should run green after loading >>> the Kernel package and after executing the script. >> >> >> Sorry, I misread the merger. >> After having loaded Kernel-adrian_lienhard.252, testTraitsUsersSanity >> goes red (where testUsersWithClassChanges goes green). It seems that >> the following traits do not include their users: >> an IdentitySet(SetTest ArrayTest OrderedCollectionTest BagTest) >> >> Did I do something wrong? > > maybe you have not loaded the script I posted as a comment on > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 > > I'll add that in the change set of the update stream when I push this > out. > > Adrian > >> >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hope it helps, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to >>>>> some >>>>> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, >>>>> I'd >>>>> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits >>>>> still >>>>> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they >>>>> run >>>>> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >>>>> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail? >>>>> id=443 >>>>> Adrian >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's >>>>>> easy: >>>>>> >>>>>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>>>>> IdentitySet new ]. >>>>>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>>>>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: >>>>>> each >>>>>> traitComposition ] ]. >>>>>> >>>>>> This recreates all users sets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard >>>>>>> <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>>>>> years. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics >>>>>>> automatically >>>>>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically >>>>>>> generated). >>>>>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>>>> project >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>>> project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jan 18, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> I read the description of http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=246 >> , but I haven't seen this bug. (Object allSubclasses reject: >> #isMeta) select: [:cls | cls classVarNames ~= cls class >> classVarNames] >> is empty in my image > > In one of the comment, Marcus said this is fixed already. normally yes it was. I rely on the fix for moose extraction. > > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > >> >> >> Before your change, 87 out of 88 tests on traits are green. The only >> failing one is testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait. Are there some >> compiled method sharing still? Or each compiled method is copied? >> Same ratio of green tests after having loaded your change. >> >> That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test >> methods >> (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two >> methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the issue >> 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not >> see how you change is related to this bug. >> >> Hope it helps, >> Alexandre >> >> >> >> On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to >>> some >>> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, >>> I'd >>> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still >>> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they >>> run >>> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >>> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>> >>>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >>>> >>>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>>> IdentitySet new ]. >>>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >>>> traitComposition ] ]. >>>> >>>> This recreates all users sets. >>>> >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>>> years. >>>>> >>>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics >>>>> automatically >>>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically >>>>> generated). >>>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Adrian Lienhard

On Jan 18, 2009, at 20:07 , Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test >>> methods >>> (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two >>> methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the >>> issue >>> 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not >>> see how you change is related to this bug. >> >> Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 should *add* the two tests you mention >> above. They document the problem and should run green after loading >> the Kernel package and after executing the script. > > > Sorry, I misread the merger. > After having loaded Kernel-adrian_lienhard.252, testTraitsUsersSanity > goes red (where testUsersWithClassChanges goes green). It seems that > the following traits do not include their users: > an IdentitySet(SetTest ArrayTest OrderedCollectionTest BagTest) > > Did I do something wrong? maybe you have not loaded the script I posted as a comment on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 I'll add that in the change set of the update stream when I push this out. Adrian > > > Cheers, > Alexandre > >>> >>> >>> Hope it helps, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> >>> On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>> >>>> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to >>>> some >>>> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, >>>> I'd >>>> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits >>>> still >>>> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they >>>> run >>>> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >>>> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >>>>> >>>>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>>>> IdentitySet new ]. >>>>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>>>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >>>>> traitComposition ] ]. >>>>> >>>>> This recreates all users sets. >>>>> >>>>> Adrian >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard >>>>>> <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>>>> years. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics >>>>>> automatically >>>>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically >>>>>> generated). >>>>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>>> project >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Alexandre Bergel

>> That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test >> methods >> (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two >> methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the issue >> 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not >> see how you change is related to this bug. > > Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 should *add* the two tests you mention > above. They document the problem and should run green after loading > the Kernel package and after executing the script. Sorry, I misread the merger. After having loaded Kernel-adrian_lienhard.252, testTraitsUsersSanity goes red (where testUsersWithClassChanges goes green). It seems that the following traits do not include their users: an IdentitySet(SetTest ArrayTest OrderedCollectionTest BagTest) Did I do something wrong? Cheers, Alexandre >> >> >> Hope it helps, >> Alexandre >> >> >> >> On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to >>> some >>> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, >>> I'd >>> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still >>> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they >>> run >>> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >>> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>> >>>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >>>> >>>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>>> IdentitySet new ]. >>>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >>>> traitComposition ] ]. >>>> >>>> This recreates all users sets. >>>> >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>>> years. >>>>> >>>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics >>>>> automatically >>>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically >>>>> generated). >>>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Damien Cassou >>>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Adrian Lienhard

Hi Alex Thanks for taking a look. On Jan 18, 2009, at 19:14 , Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I went through your changes: > - You new version of ClassBuilder>>validateClassvars:from:forSuper: > makes fully sense to me, class variables of metaclasses should not > matter. It is right to do (oldClass allSubclasses reject: #isMeta). I > read the description of http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=246 > , but I haven't seen this bug. (Object allSubclasses reject: > #isMeta) select: [:cls | cls classVarNames ~= cls class classVarNames] > is empty in my image This issue, which I fixed with the change you mention above, is not related to traits but I needed to fix it because else I could not load my fixes back into an image as ClassBuilder was broken in the edge case of the class Behavior. The issue is that it checks whether there exists no subclass of the class to be changed (in this case Behavior) that has the same classVarNames. Now in the case of Behavior, its metaclass, Behavior class, *is* a subclass of Behavior. With the change introduced by #246, Metaclasses answer to #classVarNames, leading to a false warning in ClassBuilder. > Before your change, 87 out of 88 tests on traits are green. The only > failing one is testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait. Are there some > compiled method sharing still? Or each compiled method is copied? This is unrelated to sharing compiled methods. This test simply checks whether there exists a method in a class that has the same implementation as a method that would be obtained from a trait this class uses. Hence, this points out issues with clients of traits, not with the traits implementation. > Same ratio of green tests after having loaded your change. > > That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test methods > (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two > methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the issue > 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not > see how you change is related to this bug. Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 should *add* the two tests you mention above. They document the problem and should run green after loading the Kernel package and after executing the script. Adrian > > > Hope it helps, > Alexandre > > > > On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to some >> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, I'd >> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still >> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they run >> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 >> Adrian >> >> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >>> >>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>> IdentitySet new ]. >>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >>> traitComposition ] ]. >>> >>> This recreates all users sets. >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>> wrote: >>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>> years. >>>> >>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics automatically >>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically generated). >>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Damien Cassou >>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Alexandre Bergel

> I read the description of http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=246 > , but I haven't seen this bug. (Object allSubclasses reject: > #isMeta) select: [:cls | cls classVarNames ~= cls class classVarNames] > is empty in my image In one of the comment, Marcus said this is fixed already. Cheers, Alexandre > > > Before your change, 87 out of 88 tests on traits are green. The only > failing one is testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait. Are there some > compiled method sharing still? Or each compiled method is copied? > Same ratio of green tests after having loaded your change. > > That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test methods > (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two > methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the issue > 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not > see how you change is related to this bug. > > Hope it helps, > Alexandre > > > > On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to some >> implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, I'd >> appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still >> work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they run >> green now (with the other 80 traits tests). >> For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 >> Adrian >> >> On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >>> >>> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >>> IdentitySet new ]. >>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >>> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >>> traitComposition ] ]. >>> >>> This recreates all users sets. >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>>> wrote: >>>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>>> years. >>>> >>>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics automatically >>>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically generated). >>>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Damien Cassou >>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi Adrian, I went through your changes: - You new version of ClassBuilder>>validateClassvars:from:forSuper: makes fully sense to me, class variables of metaclasses should not matter. It is right to do (oldClass allSubclasses reject: #isMeta). I read the description of http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=246 , but I haven't seen this bug. (Object allSubclasses reject: #isMeta) select: [:cls | cls classVarNames ~= cls class classVarNames] is empty in my image Before your change, 87 out of 88 tests on traits are green. The only failing one is testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait. Are there some compiled method sharing still? Or each compiled method is copied? Same ratio of green tests after having loaded your change. That strange, Traits-adrian_lienhard.258 removes only two test methods (testTraitsUsersSanity and testUsersWithClassChanges). These two methods do not exist in my image. The comment said this fix the issue 443 (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443) I do not see how you change is related to this bug. Hope it helps, Alexandre On 18 Jan 2009, at 18:27, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to some > implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, I'd > appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still > work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they run > green now (with the other 80 traits tests). > For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 > Adrian > > On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: >> >> Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: >> IdentitySet new ]. >> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | >> each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each >> traitComposition ] ]. >> >> This recreates all users sets. >> >> Adrian >> >> On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >>> wrote: >>>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>>> years. >>> >>> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics automatically >>> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically generated). >>> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >>> >>> -- >>> Damien Cassou >>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Big problem with the implementation of traits

by Adrian Lienhard

I've published a fix to the inbox. Since the bug was related to some implementation details of the ClassBuilder and hence non-trivial, I'd appreciate if somebody could try it out and verify that traits still work as expected. I've added tests that document the bug and they run green now (with the other 80 traits tests). For details see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443 Adrian On Jan 17, 2009, at 15:29 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Well, if you just want to make your numbers be right, that's easy: > > Smalltalk allTraits do: [ :each | each instVarNamed: 'users' put: > IdentitySet new ]. > Smalltalk allClassesAndTraits do: [ :each | > each hasTraitComposition ifTrue: [ each setTraitComposition: each > traitComposition ] ]. > > This recreates all users sets. > > Adrian > > On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:20 , Damien Cassou wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >> wrote: >>> BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four >>> years. >> >> We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics automatically >> calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically generated). >> Since the article and the metrics are about trait users... >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Jan. 18, 2009