- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] about the closure

by Michael Roberts

Ok cool. Good stuff! Mike On 3/31/09, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Attached is a third set of tests, those where written by >> Rob Wither and Boris Gaertner years ago. >> >> And: they don't file in. I think because Eliot's compiler does not >> support shadowing of variables in some cases. But I did not look to >> deeply. > > I fixed the loading, see attachement. The tests all pass :-) > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >

March 31, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about the closure

by Lukas Renggli

> Attached is a third set of tests, those where written by > Rob Wither and Boris Gaertner years ago. > > And: they don't file in. I think because Eliot's compiler does not > support shadowing of variables in some cases. But I did not look to > deeply. I fixed the loading, see attachement. The tests all pass :-) Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

March 31, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about the closure

by Marcus Denker

Hi, Very cool! Attached is a third set of tests, those where written by Rob Wither and Boris Gaertner years ago. And: they don't file in. I think because Eliot's compiler does not support shadowing of variables in some cases. But I did not look to deeply. On 30.03.2009, at 23:40, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Eliots code comes with additional tests. > > Furthermore I wrote an set of tests (see attachement). These tests > especially make sure that none of the optimizations destroy the > closure behavior. All existing Smalltalk implementations have some > bugs, even the commercial ones. > > Another test is that the image can be completely recompiled and no > additional test fails. > > Then the Seaside tests are another good candidate, they depend heavily > on block behavior. And continuations extensively stress the context > implementation. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > <ClosureTests.st>_______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Marcus Denker -- denker(a)acm.org http://www.marcusdenker.de

March 31, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo tentative schedule roadmap ....

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

probably We will harvest the closures and we will have to think what we want to do. If you and other want to help the tests should be green and stop popping up dialog boxes Stef On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Geert wrote: > > I assume the tentative (March Beta and May release) schedule on the > Pharo Project website may need some minor adjustments? > -- > View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-tentative-schedule-roadmap-....-tp2560092p256009… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 31, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about the closure

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I really want to see that :) Because the semantics of Smalltalk block is far from clear to me. Do you write something on it :)? for DSL? for ESUG workshop? Stef On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:20 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >> Furthermore I wrote an set of tests (see attachement). These tests >> especially make sure that none of the optimizations destroy the >> closure behavior. All existing Smalltalk implementations have some >> bugs, even the commercial ones. > > I should note that these tests were written after a long discussion > with Oscar on the exact ANSI Smalltalk block semantics. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 31, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Exupery VM crashed with SegFault

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > try to evaluate the following code in any Pharo image using the > Exupery Unix VM and you will get a Segmentation Fault. > > Preferences setMenuFontTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'DejaVu Serif' > pointSize: 10). > > $ squeak -version > 3.10-3 #29 Fri Feb 27 22:09:30 GMT 2009 gcc 4.1.2 > Pharo0.1 of 16 May 2008 [latest update: #10074] > Linux localhost 2.6.24.4 #9 SMP Sat Jul 19 21:31:15 BST 2008 i686 > Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6850 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux > default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.10-3/*.so > > Segmentation fault > > 2025578964 UUID>initialize > 2025578848 Behavior>new: > 2025578756 >new > 2025578664 >setTimeStamp > 2025578480 >updateInstances > 2025560892 >setMenuFontTo: > [...] > > The code which crashes: > > UUID>>initialize > self primMakeUUID. > > UUID>>primMakeUUID > <primitive: 'primitiveMakeUUID' module: 'UUIDPlugin'> > UUIDGenerator default generateBytes: self forVersion: 4. > > If I remove the call to the primitive, things works and the font is > changed. > It works for me on Ubuntu hardy, exupery and pharo 262. Cheers, Mariano > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 30, 2009

[Pharo-project] Pharo tentative schedule roadmap ....

by Geert

I assume the tentative (March Beta and May release) schedule on the Pharo Project website may need some minor adjustments? -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-tentative-schedule-roadmap-....-tp2560092p256009… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 30, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about the closure

by Lukas Renggli

> Furthermore I wrote an set of tests (see attachement). These tests > especially make sure that none of the optimizations destroy the > closure behavior. All existing Smalltalk implementations have some > bugs, even the commercial ones. I should note that these tests were written after a long discussion with Oscar on the exact ANSI Smalltalk block semantics. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

March 30, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue #684 Recent Morphic Changesets

by Rob Rothwell

Does the actual change set help? If so...here it is. Also, the only other things I have submitted have been the update button for the fonts, and that removal of Display-something-or-other for Michael... If the mail doesn't get there, let me know and I'll try again! Rob On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:54 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > ok excellent > I'm doing it right now > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > > > HaloMorphRefactoring was the changeset from Gary (which you > > mentioned in mail 17.3 you'd integrate ;) ), so shouldn't need any > > licence from Rob. > > He also mentioned PluggableTextMorph was a .cs from some while back > > (I don't remember from whom it came). > > > > And yes, I'll check if the update will remove the BorderedMorph > > areasRemainingToFill: completely :) > > > > Cheers, > > Henry > > > > On 30.03.2009 22:48, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi rob > >> > >> did you sign the license agreement? > >> If not please do it > >> Thanks > >> > >> Stef > >> On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I got tired of filing in HaloMorphRefactoring and > >>> PluggableTextMorph- > >>> scrollSelectionIntoView with every new update, so I published a > >>> Morphic package Morphic-rob_rothwell.290 in the inbox with these > >>> changes after upgrading to version 10259. > >>> > >>> Just fixes the non-transparent HaloMorph and non-scrolling edit > >>> window when selecting text. > >>> > >>> Take care, > >>> > >>> Rob > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pharo-project mailing list > >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 30, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue #684 Recent Morphic Changesets

by Rob Rothwell

Yes...but I can't find my email saying when I put it in the mail! I remember it cost less than a dollar, though, to send something all the way across the ocean! Rob On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > Hi rob > > did you sign the license agreement? > If not please do it > Thanks > > Stef > On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I got tired of filing in HaloMorphRefactoring and PluggableTextMorph- > > scrollSelectionIntoView with every new update, so I published a > > Morphic package Morphic-rob_rothwell.290 in the inbox with these > > changes after upgrading to version 10259. > > > > Just fixes the non-transparent HaloMorph and non-scrolling edit > > window when selecting text. > > > > Take care, > > > > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 30, 2009