- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] :) New Neil Young

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Fork in the Road :) Stef

April 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [on] status of split join in pharo

by Oscar Nierstrasz

Hi Stef, The fix is simple. BlockContext>>split: should be copied to BlockClosure>>split: Cheers, - on On Apr 13, 2009, at 15:21, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi oscar > > I integrated the lastest version on pharo 10271 but I do not > understand since I have two tests that failed. > Is it normal? > Can you have a look? > > Stef > > On Apr 12, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> I have attempted to merge the functionality of Keith's Join package >> and Damien's and my RubyShards. >> >> The protocol is basically Keith's. >> >> Send splitOn: to a collection to split it, or send split: to the >> splitter with the collection as argument. >> >> The reverse messages are joinUsing: and join:. >> >> Everything has been generalized to work not only with Arrays and >> Strings but also OrderedCollections and SortedCollections. Not only >> sequences and blocks can be used as splitters, but also objects and >> regexes. >> >> Documentation is in SplitJoinTest on the class side, or see the class >> comment. >> >> See http://www.squeaksource.com/SplitJoin.html >> >> The latest version has been pushed into the PharoInbox. >> >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [on] status of split join in pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

you take the latest image (not dev) and do update. stef On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > I can look. All tests should be green. > > Where do I look find it? > > It is not here: > > http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=1299 > > - on > > On Apr 13, 2009, at 15:21, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi oscar >> >> I integrated the lastest version on pharo 10271 but I do not >> understand since I have two tests that failed. >> Is it normal? >> Can you have a look? >> >> Stef >> >> On Apr 12, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> I have attempted to merge the functionality of Keith's Join package >>> and Damien's and my RubyShards. >>> >>> The protocol is basically Keith's. >>> >>> Send splitOn: to a collection to split it, or send split: to the >>> splitter with the collection as argument. >>> >>> The reverse messages are joinUsing: and join:. >>> >>> Everything has been generalized to work not only with Arrays and >>> Strings but also OrderedCollections and SortedCollections. Not only >>> sequences and blocks can be used as splitters, but also objects and >>> regexes. >>> >>> Documentation is in SplitJoinTest on the class side, or see the >>> class >>> comment. >>> >>> See http://www.squeaksource.com/SplitJoin.html >>> >>> The latest version has been pushed into the PharoInbox. >>> >>> - on >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [on] status of split join in pharo

by Oscar Nierstrasz

I can look. All tests should be green. Where do I look find it? It is not here: http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=1299 - on On Apr 13, 2009, at 15:21, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi oscar > > I integrated the lastest version on pharo 10271 but I do not > understand since I have two tests that failed. > Is it normal? > Can you have a look? > > Stef > > On Apr 12, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> I have attempted to merge the functionality of Keith's Join package >> and Damien's and my RubyShards. >> >> The protocol is basically Keith's. >> >> Send splitOn: to a collection to split it, or send split: to the >> splitter with the collection as argument. >> >> The reverse messages are joinUsing: and join:. >> >> Everything has been generalized to work not only with Arrays and >> Strings but also OrderedCollections and SortedCollections. Not only >> sequences and blocks can be used as splitters, but also objects and >> regexes. >> >> Documentation is in SplitJoinTest on the class side, or see the class >> comment. >> >> See http://www.squeaksource.com/SplitJoin.html >> >> The latest version has been pushed into the PharoInbox. >> >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10271

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

'- ArrayTest green after closure revertion. - Issue 712: Added PackageInfo class>>existPackageNamed: - Issue 733: integrate splitJoin: - Issue 734: deprecating some text method after unicode'. - 566: atRandom ... stef

April 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] *overrides* in polymorph

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi gary It seems that I already fixed SystemProgressMorph>>label:min:max: so that the bloack argument is not written. Can you check because if I redo it and it gets overridden I will have the smae problem. stef

April 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [on] status of split join in pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi oscar I integrated the lastest version on pharo 10271 but I do not understand since I have two tests that failed. Is it normal? Can you have a look? Stef On Apr 12, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > I have attempted to merge the functionality of Keith's Join package > and Damien's and my RubyShards. > > The protocol is basically Keith's. > > Send splitOn: to a collection to split it, or send split: to the > splitter with the collection as argument. > > The reverse messages are joinUsing: and join:. > > Everything has been generalized to work not only with Arrays and > Strings but also OrderedCollections and SortedCollections. Not only > sequences and blocks can be used as splitters, but also objects and > regexes. > > Documentation is in SplitJoinTest on the class side, or see the class > comment. > > See http://www.squeaksource.com/SplitJoin.html > > The latest version has been pushed into the PharoInbox. > > - on > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] 10270

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> - Issue 730 SUnitGui > - do not consider package declarations from superclasses > - filter the package declaration from the coverage set > - added the method TestCase>>#packageNamesUnderTest that can be > overridden in TestCase sub-classes to let the test runner > automatically know what code to instrument > - Issue 519: Can't pass a script to the VM > - Issue 731 Scriptloader add FFI loading as convenience method for > easy loading > - Issue 622: there is a deprecated method call when using the method > finder > - Issue 732 numberOfDigits > - Issue 728: isLiteralSymbol broken by closure merge > > > Please check that everything is ok. > Thanks > > Stef And MonticelloGUI also integrated

April 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [on] why can't I write on a WriteStream on an OrderedCollection?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=729 On Apr 12, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > While I believe Nile is certainly a valuable work, it is very easy to > patch old stream for this particular bug in the interim. > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=2390 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7269 > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7296 > > Nicolas

April 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] I will do an update now...

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

April 13, 2009