- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue Fixing Process

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

oh yesssss! Stef On Jun 13, 2009, at 2:29 PM, dmason(a)mason-rose.ca wrote: >> As a start point I will run the test cases and see if I can fix the >> failing... (Issue 409). > > I would encourage anyone fixing an issue to first add a test case that > exhibits the issue to the appropriate test class, and *then* see if > you > can fix the issue itself. > > Even if you can't fix the issue, *publish the test case*(s). This > will > allow someone else to move forward faster on fixing it. > > ../Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about FLoatArrays isZero

by Michael Roberts

I haven't yet looked at the cs on the mantis report, but why do we expect to be able to coerce a collection into a number? (non an obvious behaviour for collections) thanks, Mike On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Nicolas Cellier<nicolas.cellier.aka.nice(a)gmail.com> wrote: > (a - b) allSatisfy: [:each | each isZero] ? > > 2009/6/13 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: >> isZero on collection does not make sense so it was deprecated now >> >> some tests like are breaking >> >> Â Â Â Â 3.0 / (FloatArray with: 2.0) = (FloatArray with: 1.5) >> >> so ? >> Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10334

by Michael Roberts

hi folks, just wanted to ask what the correct way we should expect deprecations to be used. Updates are great of course! I am running all the tests to generate baseline results and then try and chip away at a few of the new/old errors. However, now when I run the whole test suite it pauses because there is a deprecation. If we are going to deprecate a method would it be good to also fix up the senders? or have a mechanism that suppresses the deprecation in the context of the test run? thanks, Mike On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Denker<denker(a)acm.org> wrote: > #10334 > ====== > Issue 877: Â Â Â Collection>>isZero use deprecatedDescrition: instead of > deprecated > Issue 686: Â Â Â Remove dice methods in Random > Issue 631: Â Â Â API Consistency on MIMEDocument > > -- > Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de > PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] about FLoatArrays isZero

by Nicolas Cellier

(a - b) allSatisfy: [:each | each isZero] ? 2009/6/13 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > isZero on collection does not make sense so it was deprecated now > > some tests like are breaking > > 3.0 / (FloatArray with: 2.0) = (FloatArray with: 1.5) > > so ? > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] [update] #10338

by Marcus Denker

#10338 ====== Issue 66: 7116 setHeadingFix-wiz-1 -- Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

June 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue Fixing Process

by dmason＠mason-rose.ca

> As a start point I will run the test cases and see if I can fix the > failing... (Issue 409). I would encourage anyone fixing an issue to first add a test case that exhibits the issue to the appropriate test class, and *then* see if you can fix the issue itself. Even if you can't fix the issue, *publish the test case*(s). This will allow someone else to move forward faster on fixing it. ../Dave

June 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] Issue 66 fixed

by Norbert Hartl

Hi, I'be fixed Issue 66. It was basically renaming of test methods from ...test to test... This activated new tests that were there but hidden :) It is in PharoInbox Tests-Bugs-norbert_hartl.2 Norbert

June 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] about FLoatArrays isZero

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

isZero on collection does not make sense so it was deprecated now some tests like are breaking 3.0 / (FloatArray with: 2.0) = (FloatArray with: 1.5) so ? Stef

June 13, 2009

[Pharo-project] Issue 67 and CrLfFileStream

by Norbert Hartl

I've fixed issue 67. SLICE is in PharoInbox. While looking at the classes I found some things. CrLfFileStream is somehow obsolete. Its new class method creates a MultiByteFileStream. The code in both classes is doubled. I didn't check but I would expect it is close to all of the code. This is again a question if we are willing to break back- ward compatibility. I would opt for removing the class completely. If not I would change MultiByteFileStream in a way that it inherits from CrLfFileStream. This way we could at least remove the doubled code/methods. Or does anybody know reasons why the one or other isn't feasible to do? Furthermore I would remove the handling of line endings with symbols. These could just be the strings they contain. String cr, String lf and String crlf all exist. Using this instead of the symbols we could remove half of the class variables and get rid of the LineEndStrings dictionary. What do you think? And could someone please review my changes. I don't have a Mac. Well, the difference is only noticable if you have a system < 10. Norbert

June 13, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] MouseOverHandler refactoring

by Adrian Lienhard

On Jun 13, 2009, at 01:59 , Hernan Wilkinson wrote: > ups! you are write!! sorry about that, I realize I did not put the > name of > the file :-)The file name is: Morphic-HernanWilkinson.327.mcz > > About the issue tracker, the error that Stef point me to is > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=86 in his mail > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-June/009517.html > but > the description does not macth with the error I also fix. > Do you think I should open a new defect? Yes, I think that would be best. Cheers, Adrian > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> > wrote: > >> Hi Hernan, >> >> On Jun 12, 2009, at 21:55 , Hernan Wilkinson wrote: >> >>> I uploaded to the pharo inbox repository... is that right? >> >> Yes. But additionally it would be good to note which file(s) you >> uploaded in the issue tracker. Like this we can track changes. If no >> report exists yet, just create a new one. >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian >> >>> The only way to >>> test it that I found of is just to install it and play with the >>> mouse... if >>> you do not have a debugger, it means it is working :-) >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> 2009/6/12 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson(a)gmail.com>: >>>>> Hope you like it. >>>> >>>> Where can we find it? >>>> How to test it? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Damien Cassou >>>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>>> >>>> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >>>> popular by not having them." James Iry >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 13, 2009