- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Glorp now load easily in Pharo

by Michael Atkisson

Mariano, Just following these instructions doesn't work for me. I get an unknown selector error. Are there some missing steps? Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > Hi: I created the packages GlorpPharoPort and GlorpPharoLoader in > SqueakSource. > > In GlorpPharoPort we will put all the changes (to the current packages of > Glorp in squeaksource) o new stuff that is required for Glorp to work in > Pharo but that is Glorp related. Notice this port is based in the Squeak > port, not VW directly... > > So, to load Glorp in Pharo, take a Pharo image and evaluate this: > > |instClass| > instClass := Smalltalk at: #Installer ifAbsent: [ScriptLoader > loadLatestPackage: 'Installer-Core' fromSqueaksource: 'Installer'. > Smalltalk > at: #Installer]. > instClass ss project: 'Glorp'; install: 'GlorpPharoLoader'. > (Smalltalk at: #GlorpPharoLoader) loadGlorp. > > This also works with latests images where the Eliot closures are > integrated. > > The important thing here is that Pharo doesn't support underscore in > selectors. So, it is installed the workarround that is here: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=826 > > We hope someone really fix this so that no to use the workarround. > > Cheers, > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/-ANN--Glorp-now-load-easily-in-Pharo-tp3056236p3149799… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 24, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] 10343

by Rob Rothwell

Sure...I just downloaded 10342 for good measure, opened it up, opened a Workspace, and watched OCompletion work while typing "Morph new openInWorld." Then I ran the system updates to 10343, and it did not work anymore. Should I log an issue? Rob 2009/6/24 Romain Robbes <romain.robbes(a)lu.unisi.ch> > Rob, can you confirm this? > Romain > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > > Looks like maybe OCompletion quit working in a Workspace with this update? > > Rob > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> wrote: > >> Final license cleaning... >> >> - Network-Url-GabrielOmarCotelli.7 >> HTTPUrl>>retrieveContentArgs: >> - Morphic-GabrielOmarCotelli.326 >> TransformMorph >> numberOfItemsPotentiallyInViewWith: >> PluggableListMorph >> numSelectionsInView >> WorldState class >> deferredExecutionTimeLimit >> WorldState >> runStepMethodsIn: >> - Cleaning of PMM methods >> Object >> isTrait >> Set class >> rehashAllSets >> Set class >> new >> CodeLoader class >> exportCodeSegment:classes:keepSource: >> FloatTest >> testInfinity3 (deleted) >> FloatTest >> testZero2 (deleted) >> >> >> This should make Pharo MIT license clean. Will do an audit to be sure >> tomorrow. >> >> Adrian >> ___________________ >> http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > <ATT00001.txt> > > > -- > Romain Robbes > http://www.inf.unisi.ch/phd/robbes > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 24, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] 10343

by Romain Robbes

Rob, can you confirm this? Romain On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > Looks like maybe OCompletion quit working in a Workspace with this > update? > > Rob > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> > wrote: > Final license cleaning... > > - Network-Url-GabrielOmarCotelli.7 > HTTPUrl>>retrieveContentArgs: > - Morphic-GabrielOmarCotelli.326 > TransformMorph >> numberOfItemsPotentiallyInViewWith: > PluggableListMorph >> numSelectionsInView > WorldState class >> deferredExecutionTimeLimit > WorldState >> runStepMethodsIn: > - Cleaning of PMM methods > Object >> isTrait > Set class >> rehashAllSets > Set class >> new > CodeLoader class >> exportCodeSegment:classes:keepSource: > FloatTest >> testInfinity3 (deleted) > FloatTest >> testZero2 (deleted) > > > This should make Pharo MIT license clean. Will do an audit to be sure > tomorrow. > > Adrian > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > <ATT00001.txt> -- Romain Robbes http://www.inf.unisi.ch/phd/robbes

June 24, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Closing NewInspector

by Frederic Pluquet

It's done in the last version: No warning message appears (I think it's the best idea). FrÃ©d ---- FrÃ©dÃ©ric Pluquet UniversitÃ© Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Assistant http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/fpluquet 2009/6/23 Alexandre Bergel <Alexandre.Bergel(a)inria.fr> > Hi Frederic and others, > > Would it be possible to remove the warning message when closing a new > inspector? Maybe you could add an history of what you type if one is really > afraid of loosing text. > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > >

June 24, 2009

[Pharo-project] Closing NewInspector

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi Frederic and others, Would it be possible to remove the warning message when closing a new inspector? Maybe you could add an history of what you type if one is really afraid of loosing text. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

June 23, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

removing etoy cleaning morphic removing MVC is also boring and we nearly finished it. Stef On Jun 23, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Janko MivÅ¡ek wrote: > Congratulations to all who worked on that massive amount of boring but > important work. > > I see that as a signal that Pharo community can indeed achieve > something. I mean, if you are able to organize and complete such a > boring work in these times, when everyone wants to do only the exiting > things, you have an organization which is able to deliver! > > Best regards > Janko > > Adrian Lienhard pravi: > >> With the latest update, #10343, we have reached an important step >> towards Pharo 1.0. There is no method left in Pharo-core that is not >> license clean [1]. Methods from people that did not sign the >> agreement >> or did not release their code under SqueakL were removed or >> rewritten. >> There is a wiki page that describes how I did the audit [2]. >> >> Thanks to Gabriel for his help. >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing >> [2] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort >> ___________________ >> http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > -- > Janko MivÅ¡ek > AIDA/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 23, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Missing info in the change log

by Mariano Martinez Peck

This problem has also been reported in squeak today. See this ticket: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7354 Cheers, Mariano On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > we realized (after pharo crash) that there are some code changes > > > that are not save to the changes file. Most of the are related to > > > dynamically defining the "change". > > > > Yes some are missing and the class definition in cs would be really > > welcomed because doit for classdef is annoying. > > > > I agree, but it has one downsize. Juan Manuel did that on Cuis, but > > then you can not port code from it to Pharo/Squeak. > > Of course the answer could be "who cares", but just raising an > > issue. Maybe having an option to turn on/off would be better until > > all use the same format.. > > I know I checked Cuis. > I think that this is should be done so that we can load code > from pharo in other smalltalk. > > In general we should clean or rewrite the fileout code. > > > > jeje, I'll see if I can help. > > I would suggest to think in terms of a complete new project to fileout > code > because when I see that code I often waht to run away. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 23, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean

by Janko MivÅ¡ek

Congratulations to all who worked on that massive amount of boring but important work. I see that as a signal that Pharo community can indeed achieve something. I mean, if you are able to organize and complete such a boring work in these times, when everyone wants to do only the exiting things, you have an organization which is able to deliver! Best regards Janko Adrian Lienhard pravi: > With the latest update, #10343, we have reached an important step > towards Pharo 1.0. There is no method left in Pharo-core that is not > license clean [1]. Methods from people that did not sign the agreement > or did not release their code under SqueakL were removed or rewritten. > There is a wiki page that describes how I did the audit [2]. > > Thanks to Gabriel for his help. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing > [2] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ -- Janko MivÅ¡ek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si

June 23, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean

by Alexandre Bergel

Indeed, excellent ! Good job! Alexandre On 23 Jun 2009, at 09:53, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Adrian Lienhard<adi(a)netstyle.ch> > wrote: >> With the latest update, #10343, we have reached an important step >> towards Pharo 1.0. There is no method left in Pharo-core that is not >> license clean [1]. Methods from people that did not sign the >> agreement >> or did not release their code under SqueakL were removed or >> rewritten. >> There is a wiki page that describes how I did the audit [2]. > > Very very cool. Thank you all > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

June 23, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean

by Damien Cassou

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Adrian Lienhard<adi(a)netstyle.ch> wrote: > With the latest update, #10343, we have reached an important step > towards Pharo 1.0. There is no method left in Pharo-core that is not > license clean [1]. Methods from people that did not sign the agreement > or did not release their code under SqueakL were removed or rewritten. > There is a wiki page that describes how I did the audit [2]. Very very cool. Thank you all -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

June 23, 2009