- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] different behavior between Dictionary and MethodDictionary for #add:

by Cyrille Delaunay

2009/6/29 Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com> > Same problem with #removeKey:ifAbsent that doesn't return anything for > MethodDictionary ( instead of the value of association removed). > > 2009/6/29 Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com> > > Hi, >> I'm trying to test all subclasses of Dictionary and I just find a specific >> behavior for MethodDictionary : >> >> -> #add: return the association that has been added except for >> SmallDictionary for which #add: return the value of the association. >> > *this is for MethodDictionary and not SmallDictionary > >> Is there a reason for such an implementaion? >> > >

June 29, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] different behavior between Dictionary and MethodDictionary for #add:

by Cyrille Delaunay

Same problem with #removeKey:ifAbsent that doesn't return anything for MethodDictionary ( instead of the value of association removed). 2009/6/29 Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com> > Hi, > I'm trying to test all subclasses of Dictionary and I just find a specific > behavior for MethodDictionary : > > -> #add: return the association that has been added except for > SmallDictionary for which #add: return the value of the association. > > Is there a reason for such an implementaion? >

June 29, 2009

[Pharo-project] different behavior between Dictionary and MethodDictionary for #add:

by Cyrille Delaunay

Hi, I'm trying to test all subclasses of Dictionary and I just find a specific behavior for MethodDictionary : -> #add: return the association that has been added except for SmallDictionary for which #add: return the value of the association. Is there a reason for such an implementaion?

June 29, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 10344

by Alain Plantec

StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > super initialize second part > Thanks alain. > fortunately you reviewed what I did, so thanks to you Steph. ;-) Alain > > Stef > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > >

June 29, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] update to OCompletion

by Steve Hayes

Thanks all - easily done with your help. I am using the 2.8.4 Seaside image. Steve On 28/06/2009, at 4:18 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Yes. The other option is to always evaluate something like this: > > |instClass| > instClass := Smalltalk at: #Installer ifAbsent: [ScriptLoader > loadLatestPackage: 'Installer-Core' fromSqueaksource: 'Installer'. > Smalltalk at: #Installer]. > instClass ss project: 'OCompletion'; install: 'OCLoader'. > > I think is piece of code is self explained. If not, just ask. > > Cheers, > > Mariano > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > > wrote: > steve which image are you using? > > You have to install the Installer you can do it that way > ScriptLoader new installingInstaller (bad name I should > change it to > installInstaller). > > Stef > > On Jun 27, 2009, at 4:53 AM, Steve Hayes wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I'm a complete novice at Pharo. When I try to "do" that > > code fragment I get "Unknown variable: Installer". Can someone > tell me > > what I'm doing wrong? > > > > On 26/06/2009, at 11:58 PM, Romain Robbes wrote: > > > >> Dear Pharo users, > >> > >> I fixed a few things in OCompletion: > >> > >> -When completing class names, performance should be improved when > >> scrolling the list of possibilities. > >> -Pressing tab when there are no matches in the cache of recently > used > >> entries will bring up the normal completion menu. > >> -Fixed issue when on rare occasions the selected item in the menu > >> would be out of sync with the entries and cause a walkback. > >> > >> As always, OCompletion is available at: > >> > >> Installer squeaksource project: 'OCompletion'; install: 'OCLoader' > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Romain > >> -- > >> Romain Robbes > >> http://www.inf.unisi.ch/phd/robbes > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project ----- Steve Hayes Cogent Consulting http://www.cogentconsulting.com.au http://iridescenturchin.wordpress.com/ twitter: steve_hayes Mobile: 0403 902 431

June 29, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] open solaris x86

by Damien Cassou

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Carlos Crosetti<carlos(a)mostar.com.ar> wrote: > Hi, is there a vm build for open solaris x86? I don't think so. If you build one, please tell me and I will add it to the website. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

June 29, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] update to OCompletion

by Damien Cassou

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Steve Hayes<steve.hayes(a)cogentconsulting.com.au> wrote: > I'm sorry, I'm a complete novice at Pharo. When I try to "do" that > code fragment I get "Unknown variable: Installer". Can someone tell me > what I'm doing wrong? OCompletion is already included in Pharo images: http://pharo-project.org/download -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

June 29, 2009

[Pharo-project] open solaris x86

by Carlos Crosetti

Hi, is there a vm build for open solaris x86? Regards, Carlos

June 29, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10344

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

super initialize second part Thanks alain. Stef

June 28, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] The future of Squeak & Pharo

by Janko MivÅ¡ek

Bert Freudenberg pravi: > Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> At this point, I'd be leaning back towards squeak central >> reintegrating Pharo, >> given that Etoys already forked. > Even disregarding what the Pharo people would think about the idea, > doesn't that argument go both ways? As in "given that Pharo already > forked, Etoys can now be reintegrated to Squeak"? Hardly. Pharo deals with lower levels than EToys, EToys works in top of that core, being Pharo or Squeak. That's why I see Randal's suggestion reasonable and a nice refinement of GÃ¶ran's original "merge" idea. Then one should just adjust EToys on top, or I'm too naive and don't see some technical problem here? Best regards Janko -- Janko MivÅ¡ek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si

June 28, 2009