- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] What is the story for fasterSets

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys what is the conclusion for the faster sets? Stef

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] macintosh clipboard and images

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

John I do not have the technical background to reply but pharo is interested. On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:15 AM, John M McIntosh wrote: > A couple of years ago the Sophie team built out the logic to enable > the cut/copy/paste of a tremendous amount of clipboard data types in > and out of Squeak. > > For the macintosh this include image data, data from selections made > in the finder, and oh I don't know it seemed like 42 flavours of > Textual data. > > it seems a shame to let that go all to waste and let Pharo languish > with UTF-8. The problem has always been Oh EToys won't support FFI > so progress on this front seems dim. > > However I'm wondering if there is any interested if I port the Sophie > clipboard work to Pharo? Using FFI for the macintosh & Windows, where > windows > requires QuickTime for Window. > > Note the Sophie team decided because Quicktime for Window was a pre- > requirement for iTunes that well everyone has iTunes on windows > now... > > PS I note there are some hassles, Microsoft word for example sticks > both the TIFF for the page, the UTF-16, UTF-8, ascii, macroman etc. on > the the clipboard > for a page. Very difficult to figure out what to do for that, in that > case we knew the target was either image data, or text data, since we > knew what the target was, > but for Pharo I"m not sure what the solution would be. > > -- > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <johnmci(a)smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: > squeaker68882 > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// > www.smalltalkconsulting.com > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Baseline test results

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

where is the cs? why don't you publish it in PharoTaskForces? Stef On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > I have uploaded my cs to generate baseline test results here: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=954 > > and linked it off the wiki > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults. > > Anyone with write access to the wiki is welcome to run the tests in > new images / updates and post the results. Anyone with time on their > hands can also fill in the history! It is almost automated. See the > issue for a todo list; you can also post comments there. If anyone is > interested in reviewing or improving please do. Perhaps this could be > run as new pre-built images are uploaded to the download area? > > thanks, > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

by Lukas Renggli

> And I found out that its performance is terrible, it takes forever (you > perceive the delay) to open a browser, browse senders, change a method > selection on the OB or even do a "print-it" on a workspace. I use images that have the same tools loaded as the Seaside One-Click image for all my development (see the load script <http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ImageBuildScripts>). I find it pretty snappy, however I use the standard Squeak look: UIThemeStandardSqueak beCurrent Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi estaban > I recently downloaded the latest Pharo Dev and Web images, and also > the 2.8.4 one-click (which seems to be based on the Pharo image and > VM too). > > And I found out that its performance is terrible, it takes forever > (you perceive the delay) to open a browser, browse senders, change a > method selection on the OB or even do a "print-it" on a workspace. > > However when accessing seaside through the web UI, it's blazing > fast. Which makes me think there is something which is not working > as it should. PackageInfo and the package browser are slow. We are working on that. We removed recently the package annotation in the senders (because they scan all the image because of package info implementation) but we need this information to curve out etoys. You can take the default browser or the browser of lukas to get a much faster experience. > > As a side note, I downloaded the latest Cuis image from http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html > , and its amazingly fast. > As a side note. We do not consider ourselves in competition with Cuis. We integrated more than 1500 bug fixes and improvements (pragmas, closure compiler, traits....) and even more if we consider the version used in Cuis. We support truetype fonts and we are cleaning the system, when the cruft will be removed we will probably focus on making it faster. We are rewriting Package info from scratch. Now it takes time but feel free to join. Stef

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

>> > > Maybe we should point that out somewhere as we promote the dev-images > as being "Pharo"? > As we can see from some of the discussion on the Squeak list people > then think Pharo in general is dog slow... easy for them. Damien could you start to make pharo-dev having less tools and that we see what is the default UI? David is working on a new version of the browser but in case of speed problem we should probably use the one of lukas. Stef

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

by Michael Rueger

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:47 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > take the core image. > The default tools in web dev are too slow right now. Maybe we should point that out somewhere as we promote the dev-images as being "Pharo"? As we can see from some of the discussion on the Squeak list people then think Pharo in general is dog slow... Michael

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

take the core image. The default tools in web dev are too slow right now. Stef On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:05 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote: > Hi, > > I recently downloaded the latest Pharo Dev and Web images, and also > the 2.8.4 one-click (which seems to be based on the Pharo image and > VM too). > > And I found out that its performance is terrible, it takes forever > (you perceive the delay) to open a browser, browse senders, change a > method selection on the OB or even do a "print-it" on a workspace. > > However when accessing seaside through the web UI, it's blazing > fast. Which makes me think there is something which is not working > as it should. > > As a side note, I downloaded the latest Cuis image from http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html > , and its amazingly fast. > > Â¿Am I missing something? > > > Best regards, > > Esteban A. Maringolo > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] macintosh clipboard and images

by Michael Rueger

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:15 AM, John M McIntosh<johnmci(a)smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote: > However I'm wondering if there is any interested if I port the Sophie > clipboard work to Pharo? Using FFI for the macintosh & Windows, where > windows > requires QuickTime for Window. Hmm, I don't think the clipboard code needs Quicktime on Windows. I would rather vote for doing this in a plugin, extending on the Enhanced/ExtendedClipboard plugin. Michael

July 14, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Problem with encoding and double quotes

by Michael Rueger

2009/7/14 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>: The quotes you are mentioning are typographical quotes with unicode values > 255. > If I copy paste "Muelle Almirante Storni"Â in a workspace of Pharo, it is > perfectly understood. But if I pasteÂ I get: > Â ?Muelle Almirante Storni? I'm confused what works and doesn't work. Copy/paste within Pharo with normal or typographical quotes? > ' âMuelle Almirante Storniâ' findString: 'esquel' startingAt: 1 > caseSensitive: false > This has a problem (index out of range) because internaly it tries to ask > the asciiValue and this answers 2881 -> absurd > Is this a bug? or it is just like this ? sounds like two different bugs, the paste problem (if I understood you correctly) and the search problem. Michael

July 14, 2009