- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Robert Kovacic

I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List? Robert Kovacic wrote: > > I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo > directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the problem thank > you. > > > Gabriel Cotelli wrote: >> >> Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with NOD32 >> (and >> any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the changes >> file >> and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the Pharo >> directory from the scan list. >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk(a)bigpond.net.au> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP >>> with >>> a >>> 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or >>> more >>> to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772302.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772656.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Oct. 6, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Robert Kovacic

I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the problem thank you. Gabriel Cotelli wrote: > > Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with NOD32 > (and > any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the changes > file > and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the Pharo > directory from the scan list. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote: > >> >> I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP >> with >> a >> 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or >> more >> to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772302.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772639.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Oct. 6, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Robert Kovacic

I obtained the following results: "[3 + 4] timeToRun 0" and "[Time now ] timeToRun 0", however it still took about a second before each result was displayed (the hour glass icon flashed on briefly for each evaluation). In reply to the OP I am running the release version of Microsoft Security Essentials. Damien Cassou wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote: >> I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP >> with a >> 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or >> more >> to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? > > Takes no time on my computer. Could you please print the result of > this expression: > > [Time now] timeToRun > > > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772585.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Oct. 6, 2009

[Pharo-project] How to edit in the wiki

by Gabriel Cotelli

Hi, I want to update: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/PackagesTestedInPharoto include packages that I have tested that loads Ok on Pharo. Can anybody give me access to change this? Thanks, Gabriel

Oct. 6, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Gabriel Cotelli

Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with NOD32 (and any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the changes file and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the Pharo directory from the scan list. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP with > a > 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or > more > to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772302.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Oct. 6, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Damien Cassou

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote: > I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP with a > 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or more > to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? Takes no time on my computer. Could you please print the result of this expression: [Time now] timeToRun -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

Oct. 6, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Bug when I try save the image

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:43 AM, nullPointer <epicfan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > In latest Devs versions i get a error when i try save the image later i > saved > a morph in my UIBuilder. Seems something happens when try deallocate a > object, fails a primitive... That problem donÂ´t exists in Pharo Dev 10418 > build, only in latest versions. That problem donÂ´t exists too in Core > images.The problem donÂ´t appears too if i remove the fonts folder... > > For reproduce the error is needed have installed CLFramework. Start edit > and > save a CLView, and then save the Pharo image. The error message is > "FT2error: Freetype2 primitive failed [error 255] [Bad Squeak Method > Parameter]" . > > if you want that this bug keep stored somewhere so that someone can fix it in a future, please open a bug ticket: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/entry best mariano > Regards > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Bug-when-I-try-save-the-image-tp3763621p3763621.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Oct. 5, 2009

[Pharo-project] Performance in Workspace

by Robert Kovacic

I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP with a 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or more to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3772302.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Oct. 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [BUG]UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #null

by Andrey Larionov

Sorry, not reproducible in last WebDev. Switch to new image. Thanks. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 20:23, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Â <anlarionov(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Almost all refactorings ends with this DNU. Is it platform specific? Or >> maybe i miss something > > could you please describe all the steps to reproduce that from a clean download? > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Oct. 5, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Update stuck at #10457

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes I could but I need to know the correct version of Gofer and then I need to change the installGofer method of scriptLoader. Then this is not simple because I have to code this changes inside the cs else the old version of the script loader will point to an old version of the method. so yes this is possible but I would prefer to avoid it installGofer "self new installGofer" self class loadLatestPackage: 'Gofer' from: 'http://source.lukas- renggli.ch/flair' => installGofer "self new installGofer" ?? + "Postscript: Leave the line above, and replace the rest of this comment by a useful one. Executable statements should follow this comment, and should be separated by periods, with no exclamation points (!!). Be sure to put any further comments in double-quotes, like this one." | gofer packages | repository := MCHttpRepository location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo/' user: '' password: ''. "A. Load Gofer" =>>>> compile new methods ScriptLoader new installGofer. "B. Install packages" gofer := Gofer new. gofer url: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo'. packages := #( "Part 2.1" 'Kernel-MikeRoberts.408' "Part 3" 'CompilerTests-MikeRoberts.21' 'KernelTests-MikeRoberts.150' 'Compiler-MikeRoberts.130' "Part 4" 'Compiler-MikeRoberts.131' "Part 5" 'Kernel-MikeRoberts.409' "Part 6" 'Kernel-MikeRoberts.411' "Part 7" 'System-Changes-MikeRoberts.13' 'System-Download-MikeRoberts.11' 'System-Support-MikeRoberts.89' "Part 8" 'Tools-MikeRoberts.202' "Part 9 - setup recompile" 'System-Support-MikeRoberts.90'). packages do: [:each | gofer copy add: each; load]. "C. Recompile" Utilities initializeClosures. Utilities compileUsingClosures. ! On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > I'm hoping something like metacello in our process makes these things > go away ;-) > > can you retrospectively edit the update to point to the exact version? > > Mike > > On Monday, October 5, 2009, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> argh >>> lukas changed the gofer interface. >> >> I had to do this, because people have different naming conventions >> for >> packages. Before Gofer worked either for Moose or Seaside, but not >> for both at the same time. To solve the problem you have to follow >> the >> advice in the debugger. You tell Gofer if you specify an exact >> version >> (#addVersion:) or a package name (#addPackage:). If you don't do that >> (by proceeding or using #addPrefix:) the result is pretty much >> undefined. See the Moose mailing list for a lengthy discussion. >> >>> We should hardcode the number... >>> It was working before. >> >> For obvious reasons users of Gofer should always use a fixed version, >> not the "latest" one. >> >> Lukas >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Oct. 5, 2009