- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

by laurent laffont

Hi, tests result: 9449 run, 9356 passes, 57 expected failures, 16 failures, 20 errors, 0 unexpected passes On Linux, squeakvm 4.0.3-2202 See attached screenshot. How can I export test results into plain ASCII ? Cheers, Laurent Laffont http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/ http://magaloma.blogspot.com/

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Where should I put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic

by Mariano Martinez Peck

2010/5/21 Javier PimÃ¡s <elpochodelagente(a)gmail.com> > Wow, this is brilliant! it it'd have been of great help yesterday ;) > I am glad you like it. > I gave it a quick look an there's one thing I still don't know how > to do. I need to put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic inside GLMorphic package, but > as it isn't in any GLMorphic-* category it isn't automatically detected by > monticello. I don't see any button to add a class or category to the > package. What should I do? > > I don't know if I understood. I would recommend just to create a particular package in the same repository called ConfigurationOfGLMorphic where you put your class. Then your class will be in such package and will have also that category. This is what Henrik told you. Tell us if it is not yet clear. Cheers Mariano > thanks, > javier. > > 2010/5/21 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> > > >> >> 2010/5/21 Javier PimÃ¡s <elpochodelagente(a)gmail.com> >> >>> Hi, I made a very basic ConfigurationOfGLMorphic that manages it's >>> dependency on FFI. Where should I upload this configuration now? >>> >>> >> Hi Javier. Here I attach a first not-yet-draft chapter of Metacello. There >> you will find the answer ;) (feedback is welcome!!!) >> >> But in sumary, you should commit to the repository of the same project. In >> your case, as Igor said, to GLMorphic repository. >> There you can commit your development changes to the configuration. Once >> you have a released version, you just copy it to MetacelloConfiguration >> repository. >> >> Cheers >> >> Mariano >> >> >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Javier. >>> >>> -- >>> Javier PimÃ¡s >>> Ciudad de Buenos Aires >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Javier PimÃ¡s > Ciudad de Buenos Aires > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Metacello] Re: [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Hi Dale. Repository: http://www.squeaksource.com/HelpSystem package: Metacello-Help maybe you were not even aware of such package (me neither) hahah cheers mariano On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich(a)vmware.com> wrote: > Mariano, > > I'm not sure I am following ... What Help package are you referring to? > > Dale > ________________________________________ > From: metacello(a)googlegroups.com [metacello(a)googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck(a)gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:36 AM > To: Pharo Development; metacello(a)googlegroups.com > Subject: [Metacello] Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] > Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1 > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de<mailto: > astares(a)gmx.de>> wrote: > >Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I > will > >add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to > >ConfigurationOfHelpSystem > > > >It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For > >example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository. > >But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository. > > The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would > expect them to be in the same repo as the code. > I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code > it will be easier to know and maintain it. > > > 100% agree. > > Dale, do you think it is worth to take the Help package from HelpSystem > repository and put it in Metacello repo ? > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Metacello] Re: [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1

by Dale Henrichs

Mariano, I'm not sure I am following ... What Help package are you referring to? Dale ________________________________________ From: metacello(a)googlegroups.com [metacello(a)googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck(a)gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:36 AM To: Pharo Development; metacello(a)googlegroups.com Subject: [Metacello] Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo-1.1-11367-Beta1dev10.05.1 On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de<mailto:astares@gmx.de>> wrote: >Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I will >add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to >ConfigurationOfHelpSystem >It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For >example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository. >But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository. The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would expect them to be in the same repo as the code. I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code it will be easier to know and maintain it. 100% agree. Dale, do you think it is worth to take the Help package from HelpSystem repository and put it in Metacello repo ?

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Cross-fork Metacello configurations

by Miguel Enrique CobÃ¡ Martinez

El vie, 21-05-2010 a las 09:13 -0700, Sean P. DeNigris escribiÃ³: > I created a Squeak/Pharo SSpec, which puts the fork-specific world menu code > into a Platform package. > > As I work on the config, I came up against Pharo using Object as a subclass, > but the Squeak Inbox requiring (because of the browser tool) > MetacelloConfiguration. > > What would be the best/easiest way to deal with this? > > If the configs have to be forked, then Metacello really loses value (i.e. > #squeak and #pharo). And, I do a lot of work in both forks, so it would be > a shame to pick one to upload to and not share work that has already been > done with half the users. That was one of the problems of the Configuration Package proposed by Andreas. Promotes copy&paste of configurations (bad bad) and in the long term forks and completely rework to create configurations for Squeak and a different (although similar) for Pharo. As you say, it doesn't matter that Metacello is capable of installing cross-platform packages. With independently created configurations for the same packages, is has been stole of its usefulness and is discouraging Pharo users that have developed ConfigurationOfXXX that worked both in Squeak and Pharo in the past. > > Thanks. > Sean > -- Miguel CobÃ¡ http://miguel.leugim.com.mx

May 21, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11368

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

11368 ----- - Issue 737: part of -> WeakArray>>isFinalizationSupported cleaning. Thanks henrik - Issue 516: file exists enh. Thanks henrik - Issue 2447: menu item not showing up. Thanks alain - Issue 1709: Enhanced TextDiffBuilder from squeak trunk. Thanks henrik This is cool to have you around :) I mean really cool. Stef

May 21, 2010

[Pharo-project] Cross-fork Metacello configurations

by Sean P. DeNigris

I created a Squeak/Pharo SSpec, which puts the fork-specific world menu code into a Platform package. As I work on the config, I came up against Pharo using Object as a subclass, but the Squeak Inbox requiring (because of the browser tool) MetacelloConfiguration. What would be the best/easiest way to deal with this? If the configs have to be forked, then Metacello really loses value (i.e. #squeak and #pharo). And, I do a lot of work in both forks, so it would be a shame to pick one to upload to and not share work that has already been done with half the users. Thanks. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Cross-fork-Metacello-configurations-tp2226383p2226383… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Where should I put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic

by Henrik Johansen

Don't put it in the same package? Doesn't really make sense to have the configuration for how to load a package be part of the package itself... (though, it does make sense to keep them in the same repository) Cheers, Henry Den 21. mai 2010 kl. 17.52 skrev Javier PimÃ¡s <elpochodelagente(a)gmail.co m>: > Wow, this is brilliant! it it'd have been of great help yesterday ;) > I gave it a quick look an there's one thing I still don't > know how to do. I need to put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic inside > GLMorphic package, but as it isn't in any GLMorphic-* category it > isn't automatically detected by monticello. I don't see any button > to add a class or category to the package. What should I do? > > thanks, > javier. > > 2010/5/21 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> > > > 2010/5/21 Javier PimÃ¡s <elpochodelagente(a)gmail.com> > Hi, I made a very basic ConfigurationOfGLMorphic that manages it's > dependency on FFI. Where should I upload this configuration now? > > > Hi Javier. Here I attach a first not-yet-draft chapter of Metacello. > There you will find the answer ;) (feedback is welcome!!!) > > But in sumary, you should commit to the repository of the same > project. In your case, as Igor said, to GLMorphic repository. > There you can commit your development changes to the configuration. > Once you have a released version, you just copy it to > MetacelloConfiguration repository. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > > > Regards, > Javier. > > -- > Javier PimÃ¡s > Ciudad de Buenos Aires > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > -- > Javier PimÃ¡s > Ciudad de Buenos Aires > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Where should I put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic

by Javier PimÃ¡s

Wow, this is brilliant! it it'd have been of great help yesterday ;) I gave it a quick look an there's one thing I still don't know how to do. I need to put ConfigurationOfGLMorphic inside GLMorphic package, but as it isn't in any GLMorphic-* category it isn't automatically detected by monticello. I don't see any button to add a class or category to the package. What should I do? thanks, javier. 2010/5/21 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> > > > 2010/5/21 Javier PimÃ¡s <elpochodelagente(a)gmail.com> > >> Hi, I made a very basic ConfigurationOfGLMorphic that manages it's >> dependency on FFI. Where should I upload this configuration now? >> >> > Hi Javier. Here I attach a first not-yet-draft chapter of Metacello. There > you will find the answer ;) (feedback is welcome!!!) > > But in sumary, you should commit to the repository of the same project. In > your case, as Igor said, to GLMorphic repository. > There you can commit your development changes to the configuration. Once > you have a released version, you just copy it to MetacelloConfiguration > repository. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > > > >> Regards, >> Javier. >> >> -- >> Javier PimÃ¡s >> Ciudad de Buenos Aires >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Javier PimÃ¡s Ciudad de Buenos Aires

May 21, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] UI Builder

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

no idea. Indeed this was a bad idea to remove it. Stef On May 21, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > What is the state of the UI builder? When can we expect a > version that is compatible with Pharo 1.1.? > > Unfortunately the SqS project was removed ... so > no one can follow progress... > > Thx > T. > -- > GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

May 21, 2010