- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3335 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Number>>@

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3335 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Number>>@ http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3335 fix Attachments: Issue3335NumberRemoveDependenceToGraphicsPrimitive.1.cs 1.4 KB

Dec. 6, 2010

[Pharo-project] RPackage

by Cyrille Delaunay

Hello, Recently I made some improvements about RPackage. What I mainly did, is to implement the 'SystemAnnounncements listening', to update the organizer when the system change. With that I implemented a set of tests that should all be green now (in RPackageMCSynchronisationTest (I should change the name)). You can load RPackage by evaluating: Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoInbox'; package: 'ConfigurationOfRPackage'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfRPackage) perform: #loadDefault. (I think it should work, but squeaksource is down for now, so I was not able to test it). In those tests I started to write some about traits, but after few, I realized that the events emitted when a trait change are the same that the one used for classes ? Then if you have some ideas about what is still missing in RPackage, tell me, I can add it to my task list :)

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Debugger not closed issue ?

by laurent laffont

Thanks Sven. So it's a bug ? Laurent On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> wrote: > Laurent, > > I have 4 remaining in a long running 1.1 image. > > Sven > > On 06 Dec 2010, at 07:57, laurent laffont wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > can you check this please ? > > > > Take an image you work on (not a fresh one), and evaluate: > > > > Debugger closeAllDebuggers. > > Smalltalk garbageCollect. > > Debugger allInstances size. > > > > > > On a lot of my images 1 or 2 Debugger instances remains. It's a problem > for Autotest, but it also may be a side effect of Autotest, so I want to > check. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Laurent Laffont > > > > Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ > > Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ > > >

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Debugger not closed issue ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Laurent, I have 4 remaining in a long running 1.1 image. Sven On 06 Dec 2010, at 07:57, laurent laffont wrote: > Hi, > > can you check this please ? > > Take an image you work on (not a fresh one), and evaluate: > > Debugger closeAllDebuggers. > Smalltalk garbageCollect. > Debugger allInstances size. > > > On a lot of my images 1 or 2 Debugger instances remains. It's a problem for Autotest, but it also may be a side effect of Autotest, so I want to check. > > Cheers, > > Laurent Laffont > > Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ > Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] SqueakSource is down EOM

by Alexander LazareviÄ

I guess you're barking up the wrong tree, because despite it's name squeaksource is run by the pharo guys. 2010/12/6 Casey Ransberger <casey.obrien.r(a)gmail.com> > > > -- > Casey Ransberger > > > >

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Popularity or not of smalltalk?

by laurent laffont

And I've just seen the bottom of the message :), it seems http://langpop.com/ agree with TIOBE. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:51 AM, James Ladd <james_ladd(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> While pleading for Smalltalk support with a developer from a popular and >> great IDE company, I got the >> >> following response (below) >> >> >> Is there anything I can do/show to prove or disprove the popularity of >> Smalltalk? >> > > > According to TIOBE, Smalltalk is as popular as Erlang and more popular than > Scala http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html > > But that's only numbers and I don't trust it :) > > May be your developer from a "popular" IDE company should define what > "popular" means... > > Laurent > > > > >> >> Rgs, James. >> >> >> >>Hello James. >> >>About Smalltalk plugin. Weel, Iâm not sure Smalltalk has a big audience >> now. Iâve never heard about commercial products based on Smalltalk. >> >>Here, some statistics http://langpop.com/ >> > >

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Popularity or not of smalltalk?

by laurent laffont

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:51 AM, James Ladd <james_ladd(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > While pleading for Smalltalk support with a developer from a popular and > great IDE company, I got the > > following response (below) > > > Is there anything I can do/show to prove or disprove the popularity of > Smalltalk? > According to TIOBE, Smalltalk is as popular as Erlang and more popular than Scala http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html But that's only numbers and I don't trust it :) May be your developer from a "popular" IDE company should define what "popular" means... Laurent > > Rgs, James. > > > >>Hello James. > >>About Smalltalk plugin. Weel, Iâm not sure Smalltalk has a big audience > now. Iâve never heard about commercial products based on Smalltalk. > >>Here, some statistics http://langpop.com/ >

Dec. 6, 2010

[Pharo-project] Debugger not closed issue ?

by laurent laffont

Hi, can you check this please ? Take an image you work on (not a fresh one), and evaluate: Debugger closeAllDebuggers. Smalltalk garbageCollect. Debugger allInstances size. On a lot of my images 1 or 2 Debugger instances remains. It's a problem for Autotest, but it also may be a side effect of Autotest, so I want to check. Cheers, Laurent Laffont Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/

Dec. 6, 2010

[Pharo-project] Popularity or not of smalltalk?

by James Ladd

While pleading for Smalltalk support with a developer from a popular and great IDE company, I got the following response (below) Is there anything I can do/show to prove or disprove the popularity of Smalltalk? Rgs, James. >>Hello James.>>About Smalltalk plugin. Weel, Iâm not sure Smalltalk has a big audience now. Iâve never heard about commercial products based on Smalltalk. >>Here, some statistics http://langpop.com/

Dec. 6, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] ProcessWrapper

by Facundo Vozzi

Hi Levente, I'll try with ProcessWrapperPlugin in order to use it with Pharo 1.1.1. I would love that squeak and pharo join back together. Thanks you very much, Facu On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves(a)elte.hu> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Facundo Vozzi wrote: > > Hi all, >> anybody is using ProcessWrapper in Pharo 1.1.1 ? I'm using windows and It >> works fine on Squeak 4.1.1 but it doesn't on >> my Pharo 1.1.1 which is my development environment. >> > > I uploaded a new version to the repository (ProcessWrapper-Core.ul-30) > which fixes two issues in Pharo 1.2 (both related to the lack of proper > deprecation policy in Pharo). > > Pharo 1.1 (and 1.1.1) is a bit harder to fix, because there's a bug in > MIMEDocument class >> #guessTypeFromName:. This method tries to send > #forURIReturnSingleMimeTypeOrDefault: to MIMEType, but that class doesn't > implement this method. Actually no class implements this is Pharo 1.1. > > But you can avoid this problem by downloading the prebuilt plugin dll from > > http://people.inf.elte.hu/uzonyile/ProcessWrapper/2/ProcessWrapperPlugin.dl… copy it to your image or VM folder before loading the package to your > image. > > > Levente > > >> Thanks in advance, >> Facu >> >> >

Dec. 6, 2010