- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Issue 3510 in pharo: HistoryNode problem with two consecutives closeGroup

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: aplantec Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3510 by aplantec: HistoryNode problem with two consecutives closeGroup http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3510 The second closeGroup is not done

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3509 in pharo: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #1 on issue 3509 by tony.fleig: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509 Published to PharoInbox.

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3508 in pharo: cleanUpForProduction should really unload 'Graphics-Resources'

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #5 on issue 3508 by marianopeck: cleanUpForProduction should really unload 'Graphics-Resources' http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3508 Thanks adrian for the warning :) In inbox: Name: SLICE-Issue-3508-cleanUpForProductionShouldRemoveGraphicsResources-MarianoMartinezPeck.1 Author: MarianoMartinezPeck Time: 6 January 2011, 8:03:33 pm UUID: dc80b20c-ddce-41d2-b9e6-48e4c4fe5dc5 Ancestors: Dependencies: ScriptLoader12-MarianoMartinezPeck.365 fix to issue 3508

Jan. 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3509 in pharo: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 3509 by tony.fleig: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509 I have added multi-part MIME support to MailMessage. The package will be in PharoInbox as soon as I finish labeling the slice with the issue number assigned to this enhancement request. Included are a couple of tests for the new functionality.

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3508 in pharo: cleanUpForProduction should really unload 'Graphics-Resources'

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3508 by adrian.lienhard: cleanUpForProduction should really unload 'Graphics-Resources' http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3508 Hi Mariano. Here too, I checked with a 1.1.1 image. In 1.2 also the graphics package structure was changed (in a good way). Apparently this was done with issue ##2105. So the change you propose with this issue makes sense! Sorry for the confusion... Adrian

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3507 in pharo: SUnitUnloader >> unloadTestPackages is wrong and outdated

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Cc: stephane.ducasse Comment #2 on issue 3507 by marianopeck: SUnitUnloader >> unloadTestPackages is wrong and outdated http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3507 In inbox Name: SLICE-Issue-3507-unloadTestPackagesIsOutdated-MarianoMartinezPeck.1 Author: MarianoMartinezPeck Time: 6 January 2011, 7:35:54 pm UUID: c182a210-fb4f-4205-9c26-4f1874864774 Ancestors: Dependencies: SUnit-MarianoMartinezPeck.40121 Fix to issue 3507

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3507 in pharo: SUnitUnloader >> unloadTestPackages is wrong and outdated

by Adrian Lienhard

On Jan 6, 2011, at 17:54 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Thanks for the remark anyway Adrian. Now, after evaluating the unloads, I > open a Monticello Browser and I don't see any package as dirty. However, > this is not really confident. Sometimes Monticello shows a package not > direty, but just after doing a "changes" it gets dirty....is this enought or > I should do something else to be sure there are no dirties? Yes, there are indeed cases where the package is not correctly marked dirty. I think that's safe to verify with "changes", though. Cheers, Adrian

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Origins [poll]

by Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Monticello and source origin

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes more meta data would help Stef On Jan 5, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > When I create a changeset and file it out I can see > the image (Pharo/Squeak and version) that was used > to create the code in the header. > > Currently when I find an MCZ somewhere on the web > I'm not able to see if Pharo 1.0 or Pharo 1.2 or > Squeak 4.1 was used to create it. > > At least I havent found something when I check > "package", "version", "snapshot.bin" or "snapshot"/source > in the ZIP. > > Would'nt it make sense to add something like this? > > Thx > Torsten > > > -- > Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! > Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail >

Jan. 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Origins [poll]

by Alexandre Bergel

It would be cool to know what are your key interests Alexandre On 6 Jan 2011, at 14:04, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: > Name|Native Language|Greeting in native lang|Born country|Writing from > > Bernardo Contreras | Spanish | Hola | Argentina | Buenos Aires, Argentina > > > cheers > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Jan. 6, 2011