- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Metacello issue on Linux

by Dale Henrichs

Igor, I don't have a PharoCore1.3....what's the name of the mcz file that is being written? I would guess that monticello is trying to make a copy of the file in the package-cache when there is already an existing copy ... Do you happen to be using the package-cache as your source repository? Dale On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:10 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > Hello.. > > i trying to load VMMaker using metacello config on linux .. > > and it seems like a file system/plugins working differently there, so > during package loading > i got FileExists exception (for .mcz files which happen to be already > in package-cache). > > The error triggered in > MCCacheRepository(MCDirectoryRepository)>>writeStreamForFileNamed: > aString replace: aBoolean do: aBlock > > i don't know why it can't use cached version (since file already > exists, it should, yes?) > > > > Try issuing following in pharo-1.3 core > image(http://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/) > > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfCog'; > load. > > ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfCog) project > version: '1.2') load. > > > on mac it works well. > > Update: > > It appears that the bug triggers only if you have wiped-clean > package-cache dir , which is always true in my setup, because > i do 'rm -rf build' before starting putting things there. > > Here the package-cache contents at the moment of error: > > ls package-cache/ > ConfigurationOfCog-IgorStasenko.4.mcz > ConfigurationOfMetacello-DaleHenrichs.554.mcz > Metacello-Core-DaleHenrichs.455.mcz > ConfigurationOfHelpSystem-DaleHenrichs.13.mcz > Metacello-Base-DaleHenrichs.19.mcz > Metacello-MC-DaleHenrichs.505.mcz > > > i need help with it.. because it looks like a bad karma.. each time i > think that my build setup is ready to roll, some shitty thing pops up > and > blocks me from finishing things i do. > > > Before that i was using a script which were simply loaded a list of > .mcz packages from corresponding locations. And everything just > worked, > except that i chosen to use metacello.. to not have problems to deal > with need to load different packages for different forks, but now > metacello blocks me. :( > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by Geert Claes

A bit of a laugh, it's Friday after all :) http://forum.world.st/file/n3260143/PharoBoardAppeal2.png -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/thinking-about-a-community-model-of-funding-tp3259753… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] About FileSystem

by Dale Henrichs

On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:12 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Ok I'm trying > > I have > > version102: spec > <version: '1.0.2' imports: #('1.0-baseline') > > > spec for: #common do: [ > spec blessing: #release. > spec package: 'FileSystem']. > > > (ConfigurationOfFilesystem project version: '1.0.2') load > > worked now > > (MetacelloToolBox validateConfiguration: ConfigurationOfFilesystem) > inspect > > Critical Warning: No version specified for the package 'Filesystem' in version '1.0.1' { noVersionSpecified } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] > Critical Warning: The name of package 'FileSystem' does not match the file name 'Filesystem-cwp.63' in version '1.0.1' { packageNameMismatch } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] > Critical Warning: No version specified for the package 'Filesystem' in version '1.0.2' { noVersionSpecified } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] > > I was confused why this is a critical warning? > > MetacelloToolBox descriptionForValidationReasonCode: #noVersionSpecified > > I got a DNU at:at: Ah yes, the at:at: problem .. I have had a fix for that in 1.0-beta.28.3 for awhile but got busy and neglected to push out a new version ... too many things going on:( The description for #noVersionSpecified is: 'no version defined for the project reference or package. The version specified in the baseline or the latest version of the project or package in the repository will be used.' and the description for #packageNameMismatch is: 'the name in the packageSpec does not match the name of the mcz file.' You haven't provided the baseline spec or the spec for 1.0.1, but it looks like you must have used the name: Filesystem in the baseline, while you are using the name FileSystem (with a capital S) in the 1.0.2 spec and in the 1.0.1 spec. Perhaps you have renamed the package from Filesystem... to FileSystem...? #noVersionSpecified is a criticalWarning, because a version spec should have explicit versions specified for all packages and projects, otherwise you don't have a complete specification. As the 1.0.2 spec stands the latest mz file in the repository will be loaded. I'll try to push out 1.0-beta.28.3 this weekend:) Dale

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by Esteban Lorenzano

+1 El 04/02/2011, a las 4:13a.m., StÃ©phane Ducasse escribiÃ³: > Hi guys > > I would like to see a model like that around the pharo virtual machine emerging > http://phk.freebsd.dk/VML/ > > stef

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by Adrian Lienhard

*g* I was always annoyed by this Wikipedia banner as it just used up almost half of my browser window. And I don't think I need to be on such a banner either. Cheers, Adrian On Feb 4, 2011, at 13:46 , Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 4 February 2011 13:43, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Maybe we should follow the banner approach like wikipedia and wikileaks :) >> >> http://forum.world.st/file/n3260101/PharoBoardAppeal.png > > haha.. who is that gray alien between two humans? :) > > >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/thinking-about-a-community-model-of-funding-tp3259753… >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Alien on Pharo 1.2

by Luc Fabresse

Hi Serge, Sorry but I didn't write much in this chapter. I should continue on this ;-) #Luc 2011/2/4 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just committed new versions of Alien on squeaksource to make it run on > 1.2 > > I also modified the ConfigurationOfAlien to easily load it: > > (ConfigurationOfAlien project version: 'Pharo 1.1') load > > (ConfigurationOfAlien project version: 'Pharo 1.2') load > > (ConfigurationOfAlien project version: 'Pharo 1.1') load: {'All'. > 'MacOSX'} > > (ConfigurationOfAlien project version: 'Pharo 1.2') load: {'All'. > 'MacOSX'} > > #Luc > > > > Great work ! > Any news from the Alien chapter for the Pharo book ? ;-) > > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://doesnotunderstand.org/ > >

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by Igor Stasenko

On 4 February 2011 13:43, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe we should follow the banner approach like wikipedia and wikileaks :) > > http://forum.world.st/file/n3260101/PharoBoardAppeal.png haha.. who is that gray alien between two humans? :) > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/thinking-about-a-community-model-of-funding-tp3259753… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] News

by Igor Stasenko

On 4 February 2011 13:34, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > I love that! > Gorgeous! > Yes, that what means 'buildin on top of ...'. In that way people could quite easily follow the bleeding edge, because in minutes after pharo-core update they could see what new change meant to their own project, if it works well or breaks something badly. > Stef -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by Geert Claes

Maybe we should follow the banner approach like wikipedia and wikileaks :) http://forum.world.st/file/n3260101/PharoBoardAppeal.png -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/thinking-about-a-community-model-of-funding-tp3259753… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Feb. 4, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] thinking about a community model of funding

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> >> Hi guys >> >> I would like to see a model like that around the pharo virtual machine emerging >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/VML/ >> >> stef >> > > I was hung reading this page and look interesting (not only to Pharo) > else a lot of other open projects we do with Pharo. > > Personally I never tried this type of collection of money, but my > suspicion is that to work you need a critical mass of users, including > businesses Yes let us create it. I imagine that people would love to have a vm that is actively developed and not only by two guys that can have truck factor effect. No? I think that I would like to be able to say to people: invest on us because we are building a system that will survive us. Surviving us: - clean robust documented..... - easy to build.... and to my ears this looks like properties I like Stef

Feb. 4, 2011