- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OSVM pre-release 201802061430 ready to be tested

by Alistair Grant

Has anyone else run the pharo.cog.spur_linux32x86_201802061430.tar.gz VM successfully? If I try to Fetch or Pull incoming commits from Iceberg I get a "LGit_GIT_ERROR: Unsupported URL protocol" error. This also occurred with the first pre-release VM Fabio made available. The same Pharo image works without any problems in my current VM (Wed Jan 10 23:39:30 2018 -0800). OS: Ubuntu 16.04 VM: 5.0-201802061430 Tue Feb 6 17:16:07 UTC 2018 gcc 4.8.4 [Production Spur VM] CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2320 uuid: e2692e35-5fc8-4623-95d0-b445b3329f75 Feb 6 2018 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2324 uuid: 904abc56-e5a8-467e-a337-880211e33805 Feb 6 2018 VM: 201802061430 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Date: Tue Feb 6 15:30:09 2018 +0100 $ Plugins: 201802061430 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Linux travis-job-a0b5a72e-f64c-4657-8f31-f66a35a88881 4.4.0-101-generic #124~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 10 19:05:36 UTC 2017 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux plugin path: /tmp/phcogspurlinuxht/lib/pharo/5.0-201802061430 [default: /tmp/phcogspurlinuxht/lib/pharo/5.0-201802061430/] Thanks, Alistair Stack: LGitReturnCodeEnum>>handleLGitReturnCode LGitRemote(LGitExternalObject)>>withReturnHandlerDo: LGitRemote>>fetchWithCredentials: [ :repo | | gitRemote myCommit theirCommit mergeBase | "Fetch" gitRemote := (LGitRemote of: repo named: aRemote remoteName) lookup. gitRemote fetchWithCredentials: IceCredentialsProvider default. "Decide if we can fast-forward or we must do a real merge" myCommit := repo head object. theirCommit := repo head upstream object. mergeBase := repo mergeBaseBetween: myCommit id and: theirCommit id. mergeBase = myCommit id ifTrue: [ self pullRepositoryFastForward: repo ] ifFalse: [ self pullRepository: repo merge: myCommit with: theirCommit ] ] in IceLibgitLocalRepository>>pullFrom: in Block: [ :repo | ... [ | repo | repo := (LGitRepository on: self location) open. aBlock value: repo ] in IceLibgitLocalRepository>>withRepoDo: in Block: [ | repo |... [ self checkInitialized. aBlock value ] in LGitGlobal class>>runSequence: in Block: [ self checkInitialized.... [ activeProcess psValueAt: index put: anObject. aBlock value ] in LGitActionSequence(DynamicVariable)>>value:during: in Block: [ activeProcess psValueAt: index put: anObject.... BlockClosure>>ensure: LGitActionSequence(DynamicVariable)>>value:during: LGitActionSequence class(DynamicVariable class)>>value:during: LGitGlobal class>>runSequence: IceLibgitLocalRepository>>withRepoDo: IceLibgitLocalRepository>>pullFrom: IceRepository>>pullFrom: IceRepository>>pull [ self repository pull ] in IceRepositoryModel>>pull in Block: [ self repository pull ] BlockClosure>>on:do: IceRepositoryModel>>pull MessageSend>>value MessageSend>>cull: [ :presentation | presentation selection ifNotNil: [ :sel | (MessageSend receiver: sel selector: actionSelector) cull: presentation ] ] in GLMGenericAction>>selectionAction: in Block: [ :presentation | ... BlockClosure>>glamourValueWithArgs: GLMGenericAction(GLMAction)>>actOn: GLMGenericAction(GLMAction)>>morphicActOn: [ :ann | ann action morphicActOn: aPresentation ] in GLMMorphicFastTableRenderer(GLMMorphicWidgetRenderer)>>installActionsOnModel:fromPresentation: in Block: [ :ann | ann action morphicActOn: aPresentation ] BlockClosure>>cull: BlockClosure>>cull:cull: [ action cull: anAnnouncement cull: announcer ] in AnnouncementSubscription>>deliver: in Block: [ action cull: anAnnouncement cull: announcer ] BlockClosure>>on:do: BlockClosure>>on:fork: On 7 February 2018 at 08:22, Fabio Niephaus <lists(a)fniephaus.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > We were able to fix all build problems today, so here is the OpenSmalltalkVM pre-release 201802061430 [1]. > The Pharo VMs for macOS are now correctly signed. More importantly, they come with a fix for "Crashes while typing on macOS Sierra" [2]. > > Please give the VMs a try if you have some time and report any bugs at [3]. > > Best, > Fabio > > [1] https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/releases/tag/201802061430 > [2] https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/issues/141 > [3] https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/issues >

Feb. 8, 2018

Improve "Senders of"

by Marcus Denker

Hi, I tried to improve the âsenders ofâ behaviour in the case where you just put a selector (e.g. in the playground). needs some testing: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21251/Improve-Senders-of <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21251/Improve-Senders-of> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/810 <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/810> Marcus

Feb. 8, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg - creating virgin repos

by Pavel Krivanek

Does it work if you add the package, commit changes (without push) and then in separate step do the push? -- Pavel 2018-02-08 4:28 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com>: > If in the System Browser I do <Add Package...> and work a bit on it, > then later want to push it to a new github repo, what is the > recommended procedure? > > As a rough guess I tried the "New repository" button, then added the > package and a remote, but then trying to push gives me an error... > LGit_GIT_EUNBORNBRANCH: Reference 'refs/heads/master' not found > > At the moment I've only had success first creating the repo on github, > then cloning it - so I/m not sure how the "New repository" button is useful. > > cheers -ben >

Feb. 8, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] How to force a BaselineOf to load ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Thanks Cyril, I think I understand. I saw you opened an issue for this. I am working on upgrading my builds for pharo 7. > On 7 Feb 2018, at 15:12, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: >> Hi, >> > Hi, > >> I have a Pharo 4 (#40627) image that already contains P3. Now I want to update P3, without completely rebuilding this image from scratch. >> >> It seems as if an expression like >> >> Metacello new >> baseline: 'P3'; >> repository: 'github://svenvc/P3'; >> load. >> >> executed like >> >> $ ../bin/pharo build-trackit.image eval --save "Metacello new baseline: 'P3'; repository: 'github://svenvc/P3'; load" >> >> does not really reload the code. How can I force it to (re)load ? >> > IIRC, Dale worked on Metacello to introduce a new project kind in the > baseline to manage this problem. > > See thread: > http://forum.world.st/ANN-Metacello-support-for-GitFileTree-metadata-less-m… > > So you need to implement this method in the baseline: > > projectClass > > ^ MetacelloCypressBaselineProject > > Quoted from Dale > (http://forum.world.st/unsolicited-package-cache-use-td5060335.html > Jan 18, 2018; 4:10pm): > Â«if not, then what looks like a package-cache problem could be that > you haven't told Metacello that you are using a metadataless > filetree/tonel repository. > > Metacello has an internal rule to not load Monticello packages of the > same version, since they are already loaded. However, when using > metadataless repositories the filetree/tonel Monticello package > readers typically generate a package name using the author/version > `-cypress.1`, which make Metacello think that the versions are the > same and the package is not loaded ... by including the above method > in your baselineof, Metacello will know to ignore the Monticello > author/version of the package and always load it.... > > Of course, because Monticello only installs changed definitions when > loading a package, "loading the same package over and over again" > costs a little bit in loading the _definitions_ into the image from > disk, but doesn't end up compiling any new methods or creating new > classes ...Â» > BUT! Because there is a but... This is not present by default in > Pharo... To get it, we need to upgrade Matacello :( > > >> Thx, >> >> Sven > > > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr

Feb. 8, 2018

Calypso wishlist

by Stephane Ducasse

Hi denis - I would like to be able to define a method even in the class pane and that the system detects it automatically. - Then we are starting to reverse engineering the ecompletion system and I'm learning it. I would like to know if Calypso can communicate with ecompletion the fact that we are defining a method. Then I have to check how the system can know that we are typing method argument when defining the signature but I think that this is not related to calypso. Stef

Feb. 8, 2018

Iceberg experience report - synchronising README change made on github

by Ben Coman

Could the Iceberg gurus try and comment on the following workflow. Please familiarise with the first four commits here... https://github.com/Traadh/cloudflareun/network from these actions... "first commit" -- on github I created it as an unitialized repo to try to push a "new repo" to it per my other post, but when that failed from the command line I did `git init; git add README; git remote ...; git push ...`) "First Pharo code" -- cloned the repo with Iceberg, added a package, synchronised, added commit comment and clicked <Commit and push onto master> "Update class comment" -- edited the class comment, then from Iceberg synchronised, added commit comment and clicked <Commit and push onto master> "Updated README" -- on github, used the built-in editor to easily preview markdown. Clicked its <Commit directly to the master branch.> PROBLEM... Now I'm at a point having trouble synchronising Iceberg to pick up that last change. 1. Right-clicked on "cloudflareun" and chose "Synchronise repository..." 2. In [Update] tab, clicked <Fetch new versions> and listed under [commits to be imported] is "Updated README". Good. 3. Then clicked on <Pull> which I expected would load that commit into the Image, and a new commit "Merge with ref/remotes/origin/master" showed up in [commit to be imported] So now I'm lost. It seems the <Pull> only operates on the disk? But why does it create a merge commit? It should have fast-forwarded. Checking from the command line, only shows the first three commits are common with the github network graph. The fourth commit is the new merge commit. $ git log commit f49c64a7751f95712acc30dab692fc7e85e0c810 Merge: c818e9a 52ab6ac Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:55:34 2018 +0800 Merge with refs/remotes/origin/master commit c818e9adebeb6be001b202aa48da009be97920eb Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:42:57 2018 +0800 Update class comment. commit 6f2df89b219c56530412252ace96bc95eb78373a Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:37:01 2018 +0800 First Pharo code commit 52ab6ac696760a60fe56af57e45f2e2ceaaae35e Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:31:28 2018 +0800 first commit Checking the remote... $ git log origin/master commit 52ab6ac696760a60fe56af57e45f2e2ceaaae35e Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:31:28 2018 +0800 first commit Whoops... not what I expected but I don't think that affected anything now. Probably it was left over from early attempts to create a "new" "cloudflareun" repo. Try again... $ git remote --v origin git@github.com:Traadh/cloudflareun.git (fetch) origin git@github.com:Traadh/cloudflareun.git (push) traadh git@github.com:Traadh/cloudflareun.git (fetch) traadh git@github.com:Traadh/cloudflareun.git (push) $ git log traadh/master commit 587bed95c4b8fb3986c9962c9206405c81c99e3d Author: Ben Coman <github.com(a)ben.coman.com.au> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:54:20 2018 +0800 Updated README commit c818e9adebeb6be001b202aa48da009be97920eb Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:42:57 2018 +0800 Update class comment. commit 6f2df89b219c56530412252ace96bc95eb78373a Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:37:01 2018 +0800 First Pharo code commit 52ab6ac696760a60fe56af57e45f2e2ceaaae35e Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:31:28 2018 +0800 first commit So there are the four commits matching github. So it seems that Iceberg's FETCH did the right thing updating the remote. But the disk working directory should have just fast-forwarded rather than merging. Now seeing both these commits... * Merge with ref/remotes/origin/master * Updated README in the one [New commits to be imported] seems to be mixing results from the working repo and the remote repo in a way that makes it hard to guess the consequence of any next action here. I do see a <Merge and load> option when I right-click on one of those commits. Perhaps the "load" means to load from the disk working directory into the Image(?) but its a bit hidden compared to the <Fetch> and <Pull> that are buttons. It seems dangerous to take that action right now, since I guess the Image would diverge from the disk working directory. FIXING... What I ended up doing was remove the "merge commit" from the disk working directory $ git reset --hard HEAD^ then opened a new Iceberg which for [Updates] only showed only the single commit "Updated README" fetched into the remote repo. Good. I right-clicked on that and did <Merge and load> which correctly fast-forwarded the disk working directory... $ git log commit 587bed95c4b8fb3986c9962c9206405c81c99e3d Author: Ben Coman <github.com(a)ben.coman.com.au> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:54:20 2018 +0800 Updated README commit c818e9adebeb6be001b202aa48da009be97920eb Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:42:57 2018 +0800 Update class comment. commit 6f2df89b219c56530412252ace96bc95eb78373a Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:37:01 2018 +0800 First Pharo code commit 52ab6ac696760a60fe56af57e45f2e2ceaaae35e Author: Ben Coman <btc(a)openInWorld.com> Date: Thu Feb 8 11:31:28 2018 +0800 first commit However the same "Updated README" commit still shows in [New commits to be imported] tab, but now its right-click menu item now shows only <Load> rather than <Merge and load>. So it seem to correctly identify the disk working directory is up to date but clicking on <Load> doesn't change anything. Perhaps because there is no Pharo code to load? Since only the README outside the "src" directory changed? Moving to the [Push] tab, this shows the four commits seen in the last `git log` This is confusing since I'd expect this to be empty since... $ git log > /tmp/x1 $ git log traadh/master > /tmp/x2 $ diff /tmp/x1 /tmp/x2 is empty Luckily clicking <Publish all> cleared out this list with no impact on github network graph https://github.com/Traadh/cloudflareun/network SUMMARY In the end I seem to got done what I needed. I'm enjoying Iceberg more and more as I rub off the rough edges my understanding it. Hopefully my report will help smooth things for others. My only remaining niggle is not being able to get rid of this "1 incoming", but maybe that will disappear when I've got a code update to upload. cheers -ben P.S. It might be if the Iceberg [Remotes] could have a "Log" menu item that worked like `git log`. P.P.S. I think more thought needs to be given to whether mixing updates from both the remote and disk working directory in the one pane is beneficial? As an alternative, perhaps some side-scrolling GTInspector-like panes Image <--> Working Directory <--> Remote <--> Server(github) would better represent the git model. Or maybe statically position those panes in one window with buttons on directed lines showing which way and how far a commit moves when that button is pushed.

Feb. 8, 2018

Iceberg - creating virgin repos

by Ben Coman

If in the System Browser I do <Add Package...> and work a bit on it, then later want to push it to a new github repo, what is the recommended procedure? As a rough guess I tried the "New repository" button, then added the package and a remote, but then trying to push gives me an error... LGit_GIT_EUNBORNBRANCH: Reference 'refs/heads/master' not found At the moment I've only had success first creating the repo on github, then cloning it - so I/m not sure how the "New repository" button is useful. cheers -ben

Feb. 8, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #509: 20254-Playground-should-ask-to-create-class-for-non-Existing-Globals

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #509 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #806 was integrated: "20254-Playground-should-ask-to-create-class-for-non-Existing-Globals" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/806 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20254 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Feb. 7, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] another file reference question

by Stephane Ducasse

Now what is the difference between / and resolve: because this is the only difference with my code. I used path because it was the only way I could make sense. I will update the documentation :( this will be my cross. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Tx alistair > > Yes this is what I want. > I tried to copy (before your post and I do not recall that copy was > creating the intermediate folders). > > Stef > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Stef, >> >> Assuming I understand what you're trying to do: >> >> This is broken out to hopefully make it clear what the steps are: >> >> | src srcPrefix dstPrefix dst | >> >> src := 'a/b/c/d.pi' asFileReference. >> srcPrefix := 'a' asFileReference. >> dstPrefix := 'result' asFileReference. >> dst := dstPrefix resolve: (src relativeTo: srcPrefix). >> dst >> >> >> At that point presumably you want: >> >> src copyTo: dst. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Alistair >> >> >> >> >> On 6 February 2018 at 21:50, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks alistair >>> >>> What I want to know is a different of paths between two paths so that >>> after I can reproduce the structure under another folder. >>> Example >>> >>> a/b/c/d.pi >>> I should ''copy'' it into result folder and I should get >>> >>> result/b/c/d.pi >>> >>> now I compute the path >>> >>> What is the path of a/b/c/d.pi in a => b/c/d.pi and I should then >>> 'copy' to result/b/c/d.pi >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Stef, >>>> >>>> On 2 February 2018 at 20:58, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Then I do not get why / is expecting a string and cannot accept a path. >>>>> >>>>> Then I do not get why we have paths. >>>>> Stef >>>> >>>> Paths are intended to be internal, and not something you ever deal >>>> with directly. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand what you want to do, but maybe try replacing >>>> #/ with #resolve:, e.g.: >>>> >>>> '/home' asFileReference resolve: 'user' asFileReference >>>> " File @ /home/user" >>>> >>>> >>>> or: >>>> >>>> '/home' asFileReference resolve: 'user' asFileReference path >>>> " File @ /home/user" >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alistair >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse >>>>> <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> HI >>>>>> >>>>>> I have the following scenario: >>>>>> >>>>>> '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result' >>>>>> asFileReference / >>>>>> 'book.pillar' >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> "File @ /Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result/book.pillar" >>>>>> >>>>>> ok it works. >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to update the contents of a target folder only if a file is >>>>>> missing or too old compared to a source. >>>>>> >>>>>> The idea is that I have a target folder and I need to know if a file >>>>>> located in the source tree should be copied under the target. >>>>>> So I compute the difference from the root of the source to the file >>>>>> and I want to apply this path to the target to check some file >>>>>> properties. >>>>>> >>>>>> now I do not understand how I can get the following working: >>>>>> >>>>>> '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result' >>>>>> asFileReference >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>> ('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/book.pillar' >>>>>> asFileReference path) >>>>>> relativeTo: ('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo' >>>>>> asFileReference path) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Stef >>>>> >>>> >>> >>

Feb. 7, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] another file reference question

by Stephane Ducasse

Tx alistair Yes this is what I want. I tried to copy (before your post and I do not recall that copy was creating the intermediate folders). Stef On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stef, > > Assuming I understand what you're trying to do: > > This is broken out to hopefully make it clear what the steps are: > > | src srcPrefix dstPrefix dst | > > src := 'a/b/c/d.pi' asFileReference. > srcPrefix := 'a' asFileReference. > dstPrefix := 'result' asFileReference. > dst := dstPrefix resolve: (src relativeTo: srcPrefix). > dst > > > At that point presumably you want: > > src copyTo: dst. > > > Cheers, > Alistair > > > > > On 6 February 2018 at 21:50, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks alistair >> >> What I want to know is a different of paths between two paths so that >> after I can reproduce the structure under another folder. >> Example >> >> a/b/c/d.pi >> I should ''copy'' it into result folder and I should get >> >> result/b/c/d.pi >> >> now I compute the path >> >> What is the path of a/b/c/d.pi in a => b/c/d.pi and I should then >> 'copy' to result/b/c/d.pi >> >> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Stef, >>> >>> On 2 February 2018 at 20:58, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Then I do not get why / is expecting a string and cannot accept a path. >>>> >>>> Then I do not get why we have paths. >>>> Stef >>> >>> Paths are intended to be internal, and not something you ever deal >>> with directly. >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand what you want to do, but maybe try replacing >>> #/ with #resolve:, e.g.: >>> >>> '/home' asFileReference resolve: 'user' asFileReference >>> " File @ /home/user" >>> >>> >>> or: >>> >>> '/home' asFileReference resolve: 'user' asFileReference path >>> " File @ /home/user" >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alistair >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse >>>> <stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> HI >>>>> >>>>> I have the following scenario: >>>>> >>>>> '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result' >>>>> asFileReference / >>>>> 'book.pillar' >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> "File @ /Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result/book.pillar" >>>>> >>>>> ok it works. >>>>> >>>>> I want to update the contents of a target folder only if a file is >>>>> missing or too old compared to a source. >>>>> >>>>> The idea is that I have a target folder and I need to know if a file >>>>> located in the source tree should be copied under the target. >>>>> So I compute the difference from the root of the source to the file >>>>> and I want to apply this path to the target to check some file >>>>> properties. >>>>> >>>>> now I do not understand how I can get the following working: >>>>> >>>>> '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/_result' >>>>> asFileReference >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> ('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/book.pillar' >>>>> asFileReference path) >>>>> relativeTo: ('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/MyBooks/Bk-Writing/PharoBooks/Booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo' >>>>> asFileReference path) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>> >>> >> >

Feb. 7, 2018