July 2020 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo 9.0] Build #486: Variables-isGlobal-Cleanup

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #486 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6805 was integrated: "Variables-isGlobal-Cleanup" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6805 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Variables Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 11, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spec2 dynamic list layouts seem confused

by Esteban Lorenzano

Yes, I think they need to be removed. On ven., juil. 10, 2020 at 10:17, Martin McClure <martin(a)hand2mouse.com> wrote: > Hi Esteban, > > It's good to hear that all layouts are now dynamic! > > Does that mean that you'll be removing > SpDynamicPresentersListBuilder and friends? If not, it still needs to > be fixed. > > Thanks, > -Martin > > On 7/10/20 1:47 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> In fact, all those examples needs to be removed and replaced by new >> ones. They correspond to a moment where Spec was very static. But >> now all layouts are dynamic so they do not have sense (and they do >> not work fine either). >> >> Next merge (0.8) will have a focus on those details, now that we are >> arriving to a semi-stable status :) >> >> Esteban >> >> On jeu., juil. 9, 2020 at 23:03, Martin McClure >> <martin(a)hand2mouse.com> <mailto:martin@hand2mouse.com> wrote: >>> I wanted to see examples of dynamic layout in Spec2, and tried >>> SpCalendarPresenter. >>> >>> AFAICT, SpCalendarPresenter is doing the right thing, using >>> SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout. However, the subclasses of >>> SpDynamicPresentersListLayout seem to have the concepts of row and >>> column swapped, so that the SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout is >>> actually doing what the SpDynamicTopToBottomRowsLayout should do. >>> And vice versa. >>> >>> I hope to take a deeper look tomorrow. >>> >>> If I wanted to submit a pull request with the fix, what repo should >>> I be working with? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Martin >>> >

July 11, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #485: AST-deprecate-methodComments

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #485 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6814 was integrated: "AST-deprecate-methodComments" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6814 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/AST Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 11, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #484: Monticello-support-UndefinedSlot

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #484 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6819 was integrated: "Monticello-support-UndefinedSlot" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6819 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Monticello Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 10, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #482: 6008-Two-methods-to-test-if-a-node-is-an-argument

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #482 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6815 was integrated: "6008-Two-methods-to-test-if-a-node-is-an-argument" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6815 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6008 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 10, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spec2 dynamic list layouts seem confused

by Martin McClure

Hi Esteban, It's good to hear that all layouts are now dynamic! Does that mean that you'll be removing SpDynamicPresentersListBuilder and friends? If not, it still needs to be fixed. Thanks, -Martin On 7/10/20 1:47 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi Martin, > > In fact, all those examples needs to be removed and replaced by new > ones. They correspond to a moment where Spec was very static. But now > all layouts are dynamic so they do not have sense (and they do not > work fine either). > > Next merge (0.8) will have a focus on those details, now that we are > arriving to a semi-stable status :) > > Esteban > > On jeu., juil. 9, 2020 at 23:03, Martin McClure > <martin(a)hand2mouse.com> wrote: >> I wanted to see examples of dynamic layout in Spec2, and tried >> SpCalendarPresenter. AFAICT, SpCalendarPresenter is doing the right >> thing, using SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout. However, the >> subclasses of SpDynamicPresentersListLayout seem to have the concepts >> of row and column swapped, so that the >> SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout is actually doing what the >> SpDynamicTopToBottomRowsLayout should do. And vice versa. I hope to >> take a deeper look tomorrow. If I wanted to submit a pull request >> with the fix, what repo should I be working with? Thanks, -Martin

July 10, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #481: [Disable Flaky Tests] Disable continuation flaky test

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #481 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6767 was integrated: "[Disable Flaky Tests] Disable continuation flaky test" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6767 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/flackyContinuationTest Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 10, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Webminar about VA Smalltalk new OS Process Framework

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Thank you everyone for attending. For those that missed it (or want to re-watch it hahahaha), below is the link to YouTube: https://youtu.be/uwEu_-tflKg Best regards, On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:36 AM Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings all, This is a friendly reminder of the presentation we will > host tomorrow for VAST's newest OSProcess framework. Best regards, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:25 AM Mariano Martinez Peck < > marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Greetings all, >> >> Some time ago, I had the pleasure and privilege of being sponsored by the >> Pharo Consortium to implement OSSubprocess. Because of that work, I quickly >> realized that a new OS process framework created by Instantiations was >> quite advanced and unlike anything I had seen before. If you are able, I >> would highly recommend that you attend the technology preview of this >> framework coming to VAST 2021: >> >> Seth Berman will be presenting, registration here: >> https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7491754880594201356 >> >> We hope the community can attend and we look forward to your feedback and >> questions during the event's Q&A session. >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- >> Mariano Martinez Peck >> Email: marianopeck(a)gmail.com >> Twitter: @MartinezPeck >> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-martinez-peck >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-mart%C3%ADnez-peck/> >> Blog: https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/ >> > > > -- > Mariano Martinez Peck > Email: marianopeck(a)gmail.com > Twitter: @MartinezPeck > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-martinez-peck > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-mart%C3%ADnez-peck/> > Blog: https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/ > -- Mariano Martinez Peck Email: marianopeck(a)gmail.com Twitter: @MartinezPeck LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-martinez-peck <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-mart%C3%ADnez-peck/> Blog: https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/

July 10, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #480: FFI-use-new-propertyAPI

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #480 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6806 was integrated: "FFI-use-new-propertyAPI" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6806 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/FFI Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

July 10, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] Spec2 dynamic list layouts seem confused

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi Martin, In fact, all those examples needs to be removed and replaced by new ones. They correspond to a moment where Spec was very static. But now all layouts are dynamic so they do not have sense (and they do not work fine either). Next merge (0.8) will have a focus on those details, now that we are arriving to a semi-stable status :) Esteban On jeu., juil. 9, 2020 at 23:03, Martin McClure <martin(a)hand2mouse.com> wrote: > I wanted to see examples of dynamic layout in Spec2, and tried > SpCalendarPresenter. > > AFAICT, SpCalendarPresenter is doing the right thing, using > SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout. However, the subclasses of > SpDynamicPresentersListLayout seem to have the concepts of row and > column swapped, so that the SpDynamicLeftToRightColumnsLayout is > actually doing what the SpDynamicTopToBottomRowsLayout should do. And > vice versa. > > I hope to take a deeper look tomorrow. > > If I wanted to submit a pull request with the fix, what repo should I > be working with? > > Thanks, > -Martin >

July 10, 2020