June 2020 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo 9.0] Build #330: Deprecated Slot

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #330 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6475 was integrated: "Deprecated Slot" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6475 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/DeprecatedSlot Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 3, 2020

[Pharo 8.0] Build #1138: 6420-Backport-5482-to-Pharo8

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1138 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6427 was integrated: "6420-Backport-5482-to-Pharo8" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6427 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6420 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 3, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #329: Fixes changes file flushing issue

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #329 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6468 was integrated: "Fixes changes file flushing issue" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6468 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6063 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 3, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #328: Fix #6472

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #328 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6473 was integrated: "Fix #6472" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6473 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/fix/6472 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About strange email related to smalltalkhub read-only on squeak-dev

by Norbert Hartl

Stef, that is a second problem. The main problem to me is solving the crypto stuff once and for all. And then I would like to know why people like Ron say things like this. But yes, shouldn't go without explanation/reaction! Norbert > Am 03.06.2020 um 00:13 schrieb StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > What I do not like is that people say " group but they keep kicking me out of their mailing list â when this is absolutely not true! > > We can discuss and can argue even violently but we do not lie. > > S. > > > >> On 31 May 2020, at 19:38, Bruce O'Neel <bruce.oneel(a)pckswarms.ch <mailto:bruce.oneel@pckswarms.ch>> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> So addressing only the crypto software issue and with the caveat that I am also not a lawyer but I have had to deal with certain aspects of this in the past.... >> >> Crypto software is one of those bizarre dual use items in terms of arms imports and exports. While we as geeks just think of this is software or mathematics and might be confused as to why governments care, governments do care deeply about this. And their way of expressing how much they care about this issue is by passing laws and prosecuting folks. >> >> One of the easiest ways to get in trouble is for one to make the software available to residents and/or citizens of certain countries as well as available to people on a long list kept by different governments. We can have a long debate about the morality of this concept but those who make the laws have decided that is the law. And often these laws are crafted such that the executive can change important details on short notice and that puts the risk of prosecution at the whims of different world leaders. >> >> The license that the software is released under is not important. >> >> What Ron is stating is that squeak source supplied some additional protections to prevent accidentally making the software available to folks who the US feels should not have access. >> >> If you have moved the software to another hosting provider without the permission or knowledge of the author, and therefore the owner of the software, you have put that person at additional risk. In addition you and the hosting provider are taking on additional risk. >> >> If it was moved to GitHub I strongly recommend reviewing their policies on trade controls and what risks you assume. >> >> https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-and-trade-controls <https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-and-trade-controls> >> >> Finally I would strongly recommend talking to a competent legal advisor who is deeply familiar with the details of these laws. They are complex and highly variable between different parts of the world. >> >> I know this seems like a lot of trouble and wasted time but you can spend a giant amount of time and money defending oneself from arms trafficking charges. >> >> cheers >> >> bruce >> >> 30 May 2020 14:43 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr <mailto:stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> This is the week-end and we worked super well yesterday during the sprint. Lot of good enhancements - Thanks a lot to all the participants. >> I not really happy to be forced to do it on a sunny saturday but Iâm doing it to clarify points. >> >> Esteban sent me this text that was posted on Squeak-Dev (I personally do not read squeak related forums because >> I have not the time and my focus is Pharo, its consortium, my team, my research and my family). >> >> We have to react because >> - We do not really at ***all** understand this email >> - We did not kicked anybody from our mailing-list from ages - so ron is lying. In the past we even had discussion with ron - so we do not >> really understand. May be we got problem to log on our mailing-lists. >> We have no idea because we are working and not looking at such things. >> - When we migrated smalltalkhub to readonly we payed attention to make sure that private projects stay private. >> We did not migrated smalltalkhub for fun. We MUST do it or it will be done by our infrastructure! >> - Now the cryptography packages are MIT and they are public anyway. So again we do not understand anything. >> >> We do not get why Ron contacted us because we announced the migration publicly way in advance and we will keep >> the Smalltalkhub frozen repo for at least next 5 years. >> >> I feel really sorry to hear such kind of email because we do not want to fight with anybody. >> Our goal is to make sure that people can work with Pharo and expand their business and knowledge. >> We are working hard to make sure that people can invent their future with Pharo and people that know us personally >> know that we are not lying. >> >> S >> >> >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've tried to work with the Pharo group but they keep kicking me out of their mailing list. I've already mentioned this a number of times to the Pharo group but nobody seems to care. >>> >>> BOLD BOLD BOLD PLEASE TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY BOLD BOLD BOLD >>> >>> I am not a lawyer but we used very good lawyers to make the squeaksource repository a safe place to do cryptography work. If you are working on cryptography DO NOT POST your code anywhere except squeaksource. Especially if you are in the USA. The ONLY repository that is approved to host our cryptography code in the USA and therefore not subject to criminal violations is squeaksource. It is a CRIME in the USA to move code and make it available on the internet for everyone to download! It must be hosted on squeaksoruce.com <http://squeaksoruce.com/> or another location that is also properly registered. >>> >>> IF YOU COPIED CRYPTOGRAPHY CODE TO ANOTHER REPOSITORY THAT IS NOT REGISTERED I would recommend you delete it immediately. >>> >>> END BOLD! >>> >>> Please feel free to post this to the Pharo mailing list because they apparently do not want to hear from me! >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> Ron Teitelbaum >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> StÃ©phane Ducasse >> http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> >> 03 59 35 87 52 >> Assistant: Aurore Dalle >> FAX 03 59 57 78 50 >> TEL 03 59 35 86 16 >> S. Ducasse - Inria >> 40, avenue Halley, >> Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza >> Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 >> France >> > > -------------------------------------------- > StÃ©phane Ducasse > http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> > 03 59 35 87 52 > Assistant: Aurore Dalle > FAX 03 59 57 78 50 > TEL 03 59 35 86 16 > S. Ducasse - Inria > 40, avenue Halley, > Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza > Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 > France >

June 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] About strange email related to smalltalkhub read-only on squeak-dev

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

What I do not like is that people say " group but they keep kicking me out of their mailing list â when this is absolutely not true! We can discuss and can argue even violently but we do not lie. S. > On 31 May 2020, at 19:38, Bruce O'Neel <bruce.oneel(a)pckswarms.ch> wrote: > > > Hi, > > So addressing only the crypto software issue and with the caveat that I am also not a lawyer but I have had to deal with certain aspects of this in the past.... > > Crypto software is one of those bizarre dual use items in terms of arms imports and exports. While we as geeks just think of this is software or mathematics and might be confused as to why governments care, governments do care deeply about this. And their way of expressing how much they care about this issue is by passing laws and prosecuting folks. > > One of the easiest ways to get in trouble is for one to make the software available to residents and/or citizens of certain countries as well as available to people on a long list kept by different governments. We can have a long debate about the morality of this concept but those who make the laws have decided that is the law. And often these laws are crafted such that the executive can change important details on short notice and that puts the risk of prosecution at the whims of different world leaders. > > The license that the software is released under is not important. > > What Ron is stating is that squeak source supplied some additional protections to prevent accidentally making the software available to folks who the US feels should not have access. > > If you have moved the software to another hosting provider without the permission or knowledge of the author, and therefore the owner of the software, you have put that person at additional risk. In addition you and the hosting provider are taking on additional risk. > > If it was moved to GitHub I strongly recommend reviewing their policies on trade controls and what risks you assume. > > https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-and-trade-controls <https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-and-trade-controls> > > Finally I would strongly recommend talking to a competent legal advisor who is deeply familiar with the details of these laws. They are complex and highly variable between different parts of the world. > > I know this seems like a lot of trouble and wasted time but you can spend a giant amount of time and money defending oneself from arms trafficking charges. > > cheers > > bruce > > 30 May 2020 14:43 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi all > > This is the week-end and we worked super well yesterday during the sprint. Lot of good enhancements - Thanks a lot to all the participants. > I not really happy to be forced to do it on a sunny saturday but Iâm doing it to clarify points. > > Esteban sent me this text that was posted on Squeak-Dev (I personally do not read squeak related forums because > I have not the time and my focus is Pharo, its consortium, my team, my research and my family). > > We have to react because > - We do not really at ***all** understand this email > - We did not kicked anybody from our mailing-list from ages - so ron is lying. In the past we even had discussion with ron - so we do not > really understand. May be we got problem to log on our mailing-lists. > We have no idea because we are working and not looking at such things. > - When we migrated smalltalkhub to readonly we payed attention to make sure that private projects stay private. > We did not migrated smalltalkhub for fun. We MUST do it or it will be done by our infrastructure! > - Now the cryptography packages are MIT and they are public anyway. So again we do not understand anything. > > We do not get why Ron contacted us because we announced the migration publicly way in advance and we will keep > the Smalltalkhub frozen repo for at least next 5 years. > > I feel really sorry to hear such kind of email because we do not want to fight with anybody. > Our goal is to make sure that people can work with Pharo and expand their business and knowledge. > We are working hard to make sure that people can invent their future with Pharo and people that know us personally > know that we are not lying. > > S > > > >> Hi all, >> >> I've tried to work with the Pharo group but they keep kicking me out of their mailing list. I've already mentioned this a number of times to the Pharo group but nobody seems to care. >> >> BOLD BOLD BOLD PLEASE TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY BOLD BOLD BOLD >> >> I am not a lawyer but we used very good lawyers to make the squeaksource repository a safe place to do cryptography work. If you are working on cryptography DO NOT POST your code anywhere except squeaksource. Especially if you are in the USA. The ONLY repository that is approved to host our cryptography code in the USA and therefore not subject to criminal violations is squeaksource. It is a CRIME in the USA to move code and make it available on the internet for everyone to download! It must be hosted on squeaksoruce.com <http://squeaksoruce.com/> or another location that is also properly registered. >> >> IF YOU COPIED CRYPTOGRAPHY CODE TO ANOTHER REPOSITORY THAT IS NOT REGISTERED I would recommend you delete it immediately. >> >> END BOLD! >> >> Please feel free to post this to the Pharo mailing list because they apparently do not want to hear from me! >> >> All the best, >> >> Ron Teitelbaum > > > -------------------------------------------- > StÃ©phane Ducasse > http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> > 03 59 35 87 52 > Assistant: Aurore Dalle > FAX 03 59 57 78 50 > TEL 03 59 35 86 16 > S. Ducasse - Inria > 40, avenue Halley, > Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza > Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 > France > -------------------------------------------- StÃ©phane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Aurore Dalle FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France

June 2, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] About strange email related to smalltalkhub read-only on squeak-dev

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 6:18 AM Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > thanks for the info but I won't read it. I try to focus on things that > matter. There are too many things that try to distract everyone from > producing something helpful. Law suits are IMHO not of that kind. > > I would rather put some money on the table for someone building proper FFI > to openssl. The Cryptography was a mess I cleaned a bit but I had also > scenarios where the squeak code was not working properly. And there is no > real reason to have a smalltalk implementation of crypto if we carry around > openssl anyway (for iceberg and secure connects). > > PierceNg has an implementation that implements a subset of openssl. This > implementation is modeled after the library so lots of class methods. I'd > prefer to have something more object model like. > > So if you think you can implement this please contact me and tell me what > you think how long it takes and how much it will cost to do at least the > things we have now in Cryptography. I'm willing to collect money or pay it > myself. > > I second this. VA Smalltalk included a complete FFI wrapper of OpenSSL in VAST 8.6.2 (2015) and it was one of the best decisions ever. -- Mariano Martinez Peck Email: marianopeck(a)gmail.com Twitter: @MartinezPeck LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-martinez-peck <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariano-mart%C3%ADnez-peck/> Blog: https://marianopeck.wordpress.com/

June 2, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #327: Image side changes to use the new memory accessor primitives.

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #327 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6400 was integrated: "Image side changes to use the new memory accessor primitives." Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6400 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/feature Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 2, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #326: [fix] remove usage of reflectivity to get ast methods by default.

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #326 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6432 was integrated: "[fix] remove usage of reflectivity to get ast methods by default." Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6432 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/removingReflectivityFromASTCa… Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 2, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] About strange email related to smalltalkhub read-only on squeak-dev

by Norbert Hartl

Hi Paul, thanks for the info but I won't read it. I try to focus on things that matter. There are too many things that try to distract everyone from producing something helpful. Law suits are IMHO not of that kind. I would rather put some money on the table for someone building proper FFI to openssl. The Cryptography was a mess I cleaned a bit but I had also scenarios where the squeak code was not working properly. And there is no real reason to have a smalltalk implementation of crypto if we carry around openssl anyway (for iceberg and secure connects). PierceNg has an implementation that implements a subset of openssl. This implementation is modeled after the library so lots of class methods. I'd prefer to have something more object model like. So if you think you can implement this please contact me and tell me what you think how long it takes and how much it will cost to do at least the things we have now in Cryptography. I'm willing to collect money or pay it myself. Norbert > Am 31.05.2020 um 16:04 schrieb Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic(a)gmail.com>: > > Hi Norbert, > > The EFF gives a nice overview of the US situation: > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/us-export-controls-and-published-encr… <https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/us-export-controls-and-published-encr…> > > Although you are not a US citizen, and don't live here, so I don't know how > it could affect you. > > In the link above the EFF does say they provide free consultations about > this topic so I'm sure someone there will clear things up for you. > > Paul > > > > > > > NorbertHartl wrote >> Yes, let us coordinate what to respond. To me this doesn't even sound like >> Ron. Usually he is a rather quite and reasonable guy. Seems to be a lot of >> misunderstandings here (again). >> As I was the one copying the Cryptography package to github it concerns me >> a bit. I've been remembered now about yet another strange law suit in the >> US and indeed we need to raise a bit of awareness for this. >> >> So let's figure out what has to be done. >> >> Norbert >> >> >>> Am 30.05.2020 um 14:43 schrieb StÃ©phane Ducasse < > >> stephane.ducasse@ > >> >: >>> >>> Hi all >>> >>> This is the week-end and we worked super well yesterday during the >>> sprint. Lot of good enhancements - Thanks a lot to all the participants. >>> I not really happy to be forced to do it on a sunny saturday but Iâm >>> doing it to clarify points. >>> >>> Esteban sent me this text that was posted on Squeak-Dev (I personally do >>> not read squeak related forums because >>> I have not the time and my focus is Pharo, its consortium, my team, my >>> research and my family). >>> >>> We have to react because >>> - We do not really at ***all** understand this email >>> - We did not kicked anybody from our mailing-list from ages - so ron is >>> lying. In the past we even had discussion with ron - so we do not >>> really understand. May be we got problem to log on our mailing-lists. >>> We have no idea because we are working and not looking at such things. >>> - When we migrated smalltalkhub to readonly we payed attention to make >>> sure that private projects stay private. >>> We did not migrated smalltalkhub for fun. We MUST do it or it will be >>> done by our infrastructure! >>> - Now the cryptography packages are MIT and they are public anyway. So >>> again we do not understand anything. >>> >>> We do not get why Ron contacted us because we announced the migration >>> publicly way in advance and we will keep >>> the Smalltalkhub frozen repo for at least next 5 years. >>> >>> I feel really sorry to hear such kind of email because we do not want to >>> fight with anybody. >>> Our goal is to make sure that people can work with Pharo and expand their >>> business and knowledge. >>> We are working hard to make sure that people can invent their future with >>> Pharo and people that know us personally >>> know that we are not lying. >>> >>> S >>> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've tried to work with the Pharo group but they keep kicking me out of >>>> their mailing list. I've already mentioned this a number of times to >>>> the Pharo group but nobody seems to care. >>>> >>>> BOLD BOLD BOLD PLEASE TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY BOLD BOLD BOLD >>>> >>>> I am not a lawyer but we used very good lawyers to make the squeaksource >>>> repository a safe place to do cryptography work. If you are working on >>>> cryptography DO NOT POST your code anywhere except squeaksource. >>>> Especially if you are in the USA. The ONLY repository that is approved >>>> to host our cryptography code in the USA and therefore not subject to >>>> criminal violations is squeaksource. It is a CRIME in the USA to move >>>> code and make it available on the internet for everyone to download! It >>>> must be hosted on squeaksoruce.com <http://squeaksoruce.com/> <http://squeaksoruce.com/&gt <http://squeaksoruce.com/&gt>; or >>>> another location that is also properly registered. >>>> >>>> IF YOU COPIED CRYPTOGRAPHY CODE TO ANOTHER REPOSITORY THAT IS NOT >>>> REGISTERED I would recommend you delete it immediately. >>>> >>>> END BOLD! >>>> >>>> Please feel free to post this to the Pharo mailing list because they >>>> apparently do not want to hear from me! >>>> >>>> All the best, >>>> >>>> Ron Teitelbaum >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> StÃ©phane Ducasse >>> http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/&gt <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/&gt>; >>> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> <http://www.pharo.org/&gt <http://www.pharo.org/&gt>; >>> 03 59 35 87 52 >>> Assistant: Aurore Dalle >>> FAX 03 59 57 78 50 >>> TEL 03 59 35 86 16 >>> S. Ducasse - Inria >>> 40, avenue Halley, >>> Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza >>> Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 >>> France >>> > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html>

June 2, 2020