January 2020 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Wrong behavior of receiveDataInto:fromHost:port:

by HilaireFernandes

Hi Sven, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote > Sounds nice, and indeed a (more) fun way to teach programming. > > But I still fail to see why you have to filter incoming UDP packets on > their origin address. If third party software on the workstation are connected to other network services, don't you want to filter out? Or am I missing something? Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote > I do agree that using ByteArray and SocketAddress interchanging fails in > some cases, even though one is a subclass of the other, because #= fails, > due to the class check. > > I can't see an easy way to fix this (as #= is defined in > SequenceableCollection). One solution might be to add #species ByteArray > to SocketAddress, but it is hard to see the implications of that. > > Another option might be to add: > > SocketAddress>>#= anObject > ^ self == anObject or: [ self hasEqualElements: anObject ] > > This way, #= would work when the SocketAddress is the receiver (but not > the other way around which is ugly). Yes, not to be symmetric is a bit a problem, likely not a good addition to Pharo. I will see how it goes on my exploration of this topic. Thanks Hilaire ----- http://drgeo.eu -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Jan. 26, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #27: SUCCESS

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #27 was: SUCCESS. Could not extract further issue information from commit message: Merge branch 'Pharo9.0' of github.com:pharo-project/pharo into Pharo9.0 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Jan. 25, 2020

[Pharo 9.0] Build #26: 5573-SpDropListPresenterselectedIndex-

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #26 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5576 was integrated: "5573-SpDropListPresenterselectedIndex-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5576 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5573 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Jan. 25, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo9.x?

by ducasse

Thanks. For me I cannot get the phar9.x branch loading. I will investigate if I can understand what is the problem aselineOfCozy >> baseline: spec [ <baseline> spec for: #'pharo8.x' do: [ spec package: 'CozyCommon'. spec package: 'CozyPharo8' with: [ spec requires: #('CozyCommon') ] ]. spec for: #'pharo9.x' do: [ spec package: 'CozyCommon'. spec package: 'CozyIceberg'. spec package: 'CozyTheme'. spec package: 'CozyPharo9' with: [ spec requires: #('CozyCommon') ] ]. ] > On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:50, Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well: > > https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSma… <https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSma…> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse <stepharo(a)netcourrier.com <mailto:stepharo@netcourrier.com>> wrote: > Hi > > I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and Iâm wondering if we should not > add pharo9.x to a list somewhere. > > S. > > > >

Jan. 25, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update

by ducasse

thanks esteban. We should take the time to bullet proof our process. S. > On 25 Jan 2020, at 08:33, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Mmm. There is an error in the CI and it did not uploaded the stable*.zip archives (while it did the latest). > I uploaded them by hand but we need to review the process (problem is now I cannot test it in my machine anymore, I need to prepare an environment) > >> On 25 Jan 2020, at 07:30, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Which url? >> I donât know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the correct version. >> >> but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 while it should show 8.0.1. >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: >>> >>> EstebanLM wrote >>>> Done >>> >>> I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 >>> (bbcdf97). Is there another step? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Cheers, >>> Sean >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >>> >> > >

Jan. 25, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update

by Esteban Lorenzano

Mmm. There is an error in the CI and it did not uploaded the stable*.zip archives (while it did the latest). I uploaded them by hand but we need to review the process (problem is now I cannot test it in my machine anymore, I need to prepare an environment) > On 25 Jan 2020, at 07:30, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Which url? > I donât know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the correct version. > > but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 while it should show 8.0.1. > > Esteban > >> On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: >> >> EstebanLM wrote >>> Done >> >> I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 >> (bbcdf97). Is there another step? >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> >

Jan. 25, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update

by Esteban Lorenzano

Which url? I donât know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the correct version. but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 while it should show 8.0.1. Esteban > On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > > EstebanLM wrote >> Done > > I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 > (bbcdf97). Is there another step? > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >

Jan. 25, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo9.x?

by Gabriel Cotelli

We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well: https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSma… On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse <stepharo(a)netcourrier.com> wrote: > Hi > > I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and Iâm wondering if we > should not > add pharo9.x to a list somewhere. > > S. > > > > >

Jan. 24, 2020

Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update

by Sean P. DeNigris

EstebanLM wrote > Done I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 (bbcdf97). Is there another step? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Jan. 24, 2020

pharo9.x?

by ducasse

Hi I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and Iâm wondering if we should not add pharo9.x to a list somewhere. S.

Jan. 24, 2020