October 2019 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo 8.0] Build #827: 2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed

by ducasse

We know. It was not my intention. I was slowly trying to identify what object (and not models) need it. Denis pushed it and now we will remove it. The idea is to - place it in Model - I introduced DisplayableObject as a superclass of the objects that still do icon: named and others. Now you cannot imagine how many plain objects (yes this is terrible to me) are receiver of it. Stef > On 4 Oct 2019, at 15:36, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > > ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2 wrote >> "2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed" > > I was surprised to see `Object>>#iconNamed:`. While it certainly reduces the > duplication of `Smalltalk ui icons`, we have seemed extremely reluctant in > the past to add to Object's inevitable bloat. I'm curious what made this one > in particular worth it? > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >

Oct. 4, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #828: 4818-Test-failing-in-build-testExternalMorphicDependencies

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #828 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #4824 was integrated: "4818-Test-failing-in-build-testExternalMorphicDependencies" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4824 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4818 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Oct. 4, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo 8.0] Build #827: 2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed

by Sean P. DeNigris

ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2 wrote > "2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed" I was surprised to see `Object>>#iconNamed:`. While it certainly reduces the duplication of `Smalltalk ui icons`, we have seemed extremely reluctant in the past to add to Object's inevitable bloat. I'm curious what made this one in particular worth it? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Oct. 4, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #827: 2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #827 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #4821 was integrated: "2442-Commander-should-not-use-Smalltalk-ui-icons-but-self-iconNamed" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4821 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/2442 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Oct. 4, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] XmlSupport on GitHub?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 4 Oct 2019, at 12:37, BenoÃ®t Verhaeghe <badetitou(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I think this is what you're looking for > https://github.com/svenvc/XML-Support-Pharo > > (but maybe not) Indeed, this is just a dirty 'last-version-only' copy, definitively *not* the final solutions. > BenoÃ®t > > Le ven. 4 oct. 2019 Ã 12:29, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > Did anyone port XmlSupport to GitHub? > > Cheers, > Tudor > > > -- > feenk.com > > âHow do you feenk today?" > >

Oct. 4, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] XmlSupport on GitHub?

by BenoÃ®t Verhaeghe

Hello, I think this is what you're looking for https://github.com/svenvc/XML-Support-Pharo (but maybe not) BenoÃ®t Le ven. 4 oct. 2019 Ã 12:29, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > Did anyone port XmlSupport to GitHub? > > Cheers, > Tudor > > > -- > feenk.com > > âHow do you feenk today?" > > >

Oct. 4, 2019

XmlSupport on GitHub?

by Tudor Girba

Hi, Did anyone port XmlSupport to GitHub? Cheers, Tudor -- feenk.com âHow do you feenk today?"

Oct. 4, 2019

Re: [Pharo-dev] Antlr4 + SmaCC

by Stephan Eggermont

Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote: > On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 11:54 +0200, Santiago Bragagnolo wrote: >> Hi there! >> I am trying to build a parser for visual basic. For doing so i found >> the Antlr definition of VB on the microsoft site. > > I tried with fortran and the answer was: Not so easy. > But then again, Fortran predates the theory of languages and it was not > defined to be easily parseable with a formal grammar. On the other hand, you know that you can parse these kinds of languages with 16K of ram, one 80 character line at a time. Stephan

Oct. 4, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #826: Fix #3138: Restore logging of SnapshotDone.

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #826 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #4814 was integrated: "Fix #3138: Restore logging of SnapshotDone." Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4814 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3138 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Oct. 4, 2019

[Pharo 8.0] Build #825: Replaced Collection>>#occurrencesOf: testing protocol for enumerating protocol

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #825 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #4813 was integrated: "Replaced Collection>>#occurrencesOf: testing protocol for enumerating protocol" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4813 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/issues/4810 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Oct. 4, 2019