June 2018 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Cool & beautiful ! The $p are good for me. I agree with the other remarks. I would love a big A4 landscape version. > On 1 Jun 2018, at 13:20, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a really nice overview! > > Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the remaining "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. > > <image.png> > Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my teaching this always confuses people. :) > > And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps definition of unary/binary message? > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.s… > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >

June 1, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #996: 20324-Handy-file-automatic-numbering

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #996 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1460 was integrated: "20324-Handy-file-automatic-numbering" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1460 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20324 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

This is a really nice overview! Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the remaining "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my teaching this always confuses people. :) And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps definition of unary/binary message? Peter On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_ > syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >

June 1, 2018

Updated syntax postcard

by Pavel Krivanek

Hi, for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax postcard: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.s… Cheers, -- Pavel

June 1, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #995: 20324-Handy-file-automatic-numbering

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #995 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1460 was integrated: "20324-Handy-file-automatic-numbering" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1460 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20324 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] curious behaviour - disappearing variable scope

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

There is also #repeat for 'infinite' loops > On 1 Jun 2018, at 10:18, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > > > On 1 June 2018 at 15:23, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > > On 1 June 2018 at 14:59, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > I'm curious about the following behaviour... > > "In Playground, first evaluate..." > s := Semaphore new. > [ [ s wait. > Transcript crShow: 'x' > ] whileTrue > ] forkAt: 41. > > Apologies for my brain freeze. It should have been... > s := Semaphore new. > [ [ s wait. > Transcript crShow: 'x'. > true ] whileTrue > ] forkAt: 41. > > > But an error around the end of the block rather than the start would have been useful. > cheers -ben > > > "then later..." > s signal. > > ==> 'x' is seen in Transcript > but then an error pops up "#wait was sent to nil" > > So... 's' *was* valid and then its not? > > cheers -ben > >

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] curious behaviour - disappearing variable scope

by Ben Coman

On 1 June 2018 at 15:23, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > > On 1 June 2018 at 14:59, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > >> I'm curious about the following behaviour... >> >> "In Playground, first evaluate..." >> s := Semaphore new. >> [ [ s wait. >> > Transcript crShow: 'x' >> > ] whileTrue >> > ] forkAt: 41. >> > Apologies for my brain freeze. It should have been... s := Semaphore new. [ [ s wait. Transcript crShow: 'x'. true ] whileTrue ] forkAt: 41. But an error around the end of the block rather than the start would have been useful. cheers -ben > >> "then later..." >> s signal. >> >> ==> 'x' is seen in Transcript >> but then an error pops up "#wait was sent to nil" >> >> So... 's' *was* valid and then its not? >> >> cheers -ben >> >

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] curious behaviour - disappearing variable scope

by Ben Coman

On 1 June 2018 at 14:59, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > I'm curious about the following behaviour... > > "In Playground, first evaluate..." > s := Semaphore new. > [ [ s wait. Transcript crShow: 'x' ] whileTrue ] fork. > > "then later..." > s signal. > > ==> 'x' is seen in Transcript > but then an error pops up "#wait was sent to nil" > > So... 's' *was* valid and then its not? > > cheers -ben > Sorry I got distracted. I should have added version info... Image ----- C:\PharoLauncher\images\Pharo-7.0.0-alpha.build.994.sha.6b52ae6.arch.32bit\Pharo-7.0.0-alpha.build.994.sha.6b52ae6.arch.32bit.image Pharo7.0alpha Build information: Pharo-7.0+alpha.build.994.sha.6b52ae62b755d8778fa0b5a4ac53b39b6c107dc9 (32 Bit) Unnamed Virtual Machine --------------- C:\Users\Ben\Documents\Pharo\vms\70-x86\Pharo.exe CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2361 uuid: 7ca2f89a-de70-422f-b92b-54f91ac4e47b Apr 12 2018 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2361 uuid: 7ca2f89a-de70-422f-b92b-54f91ac4e47b Apr 12 2018 VM: 201804122226 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Date: Thu Apr 12 15:26:17 2018 -0700 $ CommitHash: 07c6dc3 $ Plugins: 201804122226 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Win32 built on Apr 12 2018 22:41:03 GMT Compiler: 6.4.0 VMMaker versionString VM: 201804122226 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Date: Thu Apr 12 15:26:17 2018 -0700 $ CommitHash: 07c6dc3 $ Plugins: 201804122226 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2361 uuid: 7ca2f89a-de70-422f-b92b-54f91ac4e47b Apr 12 2018 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2361 uuid: 7ca2f89a-de70-422f-b92b-54f91ac4e47b Apr 12 2018 VM as selected by PharoLauncher. cheers -ben

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] server slow

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 1 Jun 2018, at 09:01, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > > >> On 1 Jun 2018, at 03:55, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: >> >> Server access is very slow for me right now. It took 20 seconds to bring up the directory index for... >> https://files.pharo.org/image >> >> Is it just me? >> cheers -ben > > Right, but it *is* a directory with 3000 files â¦ yes, that will always be slow. on second thought you also shouldnât need to go there, unless some specific need. Esteban > >

June 1, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] server slow

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 1 Jun 2018, at 03:55, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > Server access is very slow for me right now. It took 20 seconds to bring up the directory index for... > https://files.pharo.org/image > > Is it just me? > cheers -ben Right, but it *is* a directory with 3000 files ...

June 1, 2018