September 2017 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

by Sean P. DeNigris

I always put my packages in gitroot/repository per instructions I read when I was starting with FT (Dale's IIRC). It's a (minor) drag to type that every time I add a local git repo. How would y'all feel about a setting? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #135: 20434-use-Ring2-during-the-bootstrap

by Stephane Ducasse

Yes it was the talk of the conference and it would have been a tough talk without the cartoons :) On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > >> On 20 Sep 2017, at 11:40, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >> More infos about Ring2: >> >> https://www.slideshare.net/esug/metamodeling-of-custom-pharo-images > > The cartoons on the slides are hilarious ! > >>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 11:32, ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2(a)inria.fr wrote: >>> >>> There is a new Pharo build available! >>> >>> The status of the build #135 was: SUCCESS. >>> >>> The Pull Request #294 was integrated: "20434-use-Ring2-during-the-bootstrap" >>> Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/294 >>> >>> Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20434 >>> Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2… >> >> > >

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo-Launcher Windows 10 requires admin privilg

by Stephane Ducasse

Tx a lot for the feedback! On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Alex Laurie <alex.r.laurie(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Latest version of Pharo launcher requires Admin privileges to launch > properly. If it doesn't have Admin permission it throws a "stdout does not > exist." error. > > Not sure if this is the right mailing list for the launcher, if not let me > know. > > Cheers, > Alex

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc status

by Stephane Ducasse

Sean you should consider that TxText was important because it enabled the new textEditor. Bloc is stabilising for real. I can tell you that it was not an easy decision to rewrite Bloc after Brescia. And it should get out. SimpleMorphic and Morphic 3 where not related to our effort. I really encourage people to build things with Bloc. The more we will do it the better. Stef On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Tudor Girba-2 wrote >> As we are a commercial entity, for us this is a business issue, not a >> hobby. This means that we have all incentives to finish things so that we >> can build what we actually want to build :). > > This is good to hear. I share Marcus' concern. After (almost? about?) 10 > years in the Smalltalk community, my unbridled enthusiasm about new > game-changing projects has mellowed to keep-working-as-usual-and-"we'll > see". For every contributor like Sven, who has created and maintained > multiple essential libraries over years, there seem to be 10 projects that > fizzle out after an initial period of excitement and activity. Nearly all my > revolutionary (in my head anyway ha ha) plans were thwarted early on. At > first I blamed our spaghetti Morphic implementation which I found impossible > to deal with once one wants to do anything uncommon. It's interesting to > note that Morphic is itself the victim of unending experimentation without > the promised final cleanup into a clean, understandable, usable, sane? form. > After so many years have passed, however, I think the bigger barrier was the > illusion that something better was "right around the corner". Instead of > slogging through or cleaning Morphic myself, I put everything on hold until > Morphic 3, SimpleMorphic, TxText (slightly different, but related), Blocâ¦ It > will be nice to finally have something real to play with! Maybe the time is > nowâ¦ > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg

by Stephan Eggermont

On 19/09/17 17:52, Marcus Denker wrote: > I personally find it very confusing that http://files.pharo.org/vm/Â does > not have the current > VMsâ¦ Now I am confused. The date seems to suggest they are current? At least on Linux Stephan

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #138: 20443-SDL-Event-not-initialized

by Denis Kudriashov

And now opening external window is working out of the box. Cool. 2017-09-20 18:28 GMT+02:00 <ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2(a)inria.fr>: > There is a new Pharo build available! > > The status of the build #138 was: SUCCESS. > > The Pull Request #300 was integrated: "20443-SDL-Event-not-initialized" > Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/300 > > Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20443 > Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending% > 20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/development/138/ >

Sept. 20, 2017

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #138: 20443-SDL-Event-not-initialized

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #138 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #300 was integrated: "20443-SDL-Event-not-initialized" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/300 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20443 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo-Launcher Windows 10 requires admin privilg

by Ben Coman

Thx for your feedback. How did you install it? Actually for a long time I believe PharoLauncher should be installed under a User folder (the same as Unix systems) and not under "Program Files" which may be the root cause of such problems. If PharoLauncher has been installed under "Program Files" trying copying its folder to your desktop and run from there. cheers -ben On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Alex Laurie <alex.r.laurie(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Latest version of Pharo launcher requires Admin privileges to launch > properly. If it doesn't have Admin permission it throws a "stdout does not > exist." error. > > Not sure if this is the right mailing list for the launcher, if not let me > know. > > Cheers, > Alex >

Sept. 20, 2017

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #137: 20435-The-CI-process-should-fail-if-the-conversion-fails

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #137 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #292 was integrated: "20435-The-CI-process-should-fail-if-the-conversion-fails" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/292 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20435 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Sept. 20, 2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc status

by Sean P. DeNigris

Tudor Girba-2 wrote > As we are a commercial entity, for us this is a business issue, not a > hobby. This means that we have all incentives to finish things so that we > can build what we actually want to build :). This is good to hear. I share Marcus' concern. After (almost? about?) 10 years in the Smalltalk community, my unbridled enthusiasm about new game-changing projects has mellowed to keep-working-as-usual-and-"we'll see". For every contributor like Sven, who has created and maintained multiple essential libraries over years, there seem to be 10 projects that fizzle out after an initial period of excitement and activity. Nearly all my revolutionary (in my head anyway ha ha) plans were thwarted early on. At first I blamed our spaghetti Morphic implementation which I found impossible to deal with once one wants to do anything uncommon. It's interesting to note that Morphic is itself the victim of unending experimentation without the promised final cleanup into a clean, understandable, usable, sane? form. After so many years have passed, however, I think the bigger barrier was the illusion that something better was "right around the corner". Instead of slogging through or cleaning Morphic myself, I put everything on hold until Morphic 3, SimpleMorphic, TxText (slightly different, but related), Blocâ¦ It will be nice to finally have something real to play with! Maybe the time is nowâ¦ ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Sept. 20, 2017